flimflamfan Profile
flimflamfan

@SaucePieJones

Followers
33
Following
10K
Statuses
1K

Joined May 2024
Don't wanna be here? Send us removal request.
@SaucePieJones
flimflamfan
2 hours
@LeeKurtiss @DavidKlion She has a sexual orientation. Non-bigots are oriented not towards any particular sex but towards certain kinds of invisible, inner, subjective senses of gendery vibes.
2
0
1
@SaucePieJones
flimflamfan
4 hours
@DPJHodges People are rarely hostile simply because someone "identifies" as the opposite sex. It's the unreasonable demands & the dishonest interpretations of all criticism. "You object to my mere existence!", "You deny my existence!", "You want me dead!". And it's all the other insults too
0
0
0
@SaucePieJones
flimflamfan
12 hours
@DCapeloS @LauraGr31918310 @sgcafan @HPluckrose Everyone participating in the conversation I'm participating in is an idiot who is wasting their time! You'll never catch me in a conversation like the one I'm in. I've got better things to do than write this post, the one before, the one before that or the one before that ...
0
0
0
@SaucePieJones
flimflamfan
13 hours
@DCapeloS @HPluckrose Doesn’t the EO also address high school sports? I’ll have to double check
0
0
0
@SaucePieJones
flimflamfan
13 hours
@DCapeloS @LauraGr31918310 @sgcafan @HPluckrose Nobody really subscribes to the principle of “Only Talk About the Most Important Things”. Even those who pretend only do it for a moment while it’s rhetorically convenient. Imagine trying to shut down every conversation about sports with “WHAT ABOUT RAPE & WAR & MALARIA?!”
0
0
0
@SaucePieJones
flimflamfan
1 day
@SohailSNAhmed If you have a list of recommended readings on the topic, I'd appreciate your sharing. Or just a couple that you found most illuminating.
0
0
0
@SaucePieJones
flimflamfan
1 day
@KYHSHistory @JuliaMasonMD1 It would be silly to prioritize the tiny number of TW athletes over the much larger number of female athletes negatively impacted by their inclusion in women’s sports. TRAs making so much hay over the small number of TW athletes lately is one of their worst self-owns
0
0
3
@SaucePieJones
flimflamfan
1 day
@RealHousewifeMi @theKristinjoy Are you always this concerned about executive orders being an inefficient use of government resources? Seems like you’re having a moral panic attack over this one
0
0
0
@SaucePieJones
flimflamfan
1 day
@RealHousewifeMi @KnownHeretic Fake outrage? You think people are just pretending to believe that males have an athletic advantage & shouldn’t be in women’s sports? That’s weird
0
0
1
@SaucePieJones
flimflamfan
1 day
@glosswitch As maddening as it is, I do have to laugh sometimes, especially when they frame themselves as an extension of the Civil Rights movement. "I'm like Martin Luther King Jr but for showing my junk to women instead of racial integration & equality" - the Wi Spa guy probably.
0
0
4
@SaucePieJones
flimflamfan
1 day
@sgcafan @DCapeloS @HPluckrose Wait do you think the sports EO is used as a justification for banning gender affirming care? I haven't heard that one before. I figured it was because of all the systematic reviews or because of WPATH got caught suppressing research or changing guidelines to appease Levine
0
0
0
@SaucePieJones
flimflamfan
1 day
@sgcafan @DCapeloS @HPluckrose How is it "going after" trans people in general? I thought you said it only affects a few of them. It sounds like you're criticizing something other than excluding TWs from women's sports.
0
0
2
@SaucePieJones
flimflamfan
1 day
@sgcafan @DCapeloS @HPluckrose Great. So only a few trans women will feel invalidated for being excluded. Not sure what all the fuss was about.
1
0
1
@SaucePieJones
flimflamfan
1 day
@DCapeloS @HPluckrose I'm not up for helping you find your ideological teammates but I wish you luck if that's your goal. I'm more interested in understanding your shared rhetoric & arguments. So, why would a small number of TWs athletes count in favor of including them in women's sports?
0
0
6
@SaucePieJones
flimflamfan
1 day
@ArtemisConsort They take a word from its context, reframe it w/ obviously different context & meaning & feign outrage “Don’t count black people? Blacks don’t count? So Black Lives Don’t MATTER?!” Maybe “control for race” is next. “Control a race? You’re the master? And they’re your SLAVES?!”
0
0
0
@SaucePieJones
flimflamfan
2 days
@AndyHerren “It is not up for debate” That’s not up to you. The debate is already happening. you’re losing because the other side has more convincing receipts. Declaring “no debate” might help you cope but it reinforces TRAs well earned rep for intellectual dishonesty & willful ignorance
0
2
6
@SaucePieJones
flimflamfan
2 days
@APmith It's not the genitals; it's the athletic advantage provided by male development, which accounts for differences in bone density, connective tissue stiffness, mass/fat ratio, cardio & respiratory capacity, & hemoglobin concentration. And these affect athletic performance.
0
0
1
@SaucePieJones
flimflamfan
2 days
@esjesjesj Right?! I don't know why trans activists have been freaking out over a mere 40 males being excluded from women's sports. Maybe panic is the preferred state for some? It seems like some even incorporate panic as part of their identity
0
0
0
@SaucePieJones
flimflamfan
2 days
@glennagoldis Do you have a sense of which false claims are likely to matter in this case? From a legally naive pov, I'd love to see the science of gender care litigated & thoroughly exposed for the hogwash it is. But I know it doesn't always work like that
0
0
1