![Matthew Rance Profile](https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/537730004785037312/P8VF3kr2_x96.jpeg)
Matthew Rance
@RanceMatt
Followers
239
Following
9K
Statuses
1K
Data, Privacy & Technology. Head of Commercial Data & Analytics at Immediate Media
England, United Kingdom
Joined August 2012
@This_Liss This really ought to go without saying but if ads were inherently worthless, then brands wouldn’t spend billions every year sustaining this model. All the time humans exists and there are products and services to offer, attention (I.e. advertising) will be in high demand
0
0
0
@SimonJHarris @IABEurope This is great. Out of all of these, I can see no.3 being the real area of contention and let’s say push back from the EDPB & regional regulators. Thus far the argument re fees have been so intrinsically linked to the concept of a fair and genuine alternative under the GDPR
1
0
1
@eric_seufert V interesting but I think that’s why when this product was first announced they tried to be so clear with messaging that NOTHING will affect the objectivity of results. The irony to these models is they are generative and by definition same prompts can produce different outputs!
0
0
0
@Dostoevskyquot Notes from the underground. Both due to its length and since it reflects so much of the commons Dostoevsky themes
0
0
0
@airgups23 @AdtechGod I don’t know but you’re so busted and those quads could kick you into next week
1
0
2
@douglauretano @EricTilbury_RTB Does it make any different on what side it’s being done? E.g. if DSP does it on behalf of advertiser vs if publisher does it on behalf of SSP (and therefore DSP/advertiser)?
2
0
0
@grau_toene @cybrtrkguy @elonmusk Unfortunately this isn’t quite the case. Most ads require consent for basic purposes like validating whether you saw an ad and precisely who saw it. Without it, most advertisers and (more importantly) technologies won’t serve an advert
0
0
0
@NathanThomas456 @EricTilbury_RTB Would you define a 50/50 split between doing my agency directors expenses and manually approving YouTube content creator videos for the client as in the trenches? 😂
2
0
2
@gaborgurbacs @elonmusk Ha, I don’t think there was ever an obligation to follow us nor could we ever command such power. I believe it’s a measure to give greater control over consumer online privacy
0
0
0
@cybrtrkguy @elonmusk Nice in theory but in practise this removes all autonomy from media owners who rely on consent as a currency for providing the ad funded, free and open internet. Removing control puts great risk to these models which ultimately form an important aspect of our democracy
1
0
0
@AlexFinnX @elonmusk When you say useless law which one are you referencing specifically? In the UK for example they are a requirement under GDPR in order to collect consent to process personal data. It’s therefore in consumers interests, even if slightly annoying in reality
1
0
3
@SimonJHarris @eric_seufert Interesting to see the response from EDPB on the use of basic data like gender and whether seen as a genuine alternative to fully Personalised option since this is ultimately also a personalised ads option and requiring consent. That there is a 3rd pay option might now be enough
0
0
1
@eric_seufert Worse for Meta, consumers and brands (who advertise via LPA). 2nd large change from Meta so if the EU deems this insufficient I’m not sure what their next play is?
0
0
1
Looking forward to contributing to this straightforward and totally uncontroversial topic of consent or pay in advertising…
Want greater control over privacy? Join @InMobi’s Sai Manoj Sistla, @IABEurope’s Ninon Vagner, @axelspringer_EN’s Robert Blanck, & @immediate_media’s Matthew Rance at #InternationalSummit as they dive into the ‘Consent or Pay’ model! #NothingWillBeTheSame
0
0
0
RT @anthonykatsur: Time is running out to register for the @IABTechLab International Summit. We'll be discussing PETs and bringing a pet to…
0
3
0