Dan Profile Banner
Dan Profile
Dan

@TonFTP

Followers
836
Following
1,930
Media
1,480
Statuses
11,099

I am currently leaning towards that I am a conservative libertarian with some anarchist tendencies.

Joined March 2013
Don't wanna be here? Send us removal request.
Explore trending content on Musk Viewer
Pinned Tweet
@TonFTP
Dan
7 months
4
4
8
@TonFTP
Dan
8 months
@johnmellencamp It's not "silly political games", the 2A is an explicit restriction on the government. A government which is supposed to only exercise authority on the specifically enumerated powers. Continued weakening of the 2A puts the entire bill of rights at risk. If the government gets
158
45
888
@TonFTP
Dan
9 months
@garykoepnick The electoral college is a feature not a bug. If you were in IT (I am) you would almost certainly oppose online voting. I think it should be paper ballots with maybe simple air-gaped tabulators. The entire world would be trying to hack our elections if we had online voting.
78
13
729
@TonFTP
Dan
10 months
@SenSchumer The government has no such authority. The 2A explicitly denies the the Federal government any authority over the people's right to keep and bear arms. The 14A extends most of this to the States. The Federal government can not regulate or infringe on the Bill of Rights which is
Tweet media one
24
47
645
@TonFTP
Dan
10 months
@OV_Breezy @gunpolicy You are advocating for violation of the 2A, 4A, & 9A rights of your fellow citizens. Sounds to me like you're a traitor.
9
5
563
@TonFTP
Dan
1 year
@Travis_in_Flint And the bank isn't the one complaining. Why wouldn't whatever the deal was be between the bank and Trump? Why is it any of the governments business, and where are they deriving this oversight authority from?
155
29
420
@TonFTP
Dan
1 year
@9mm_smg It would appear that John Adams was correct: “Our constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other.” -John Adams
3
35
399
@TonFTP
Dan
9 months
@keithboykin The federeal government is doing a whole lot of unconstitutional things far beyond its intended scope. It is supposed to be hard to pass laws/regulations. Only the legislature has the power to make laws and when agency rules/regs have the power of law, that in of itself is
4
10
350
@TonFTP
Dan
10 months
@MrMsWoW @gunpolicy Rights do not require justifications.
1
1
335
@TonFTP
Dan
9 months
@RepRoKhanna He is one of the primary causes for most all the problems we face today.
8
2
330
@TonFTP
Dan
1 year
@GaylaMcGill5 @Rogers4Texas @migman24 If only the DNC cared about the constitution, freedom, and resistance to tyranny over their desire for power, control, and their irrational fears.
2
4
310
@TonFTP
Dan
11 months
@LordRancidPants @stillgray It's far more about the disrespect than it is the thing. The thing is often something that required work & debt to obtain. When someone comes in and says fuck your things, they are also saying fuck your effort. What appears to be about a thing, is not always entirely accurate.
7
3
293
@TonFTP
Dan
11 months
@GretchenCarlson @benshapiro @Mediaite @shannonrwatts You are insufferable. You have no authority over my rights.
1
2
290
@TonFTP
Dan
1 year
@TimRunsHisMouth @benandjerrys I am shocked they aren't leading by example.
8
5
262
@TonFTP
Dan
11 months
@RepPressley Congress has not been granted the authority to do so in 'Article I, section 8', thus lack said authority (9A & 10A), they are also explicitly denied such authority (2A).
1
9
241
@TonFTP
Dan
10 months
@JohnFeinblatt I am going to have to ask you to delete this tweet and wait 7 days to exercise your right to speak (1A). I am assuming you have already acquired a permit to speak and undergone the federal background check to ensure you haven't previously committed slander or libel. If not, you
6
16
240
@TonFTP
Dan
1 year
@Everytown In reality, he was held accountable and a jury determined he was not guilty of the crimes he was charged with.
3
3
204
@TonFTP
Dan
9 months
@ATFHQ @usmayors The bill of rights, being an explicit restriction on the federal government. The 2A explicitly states the right of the people...shall not be infringed. The 10A explicitly states the federal government only has the powers they are granted. How are you anything more than a
Tweet media one
4
8
205
@TonFTP
Dan
9 months
@triggerpod Should the government ______? No.
6
5
182
@TonFTP
Dan
9 months
@RepRaskin @SenMarkey The 2A does in fact protect militias from federal government infringement. States have some authority over that matter, but the federal government has none. You do have authority over the 10 sq/miles of D.C.
8
12
175
@TonFTP
Dan
1 year
@Mrgunsngear End qualified immunity End legislative immunity End sovereign Immunity End judicial immunity Violators of civil rights should not have special protections.
6
6
167
@TonFTP
Dan
7 months
@alanfranklin Here's a concept. If an eight-hour course and live-speech exercise make it "nearly impossible" for you to obtain a freedom of speech permit... You shouldn't have one. #copolitics #coleg
2
1
166
@TonFTP
Dan
10 months
@DisneyPlus I thought you guys were leaving? Or is it just the ads? I mean, if you are truly morally outraged, you should leave the platform entirely. Not do the free advertising via posts thing.
3
5
158
@TonFTP
Dan
9 months
@CameronTousi @CRozemond @theliamnissan @RobProvince The bill of rights is explicitly a restriction on the government. The federal government has never, nor currently has any constitutional authority over the people's right to keep and bear arms. The states have had the restrictions to government in the bill of rights applied to
Tweet media one
2
3
162
@TonFTP
Dan
8 months
@BasedMikeLee All sides are getting this very wrong. SCOTUS vacated the order stopping the federal government. They made no opinion on TX. So TX can still do what it is doing presumably(they could get stopped later), but the fed govt can also come in and remove things legally.
11
25
162
@TonFTP
Dan
10 months
@KrisB_Brown Congress has not been granted the authority to do so in 'Article I, section 8', thus lack said authority (10A), they are also explicitly denied such authority (2A). The 2A does nothing more than explicitly deny the the Federal government any authority over the peoples right to
2
8
158
@TonFTP
Dan
9 months
@DogginTrump @3YearLetterman @GavinNewsom If we brought one of the founding fathers to current time, they would have no issues understanding the AR-15 and how it operates. They would be far less likely to understand the internet, global communication, TV, radio, cell phones. Yet the 1A applies to all those.
5
1
153
@TonFTP
Dan
8 months
@KimlerForSC What is the bill of rights? A set of declaratory and restrictive clauses for the government. Declarative statement: A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State Restrictive statement: The right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be
Tweet media one
5
15
152
@TonFTP
Dan
9 months
@funder Just because a bunch of people called it an insurrection does not in fact make it an insurrection.
8
1
153
@TonFTP
Dan
10 months
@MrMsWoW @gunpolicy I am in no way triggered. Your question is just not relevant.
1
0
144
@TonFTP
Dan
10 months
@KamalaHarris Congress has not been granted the authority to do so in 'Article I, section 8', thus lack said authority (10A), they are also explicitly denied such authority (2A).
5
8
142
@TonFTP
Dan
1 year
@kadamssl I'm confused, you are still doing this? As in, July 17th, 2023? Or is this a re-post? Did twitter break dates?
4
1
136
@TonFTP
Dan
1 year
@ComicDaveSmith Calling out the double standard does not automatically mean the right wants it to be treated like J6, we want it to be equal. So many on the left lose the plot when they think being opposed to something or being for something means wanting the government to intervene.
5
4
140
@TonFTP
Dan
10 months
@ProgPolAdvisor The Bill of Rights explicitly is restrictions on the government. The 2A is part of the bill of rights. Who's right shall not be infringed in the 2nd amendment? "...,the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed."
Tweet media one
2
4
132
@TonFTP
Dan
11 months
@SF_DPH Ah yes, filing the appropriate paper work and paying a fee is what keeps it safe...
1
0
135
@TonFTP
Dan
7 months
@DelDanHelmer Oath-breaking traitors.
5
1
130
@TonFTP
Dan
10 months
@KamalaHarris Congress has not been granted the authority to do so in 'Article I, section 8', thus lack said authority (10A), they are also explicitly denied such authority (2A).
1
4
126
@TonFTP
Dan
2 years
@RSPolitics If twitter enforces it's rules in a politically neutral way, how does his personal recommendation change that? How do you feel about newspapers recommending candidates?
4
0
121
@TonFTP
Dan
11 months
@Ally_Sammarco I do not consent to your "protection"
Tweet media one
1
8
119
@TonFTP
Dan
1 year
@ladymegofthemw Keep in mind, we are distracted by thoughts of Rome frequently as well.
4
4
108
@TonFTP
Dan
9 months
@BarnwellSmith @MomsDemand @Everytown @amybett By safe you mean well armed, correct?
0
1
115
@TonFTP
Dan
1 year
@libertysafeinc You could have not had access codes available by either not having a bypass code or not retaining records, which ever is applicable. You could have stayed out of a legal matter between the government and a citizen. You chose to have a bypass methods AND default side with the
1
9
105
@TonFTP
Dan
8 months
@helloimdansmith @gunpolicy Milder restrictions, like the unconstitutional gun laws currently in existence?
0
1
111
@TonFTP
Dan
10 months
@VeganFraser @Tactical_review @Veganella_ Are you equally bothered by lions eating zebras?
3
0
104
@TonFTP
Dan
1 year
@beinlibertarian I think they recently switched to only manufacturing boat anchors now.
3
1
97
@TonFTP
Dan
11 months
@RepSwalwell It may suck, but you still can't have my rights.
11
1
93
@TonFTP
Dan
10 months
@DylanMAllman It's an interesting point. Consider: the fact that we are still stuck here for our remaining time without said loved ones?
1
0
90
@TonFTP
Dan
9 months
@ABQJournal No. The government lacks any such authority.
0
0
88
@TonFTP
Dan
10 months
@SenMarkKelly Congress has not been granted the authority to do so in 'Article I, section 8', thus lack said authority (10A), they are also explicitly denied such authority (2A). The 2A does nothing more than explicitly deny the the Federal government any authority over the peoples right to
2
3
96
@TonFTP
Dan
1 year
0
0
90
@TonFTP
Dan
1 year
@SnarkedUpLawyer @espinsegall What do the 1st, 4th, 9th, and 10th amendments mean by "the people"? Who's rights shall not be infringed in the 2nd amendment? "...the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed"
4
0
89
@TonFTP
Dan
9 months
@LosAngelesATF @Jrod1814 If you enforce unconstitutional laws, you are no longer government and are a criminal organization. I assume you took a similar oath?
Tweet media one
0
5
91
@TonFTP
Dan
9 months
@SentinelColo The government lacks the authority to implement your personal desires. Get over it.
0
1
88
@TonFTP
Dan
9 months
@NMPGVnow I mean...I would recommend, in your defense, that all federal gun laws are facially unconstitutional. But those laws do exist, and those laws are enforced.
2
0
88
@TonFTP
Dan
11 months
@newrepublic @colindickey Never going to give up my fundamental rights. You are the bad guys for trying to do so.
0
0
90
@TonFTP
Dan
1 year
@Nate_McMurray @NRA The *right* of "the people", also seen in the 1st, 4th, 9th, and 10th amendments.
0
1
85
@TonFTP
Dan
10 months
@nhannahjones So government bureaucrats should determine who deserves the tax income, taken by force, from the working citizenship? How about: No.
1
2
87
@TonFTP
Dan
8 months
@yourTjustWorse @Autumn__Fox @jdkahler If you don't want 18 to be adult, make it 21. Just do it for everything, including voting. I would support that. You will need a constitutional amendment to replace 26A. I don't think the government should be involved in any private transactions/trade, the federal government
Tweet media one
2
4
84
@TonFTP
Dan
1 year
@RepSpanberger Was unconstitutional then and it's unconstitutional now. Government had not been granted authority to infringe on the pre-existing fundamental right to keep and bear arms and has actually been explicitly denied any such authority. Your story doesn't mean anything.
5
3
75
@TonFTP
Dan
10 months
@culliton_hugh @TWilsonOttawa Rights do not require justifications.
1
0
74
@TonFTP
Dan
10 months
Tweet media one
5
1
82
@TonFTP
Dan
1 year
@jenniferkrneta @midwestern_ope I think that is also used when you haven't been paying attention and after asking a question, realizing the question makes no sense and have now caught back up with the conversation you should have been paying attention to. (Or after you had completely missed their point/meaning)
1
1
86
@TonFTP
Dan
1 year
@SenDuckworth You don't have that authority. The government was not explicitly granted it so you don't have it (9A & 10A). You are also specially barred from infringing that right (2A). This is also applicable to the individual states (14A).
4
1
76
@TonFTP
Dan
8 months
@TRHLofficial Boiling a frog alive tends to lose its effectiveness when you make a sudden change to the heat.
0
2
82
@TonFTP
Dan
10 months
@RepDianaDeGette The government lacks any such authority. The 2A explicitly denies the the Federal government (all branches) any authority over the people's right to keep and bear arms. The 14A extends most of this to the States. The Federal government can not regulate or infringe on the Bill
Tweet media one
1
3
82
@TonFTP
Dan
1 year
@reddit_lies He is close enough to bike to a store, but not close enough to bike to a farm. It's a good thing grocery stores produce their own food in the backroom.
7
1
77
@TonFTP
Dan
11 months
@RedxRedxWhine @mom1398 @toooomanytweets @Stillhere4744 @Nguyen_anime3 @SindyReyes423 @NguyeningISGood @DravinMalis @Gameove35593168 @soloer101 @hailstone92 @d_t_1_7 @Acehendrix164 @Annabel99631466 @Doxy6661 @GlareKal Arms. Arms covers all weapons, weapon parts, ammunition, etc. Arms also includes knives, armor, etc. The 2A doesn't grant rights, it restricts the government from infringing on a preexisting right.
3
1
73
@TonFTP
Dan
11 months
@KrisB_Brown The first 20 pages of the manual are all warnings....
1
0
80
@TonFTP
Dan
10 months
@Rep_Stansbury Congress has not been granted the authority to do so in 'Article I, section 8', thus lack said authority (10A), they are also explicitly denied such authority (2A).
0
0
76
@TonFTP
Dan
11 months
@BenFrank1788 Particularly at the Federal level they are double without any authority: Congress has not been granted the authority to do so in 'Article I, section 8', thus lack said authority (9A & 10A), they are also explicitly denied such authority (2A).
1
0
74
@TonFTP
Dan
9 months
@thejohnboymyers @kylegriffin1 I am sorry that would make you NOT: -Pro-gun -Pro 2A & 14A -Pro constitution -Pro Bill of Rights + 14A
2
0
72
@TonFTP
Dan
9 months
@ashleyruba_phd If you spend 10 years specializing in a niche field, it should not come as a shock that said field will have a limited number of jobs. If the job is not of particular value to very many on top of it, you can't really expect someone to create a pretend job for you.
1
2
76
@TonFTP
Dan
9 months
@DanRiffle No. Go mind your own business for a change and stop trying to use the government to control everyone the way you see fit.
0
0
76
@TonFTP
Dan
9 months
@SaraAGiussani Rights do not require justifications.
1
2
72
@TonFTP
Dan
8 months
@Alphafox78 Nothing, looks like some free speech being done over the free speech on the road.
4
1
72
@TonFTP
Dan
10 months
@StarTribune Those are all pretty awful.
1
0
76
@TonFTP
Dan
11 months
@SenDuckworth Congress has not been granted the authority to do so in 'Article I, section 8', thus lack said authority (9A & 10A), they are also explicitly denied such authority (2A).
2
3
70
@TonFTP
Dan
11 months
@AMarch4OurLives It's more gun control that spurs sales. Your push for unconstitutional laws is one of the biggest drivers.
1
1
72
@TonFTP
Dan
7 months
@BarbraStreisand Uh, each state gets to decide now. If your state decides "wrong" vote in different state reps.
4
1
72
@TonFTP
Dan
8 months
@nixcraft Don't force me to socialize to initial test the project.
0
0
74
@TonFTP
Dan
9 months
@RepJohnLarson I introduced the Assault Weapons Water Accountability Act because many mass shooters use water to hydrate. By banning the use of water to hydrate, we can help save lives.
2
6
69
@TonFTP
Dan
10 months
@Everytown The Federal government can not regulate or infringe on the Bill of Rights which is in place to regulate/restrict the government. (1A-10A) The Federal government has no authority which it has not specifically been given in the constitution. (10A) As amendments modify the
Tweet media one
1
4
69
@TonFTP
Dan
7 months
@MinOakland @Tactical_review You can have your rights removed by a court with due process, you do not have to prove something prior to exercising a right. If we had psychological screening for the 1A the left would be barred from speech.
2
0
69
@TonFTP
Dan
1 year
@SenatorDurbin I'll clear it up, the federal government has no such authority.
1
1
67
@TonFTP
Dan
9 months
@RepLaLota The 1A restricts the government from interfering in the right. "hate speech" is most certainly covered. Congress is explicitly denied any authority over speech.
2
4
66
@TonFTP
Dan
10 months
@Elizag123410 @CarrieC75701474 @PrezLives2022 What do the 1st, 4th, 9th, and 10th amendments mean by "the people"? Who's right shall not be infringed in the 2nd amendment? "...,the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed" The Bill of Rights is explicitly restrictions on the government.
Tweet media one
1
1
66
@TonFTP
Dan
1 year
@Ragland1836 On your other post about @9mm_smg , this is substantially more offensive than what you quoted him saying. I don't really care either way, just saying.
3
0
57
@TonFTP
Dan
1 year
@samschwartz03 There is no such thing as "hate speech" and it would in fact be protected. The 2A may not cover bombs, missiles, grenades, etc. It definitely covers semi-auto arms. The results of a poll are irrelevant to what is or is not covered by the 2A.
7
0
63
@TonFTP
Dan
11 months
@tedlieu @Dorf73256527 What does the first 7 words of the constitution mean by "the people"? What do the 1st, 4th, 9th, and 10th amendments mean by "the people"? What does 'Article I, Section 2', 'Article VII', and the 17th amendment mean by "the people". Who's rights shall not be infringed in the
4
3
62
@TonFTP
Dan
10 months
@atothej428 @Rensontwitts @bugme143 @RebRod @RyanShead @GayresisterGary Hate to break it to you, but the government doesn't have the authority to infringe on the preexisting right. The document that limits and restricts them is the same document from which they derive all their power and authority. The Federal government can not regulate or
Tweet media one
0
0
61
@TonFTP
Dan
10 months
@brixwe I am still annoyed they used the term "saltwater" instead of saline to make it sound worse.
2
2
58
@TonFTP
Dan
1 year
@Nate_McMurray What do the 1st, 4th, 9th, and 10th amendments mean by "the people"? Who's rights shall not be infringed in the 2nd amendment? "...the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed" What does 'Article I, Section 2', 'Article VII', and the 17th amendment
4
2
60
@TonFTP
Dan
1 year
0
0
64
@TonFTP
Dan
8 months
@TulsiGabbardrep Where do I get me one of those 90° adapters?
9
0
64
@TonFTP
Dan
9 months
@WCCO Complete disregard for individual rights...
5
0
61
@TonFTP
Dan
1 year
@khathaway1 @MomsDemand What sort of people do you think will obey that sign? What sort of people do you think will ignore it? It would seem to me that the very people who would obey this sign are the exact sort of people who you would want armed and on premises. The people who will ignore that sign
1
0
59
@TonFTP
Dan
1 year
@Ty22Best @tedcruz Please do. If I was in the area I would appreciate the heads up to not spend my dollars there.
6
0
65
@TonFTP
Dan
8 months
@graycie8983 @currermell @K12ssdb What is the bill of rights? A set of declaratory and restrictive clauses aimed at the federal government. Declarative statement: A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State Restrictive statement: The right of the people to keep and bear Arms,
Tweet media one
2
5
62
@TonFTP
Dan
10 months
@97Percentorg The 2A does nothing more than explicitly deny the the Federal government any authority over the peoples right to keep and bear arms. The 14A extends most of this to States. You can't regulate the thing that is place to regulate the government.
0
2
55
@TonFTP
Dan
1 year
@Casey35935962 @GregAbbott_TX It would likely be manslaughter, they will get out eventually. Also, a portion of any work program they do in prison would go towards it.
4
1
58