My First R Package: Dec.5-6 I'm super excited to announce that I'll soon be teaching a short course on how to develop #RStats packages! A 📦can make your code more efficient, reproducible, and helpful to others. Please let me know if you have any questions.

@LeoBaccini That's all fine but, fundamentally, I'm not convinced that the president is actually looking for policy concessions. And I worry that spending more CAD in these areas will embolden further extortion attempts.

@robertwiblin Ungated early version at OSF:

@ToniSoto_Vigo Yes! @stephenjwild tracked down the original quote behind this paraphrase of Dawid (1985).

RT @StatHorizons: Struggling with complex statistical results? Watch the first hour of @VincentAB’s "Interpreting and Communicating Statist…

@noahzucker @Princeton @PUPolitics @LSEIRDept That's amazing news. Congratulations!!

@kaw_355 There is a very easy and well-documented strategy to revert back to {kableExtra} if you want. I do not recommend doing that in new projects, but it can be useful for backward compatibility in old code. See here:

@ohtanilson @mixingale That said, I strongly recommend you use the new table format. There are very good reasons to switch to tinytable, I think. But for backward compatibility with old code, the options linked above are useful!

@ohtanilson @mixingale You can easily revert to the previous behaviour, as is documented here:

@Eduardo42655354 @gt_package No, but the `modelsummary` package can output a `gt` object instead of the default. Look at the `output` argument.

@stephenjwild @ryancbriggs Might have to change my name to Vincent A. Bryan

RT @jon_mellon: If it feels like survey experiments are taking over top journals, you're not wrong!

RT @ryancbriggs: In the most recent year, about 1/5 articles in AJPS and JOP had a survey experiment. (preliminary result from work in prog…

@regressiondisco @JohnHolbein1 lol

@mixingale You can change the default output back to kableExtra using global options (this is documented). But I do recommend you switch to the new `tinytable` output.

@komuro_dot_com FYI, here's a more developed version of that idea:

@adrialuz Thanks for the note! I think you're right: seems like a typo. I'll collect a list of errors here:

@carlislerainey Weird paper. I empathize with the elitism concern, and applaud the authors for raising that concern. But the costs of PAP seem overstated, and the authors' reading of people's motivation to run multiple experiment feels uncharitable.