@chenna1985 @NikhilYewale93 Sent you a DM!

@chenna1985 @NikhilYewale93 It can also be done at compile-time and embedded into the executable though, that's just an implementation detail.

@chenna1985 @NikhilYewale93 Depends how you define AD, but symbolically differentiated compile-time generated code for derivatives can be very close to manually optimized derivatives in our experience. To the point where bottlenecks are elsewhere...

@istvan_csanady Implicits many fundamental drawbacks though. For example, if you have to surfaces that are very close together, they will tend to merge with implicits unless you have some way of knowing that there's a gap. There are also fundamental issues with using implicits for simulation

@chenna1985 Aren't LLMs fundamentally unable to innovate? That's been my experience. It's useful for assisting with already solved problems but it's never ever been of any help at all for new problems that presumably hardly anyone else has ever looked at.

@chenna1985 ... will anyway be dominated by the areas where you have the highest resolution (in both space and time), whereas the coarser elements are likely to cost you much less. So it seems to me that you'd need a very special scenario for it to be worth the complexity...

@chenna1985 Looks fun to simulate too!

@heskelbalas @zhou_xian_ @j_d_noone @jessfraz Looks like it's "visually accurate", i.e. it gives visually realistic simulations for the most part. But I wouldn't expect any decent force measurements (which you'd typically need for CAD-related stuff) since this requires entirely different simulation methods

@chenna1985 I do mainly solids, but man do I dislike DG. Discontinuous displacement field is sometimes very impractical, and it just feels... Icky 😅

@chenna1985 I'm also working on something CutFEM-like and I'm also writing my own code because it's nice to have the flexibility, and not have to work against the limitations imposed by FEM libraries that were not designed for it

RT @yiningkarlli: MPM continues to be the GOAT multi-phase physics solver, and I always like to point out / brag that it was introduced int…

@chenna1985 Huh, so there's really nonvalidation in any of the papers? That's unfortunate if it's th case... Not super familiar with LBM, would you be willing to elaborate what makes it unsuitable?

I'm up and running on Bluesky in an attempt to join the exodus. Fingers crossed it sticks.

@ExodusPgame @keenanisalive Yeah, I think I actually prefer the "hard" way, ironically I find it easier for this reason

@chenna1985 Yeah, I've always thought it makes more sense to use NN to somehow speed up conventional simulation rather than replacing it outright. i don't think NN alone could ever give enough accuracy and reliability

If there's one thing AI is *actually* good at (but not perfect), it's translation. This comes at a good time for the EU — which traditionally has been limited by language barriers — as European countries need to cooperate more than ever to secure their own interests

Jesus Christ, this is like a trailer for a prequel to 1984

@chrisoffner3d Imo graphics is at a totally different level compared to engineering / applied math / physics. I just can't take more of those painful red/blue MATLAB plots 😅