⚡️
@abunahla10
Followers
188
Following
15K
Statuses
2K
لا إله إلا الله محمد رسول الله
دار الابتلاء والفتن
Joined February 2022
@Jdxdd1356 @najdi_mujadid @MuflihIbn So your only argument is to say we’re guilty of tajseem… which is a mere reinstating of your original claim while hiding behind your hissī/mutlaq distinction to equivocate on ‘uluww. If you can try again, do you have an actual argument? I’m sure you have read some kalam.
0
0
0
@Jdxdd1356 @najdi_mujadid @MuflihIbn Neither you nor your esteemed mutakallimun can bring one argument against the affirmation of ‘uluww the way we profess it. They really think Allāh being above the throne means He is confined in a box… This just exhibits the primitive nature of kalaam and it’s dispensability.
2
0
4
@Thinkwithfitra @nasafism @Jdxdd1356 Exactly, his only hope is to keep parroting the same questions and caricatures without actually engaging with my symmetry breaker.
1
0
2
@nasafism @Jdxdd1356 In your head you think you’re the main character, but in reality I’m not engaging with you until you address the main point of my post which is to highlight his double standard. If you want to play the game of “look he’s not replying therefore he’s running!” then so can I.
@nasafism @al_Raaziyy @guywithlibrary @HarounKanj Let me remind you doofus, that you made an argument upon my request; You then made a strawman by claiming I said the Qur’ān is uncreated because it’s called the Word of Allāh. Now that I’ve corrected you, all you have to say is that I’m restating my claim? Man up and engage.
1
0
2
@Jdxdd1356 So do you condemn your scholars for accusing the Messenger ﷺ of teaching tajseem on purpose? I want a straight “yes” or “no”.
1
0
3
Aristotle was actually noted to believe in ~55 unmoved movers. There was nothing monotheistic about him. In his “Physics”, he argues for the necessity of an unmoved mover in an attempt to explain reality—not to prove some sort of religious idea as an end goal, like Aquinas does.
0
0
0
@nasafism @Jdxdd1356 “Got humbled” how exactly? The toe-dust you constantly inhale from your pir’s corpse may be taking a toll on your cognitive capacities I’m afraid. Furthermore, on one hand we’re extremists for levelling graves but on the other, we somehow endorse Hindu temples? Got it.
1
0
2
@nasafism @Jdxdd1356 The only thing you be stomping is your feet in the masjid while you perform your hippie-zikr. Cut the rhetoric. Now, will you answer the question, or will you continue to perpetually repeat yourself like a robot?
1
0
2
Nowadays, you have some confused individuals who identify as Muslims whilst mistakenly adopting the label “Aristotelian” to describe their beliefs about Allāh.
0
0
1
@nasafism @Jdxdd1356 I don’t care about where you think these interrogations originate from, but more-so about how you deal with them and whether or not you either agree with your brother here, or your scholars.
1
0
2
In a rash moment where he is out of his depth in a theological discussion, he runs to the topic of scripture — not knowing he’s actually arguing against his own scholars.
0
2
29
@HazThomist @Thomisticae There’s nothing wrong with composition. Nor do I need to take existence as a first-order property. God-forsaken classical theists are stuck in the loop of medieval brain rot.
0
0
4
If “underdevelopment” here is taken to mean a lack of unintelligible blabber and concocted axioms then we thank Allāh ﷻ for protecting our deen from this nonsense. Imagine your best theologian is a designated absurdist in the same department his reputation revolves around 🥱
@HazThomist Also, keep in mind that Islamic theology and philosophy in general is very very undeveloped and they've got nothing of the useful and necessary topics, distinctions, divisions, etc., that we have in scholastic theology and philosophy. It's just an absolute waste of time.
0
0
9
@HazThomist @Thomisticae There is no such thing as “pure act”. We are not committed to your dusty metaphysical conventions which quite frankly belong to the fantasy-fiction section of a library.
1
0
3
@Thomisticae @HazThomist Keep running you freak. Your deity is a fat clown just like your favourite theologian.
Outdated wizard theologians; Astro & Wagner, both can’t handle a single argument I ran against their faith (I can run over 50, and I can devil’s advocate atheism therein run over 100 too) 😂😂 weakling. My shoe has more knowledge than them, cavemen schizo-ramblers. I can do a better job defending the Trinity.
0
0
3