Some Person
@a69774
Followers
768
Following
7K
Statuses
19K
100% TERF meaning: Tired of Explaining Reality to F**kwits. Gay dude, older model. pic is the amazing Randi. Police are good, actually.
Joined October 2023
The woke nuts took over the D party forever ago, did you not notice? You’re the party that castrated 5800 teenagers since 219. Put men in women’s prisons. Burned down a bunch of the country for radical leftist grifters who stole money (and the papers BLM touted as cause were retracted). Pushed a weird gender religion on kids in schools Fought for pornography in middle schools Platformed drag queen bingo weirdness As one of the “normal gays” JD Vance correctly said “just wanted to be left alone”, letting you know the D party lost the plot forever ago, and the court cases brewing now are going to make Harris and Biden look terrible (see the amicus brief in Alabama and look for Adm. Levine in there)
10
7
78
And what is that faith in? In “born in the wrong body”? The idea that you’re a female soul trapped in a man’s body? A deeply religious concept backed by zero evidence, not even slightly. In fact, the studies we have on AGP older trans “women” do show the brain structures are closer to men, but frankly I don’t find those studies compelling either for the same reasons. Your delusions don’t mean you understand what it is to be a woman. Your only frame of reference is your deep seated faith.
0
0
1
In short - and I think this much is fair to say - I think we’re groping around in a huge dark room with a broom - where consciousness and its diseases are concerned, and perhaps looking at the wrong stuff because we don’t even begin to know where to look. But it doesn’t mean stuff like this doesn’t have real value or interest - IE who cares if the brain structures cause it, it is very interesting that AGP trans people do in fact resemble male brain structures. Dispensing with all the cause/effect stuff, this observation still has real impact.
0
0
2
@Danielaltiere @kraegkust @RM_22017 @fllgator1 @magically_amber @X_Aeon_X @iamAtheistGirl Well, if you consider explicitly defined words “hate”, then I suppose it must seem that way. Unshocking!
0
0
0
lol, like I said, literally every bullet point has happened - as anyone reading along could verify in under five seconds with Google. You’re free to pretend it hasn’t, it won’t change the literal torrent of lawsuits coming your sides way thanks to the fact that it all happened. Here’s a helpful video with a few pieces of it that happened. Feel free to pause it at the parts with names and you’ll be able to fact check it - it’s 100% accurate.
0
0
2
You pretend the things I just listed didn’t happen? Wait all you want. You’re just lying to yourself and being too lazy to even evaluate my claims. Unluckily for you, too much was done too openly, and I didn’t even touch on the whole “mutilating kids” thing. Literally every bullet point I listed above happened. We both know you know that, you’re just trying approach 1, “that doesn’t happen”. Would you like to use approach two (“that barely happens, why do you care?”), or do you want to skip straight to number 3, what you really feel: “it’s good that it’s happening”.
1
0
1
@ToriatheistTori Pretty sure we’ve observed elephants having something that sure looks like ritual moon worship.
0
0
0
Sure did some negative shit to the women whose voices you love to ignore. The women in women’s prisons, sexually harassed and raped. The women in women’s shelters, sexually harassed, attacked, raped. The girls in changing rooms, told their boundaries don’t matter. The women in sport, attacked by men on a national stage to cheers of a crowd. Behind your cutesy slogans lies heroes and a deep seated hatred of women.
1
0
2
Wanted to add to this. Today you’re four months and one day! Keep doing it. Stack them one days and trust me, people will take notice. Not necessarily of the sober, but of the you that will emerge. And if you falter, know that it isn’t the end. You can always do this, all it takes is one day. Then another. You only ever have to do a day at a time. (As you already know). You deserve this.
0
0
0
@ElijahSchaffer When the nagging scolds moved to the Democrat leadership, it left a vacuum. Nagging scolds aren’t inherently bad. They’re important in libraries. They keep books protected, vibes immaculate, and homeless people from masturbating on the free internet access.
0
0
1
lol, I’ve read the neuropsyche studies you’re poorly misrepresenting right now, and no. Not even close to conclusive, in fact calling that “fringe” is beyond accurate. You’re going on sheer faith. Go read the studies you just lied about, you’ll find I’m accurate. Not the article poorly paraphrasing them, silly religious lady, the studies. You can skip to the conclusions section if you struggle with the body, unlike you scientists are accurate when they’re winging it and our understanding of the brain is nowhere near what you’ve claimed here, lol
0
0
0
@0AmethystLilith @Lilith_Atheist No, it isn’t, but believing that a man with gender dysphoria “is” a woman, is a deeply religious belief. And covering it with “love” to avoid the logical incoherence is also pretty religious sounding
1
0
0
@BobJoe88229 None. I was thinking of trying something with AI if I ever figure out the X API, but I don’t really do tech projects on off time anymore, so I may just learn to accept it unless some more experienced Xer posts something.
1
0
0
@iamAtheistGirl @X_Aeon_X @22kismetkenton @kraegkust @RM_22017 @fllgator1 @magically_amber Feel free to answer the question you dodged, “atheist” girl.
0
0
1
@kraegkust @RM_22017 @fllgator1 @magically_amber @X_Aeon_X @iamAtheistGirl When did I say chromosomes were the definer? I said, and I repeat. That in edge cases, those cases are based off physiological evidence. I’m happy to provide my DSD chart for you.
6
0
2
@kraegkust @RM_22017 @fllgator1 @magically_amber @X_Aeon_X @iamAtheistGirl Here’s the bit you appear to be struggling with
@kraegkust @RM_22017 @fllgator1 @magically_amber @X_Aeon_X @iamAtheistGirl No, I pointed out part of the “demonstrable physiological traits” was chromosomes, which is relevant in DSDs, or in the case of a women born without ovaries. Anyone born with ovaries is “of the nature to produce large gametes”, even in the rare cases said ovaries can’t.
2
0
1