![Crypto Jebb Profile](https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/1783163006446080000/-MOxpD_I_x96.jpg)
Crypto Jebb
@_CoffeeNCrypto_
Followers
69K
Following
7K
Statuses
4K
Helping solve Americas financial problems, one family at a time. #FinSov
Florida
Joined November 2017
RT @JDVance: If a judge tried to tell a general how to conduct a military operation, that would be illegal. If a judge tried to command th…
0
48K
0
RT @Cointelegraph: 🇺🇸 BULLISH: US states are advancing Bitcoin reserve bills, fueling speculation about a global accumulation race. Kentuck…
0
135
0
Exactly. DEFY
@SenTomCotton @elonmusk @DOGE An unconstitutional law/court order that is repugnant of the constitution, or in direct contradiction thereof, is void and may be legally ignored through the act of non-compliance and/or non-enforcement. -‘Marbury v Madison’-
0
0
2
TREASONOUS. UNCONSTITUTIONAL. EVIL. THIS IS AN ATTEMPT AT DICTATORSHIP. THE PRESIDENT HAS AUTHORITY OVER THE TREASURY. THERE'S A REASON THE TREASURY IS RIGHT NEXT TO THE WHITE HOUSE.
LAWFARE: In an egregious and unconstitutional assault on executive authority, Judge Paul Engelmayer has unilaterally forbidden all of Trump's political appointees—including Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent—from accessing Treasury Department data. This ruling, concocted without legal precedent or constitutional justification, is nothing short of judicial sabotage. Worse, it was issued ex parte—meaning Trump administration lawyers weren’t given notice, weren’t allowed to argue, and weren’t even in the room. Only Democrat attorneys general were heard, ensuring a predetermined outcome. Engelmayer’s order is legally indefensible. He cites no statutory basis because none exists. He offers no constitutional rationale because the Constitution directly contradicts him. Instead, he fabricates a fiction: that the duly appointed Treasury Secretary is nothing more than a ceremonial figurehead, akin to a powerless monarch, while unelected bureaucrats—who answer to no voters—control the nation’s finances. This is judicial tyranny masquerading as jurisprudence. The implications are staggering. By stripping the executive branch of access to its own financial data, this ruling effectively transfers control of the federal purse to the permanent bureaucracy—the so-called “deep state.” That is a direct assault on the Constitution’s separation of powers, which vests executive authority in the elected President and his appointees, not in career government employees. This is lawfare at its most brazen: a raw, partisan power grab dressed up in legalese. If allowed to stand, this decision sets the precedent that any left-wing judge can unilaterally strip the President of his authority and hand it to the administrative state. That is not democracy. It is not law. It is judicial dictatorship. While the order is currently set to last only a week, no serious person believes this won’t be extended if the courts think they can get away with it. The Trump Administration should treat this for what it is—an unconstitutional usurpation—and consider defying it outright. No judge has the authority to cripple the executive branch and hand power to unelected bureaucrats. Beyond that, the Supreme Court must intervene and overturn this blatant violation of constitutional governance. Judge Engelmayer should be barred from hearing any future cases related to executive authority, and every Democrat lawyer who enabled this attack on the Constitution should be sanctioned. This is not a legal dispute—it is a coup by the judiciary against the elected government. And it cannot be allowed to stand.
7
4
40
RT @amuse: LAWFARE: In an egregious and unconstitutional assault on executive authority, Judge Paul Engelmayer has unilaterally forbidden a…
0
22K
0
RT @alx: Secretary of the Treasury functions as the CFO of the U.S. government. If the CFO is denied access to spending information, how…
0
10K
0
You are one of the most unpopular people in America and a great example of the kind of communist that Americans worked so hard to defeat. Quiet.
Yes. We have a major constitutional crisis. Americans did not fight and die to protect democracy so that the richest man in the world could single-handedly dismantle agencies that protect workers, consumers & children. Together, we can and will defeat Trump’s authoritarianism.
8
5
101
TREASON! DOWN WITH THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY AND ALL OF THIS NONSENSE.
New York Judge Paul Engelmayer just forbade all political appointees — including Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent — from accessing Dept. of Treasury data, all based on Blueanon conspiracy theories!! Those theories couldn't be challenged because the order was EX PARTE — meaning Trump's lawyers weren't warned, and couldn't weigh in. Only Democrat Attorneys General were allowed to argue. The judge cites no law or logic to support this unprecedented order, because it defies both. The judge’s ruling is, in essence, that Scott Bessent simply occupies a ceremonial position without real power, like the King of England. This is a grenade thrown into the functioning of the Treasury Department. It forbids the elected government from accessing information about budget and finances. Instead, only the permanent, deep-state government can know what's being spent. It means Scott Bessent's subordinates have far more power than Scott Bessent does. Democrat pundits who whine about the Constitution are liars, and will shred it the first chance they get. For now, the order is only for the next week, but if a court tries to make it permanent the Trump Administration should absolutely consider defying it. Better yet, SCOTUS should bar this judge from ever hearing similar cases again, and every Democrat lawyer involved should be sanctioned.
6
5
79
RT @charliekirk11: New York Judge Paul Engelmayer just forbade all political appointees — including Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent — from…
0
35K
0
I will stand and fight in an armed rebellion against this nonsense. If these evil individuals want war, than it's war they'll get. I told my children since day one that daddy is prepared to die for their nation and I MEANT IT. Elon, Trump, by order of your constituents. DEFY!
This ruling is absolutely insane! How on Earth are we supposed to stop fraud and waste of taxpayer money without looking at how money is spent? That’s literally impossible! Something super shady is going to protect scammers.
4
3
36