This is Unprecedented:
We’ve had bonds down for 3 quarters in a row in the past & we’ve had stocks down for 3 (or more) in a row.
But we have never had stocks & bonds both down in 3 consecutive quarters.
Until now.
Stocks have been despised all year and yet remain historically over-owned.
If past is prologue, that's a recipe for a secular bear market and a lost decade of equity market returns.
When equity market sentiment got washed out in 1990, 2003 and 2008, stock exposure approached 40% from above and cash exposure approached 40% from below.
This year:
If you bought S&P 500 when VIX closed above 28.5 and sold when it dropped below 28.5, you'd be up 13% YTD.
If you bought when it dropped below 28.5 and sold after it closed above 28.5, you'd be down 30% YTD.
A little more on yesterday's spike in NASDAQ new lows:
20+ years of daily data and we've never seen more stocks making new 52-week lows on the same day that the NASDAQ Composite was making a new 52-week high.
Previous instances over past 40+ years when % of $SPX stocks at 20-day highs exceeded 55%.
Nothing's certain (see 2002), but odds of further upside seem to be improving.
For evidence that a bear market is over, I want to see:
1. New lows contract
2. New highs expand
AND
3. New highs > new lows
So far we're seeing a lot of 1, a little of 2, but none of 3.
Since 2000, the VIX has closed above 28.5 just 12% of the time.
But when the VIX has been that high, the S&P 500 has produced an annualized return of greater than 40% (vs an annualized return of less than 1% when the VIX has been below 28.5).
Fade fear.
Currently at 6 days in a row of more decliners than advancers on the S&P 500. That's the longest streak this year and tied for the longest since Dec 2018.
Half of issues on NYSE+NASDAQ made new 52-week lows last week.
If that was exhaustive, then we should soon see the new low list collapse and end the 25 week run of new lows > new highs.
Dec 2018 looks like a cyclical low, meaning we are only a year or so into the current bull market. Mythbusting courtesy of
@Todd_Sohn
via yesterday's
@CMTAssociation
webinar.
For all the talk about rampant pessimism, retail still loves stocks.
Household equity exposure remained above its long-term average all of last year and has increased over the past two months.
It is hard (for me at least) to look at this fund flow data and conclude that there was not at least some degree of panic that occurred in December - Equity funds had outflows of nearly $100 billion over the past four weeks.
Payrolls & unemployment rates don't tell much about where the economy is headed.
Average weekly hours are the only part of today's employment report considered a leading indicator.
Decline there has accelerated in recent months.
Not looking very soft landing-ish.
Sentiment on gold has completely reversed from where it was this summer (when gold was hitting new all time highs). Pessimism at its most extreme since Aug 2018 (when gold was at $1200/oz). $GLD
Plenty of focus on Emerging Markets ($EEM) finally surpassing the 2007 peak last week. Think its equally important to look at it relative to S&P 500 ($SPY) where a reversal of a decade-long downtrend appears to have only just begun.
48% of trading days in 2022 saw a 1% swing on the S&P 500 & 92% had new lows > new highs.
Going back 5+ decades, that was an unprecedented combination of volatility & weakness.
Lots of focus on the S&P 500 & it's 200-day average in recent days.
Over the past couple of decades, whether the average is rising or falling has mattered a lot more than whether the index is above or below it.
50% of days in 2022 have had the S&P 500 move +/-1% or more.
Fewer than 10% of days have seen new highs > new lows.
Strength & volatility tend to be inversely correlated over time.
When market trend turns higher, it should be volatility down and strength up.
If the patterns of history hold, we are likely to see a bull market in bonds before we see a bull market in stocks.
Right now, it's persistent downtrends in bonds, stocks and commodities.
Today was the 8th day in a row with new lows > new highs and the S&P 500 moving less than 1%. That’s the longest stretch since 2018 and fifth longest in the past quarter century.
Persistently quiet weakness is a market anomaly.
If you're looking for market rallies to be sustained while more stocks are making new lows than new highs (which is currently the case), you’re fighting the tape.
No need to overthink or overreact to specific $SPX levels.
We continue to see new highs > new lows (27 days in a row is longest stretch since mid-2021) and that is bull market behavior.
Friday's 9-to-1 up day was followed by a 14-to-1 up day yesterday.
Argues that downside momentum has been broken and puts our bull market re-birth checklist now at 1 out of 5.
Finishing the week with VIX < 28.5 and net new high A/D line still falling.
That leaves our VIX-Breadth Tactical Model with a negative reading.
Since 1990 that has been case 25% of the time, during which the S&P 500 has lost 40% of its value.
We are coming out of the most protracted period of pessimism in the history of the AAII survey.
When persistent pessimism has faded in the past, it's usually been good news for stocks.
We’re at 7 days in a row without a 1% swing in the S&P 500 - that matches the longest such stretch we’ve seen since Nov 2021.
Bear markets are characterized by day-to-day price volatility. Bull markets are characterized by extended periods of relative calm.
Plenty of wailing and gnashing of teeth over weakness in tech land this week, meanwhile 75% of stocks in Financials sector hit new 52-week highs - the most in at least a decade.
It gets dismissed because it doesn't fit with the narrative, but new lows > new highs (13 weeks and counting) is not typically consistent with bull market behavior.
Over at the NASDAQ:
-95% of the trading days in the past 3 months have seen more new lows than new highs.
-Nearly half (45%) of stocks in the composite have been cut in half.
-$NDX is 15% below its Nov peak.
Can't we stop pretending & just call it a bear market at this point.
Don't mean to ruffle feathers with everyone gawking at where stocks & indexes are relative to 200-day averages, but here is a contrarian view of breadth:
Over the past three years nearly all net gains in $SPX have come when fewer than 61% of stocks were > 200-d avg.