Quassim Cassam
@QCassam
Followers
9K
Following
12K
Statuses
2K
Professor of Philosophy at Warwick University. FBA. Latest book: Extremism: A Philosophical Analysis. Six previous books including Vices of the Mind.
Coventry, England
Joined January 2015
Published today, my book on extremism. A neglected topic in philosophy, but an important one. Thanks to @anthonyjbruce for getting me to write this and to some excellent referees, including @RikPeels
12
58
266
RT @LSEpoliticsblog: š”New! Keir Starmer has ordered a review of the definition of terrorism in response to the Southport murders. ButĀ @QCasā¦
0
5
0
RT @hoffman_bruce: I often tell my students that what is so fascinating about studying terrorism is that a fiction thriller writer could neā¦
0
1K
0
RT @afalkhatib: Hamas's methodology: fight in flip-flops & civilian clothes, hide in schools, hospitals, tunnels, set up aid theft/lootingā¦
0
3K
0
RT @terrorwatchdog: Good to see government statement on designing new measures to divert young people involved in terrorism away from arresā¦
0
3
0
RT @LordWalney: Delighted that my review on political violence and disruption has been now laid before parliament
0
73
0
RT @iainmartin1: Trump is about to demand as high as 5% of GDP on defence and settle for 3.5%, is the word. Yet something v strange is happā¦
0
115
0
RT @LordWalney: Thinking of Jewish students in the wake of this sustained campaign of violence and intimidation by Palestine Action. Minisā¦
0
137
0
RT @NomiClaireLazar: Fascinating discussion on democratic resilience in the foreign interference context. My thanks to @QCassam @stphnmaherā¦
0
3
0
@EskandarSadeghi I suspect that many were yearning for liberation from Sinwar and his gang of genocidal psychopaths
2
0
1
Spot on.
Reading a couple of @theguardian articles in a last few days, I feel we may be seeing its final departure from the pluralistic liberal tradition that made it a great newspaper, thanks to its capture by ā or its morally fuddled editorial cadre - surrender to, an activist, ideological, anti-Western and more than that, anti-factual front. Our liberal democracy needs institutions of pluralistic discourse like this once-hallowed paper but it also requires a respect for facts and some sense of morals. Facts were once the essential ingredients of the coverage of a paper like the Guardian. However at least there are comedic sides to this. Two recent articles exemplify the Guardianās embrace of illiberal anti democratic, anti fact forces and at the same time represent āa bonfire of the vanitiesā (an appropriate quotation from Savonarola who used the phrase to launch a bloodspattered but absurdly self-righteous purge of Florence that ended with his own execution.) Todayās was a truly creepy review of the One Day in October documentary, by a comedy-writer Stuart Jeffries, on the October 7 Hamas massacres who seemed irritated and uneasy that the real record of the atrocities by Hamas and some Gazan civilians, gleefully documented by the killers themselves on GoPros and smart-phones, did not accord with his and the Guardianās political prejudices. How could these impertinent film-makers present these killers, decapitators, rapists, body-mutilators, corpse-abusers, kidnappers and looters as baddies? That is against the simplistic, rigid, flimsy framework of the ideology of anti-Israeli decolonization and must be wrong! This uncomfortable fact must be corrected! The result: a piece of unintentional, amoral gallows comedy at the Guardian's expense. The other was equally embarrassing and morally tone-deaf: a comically self-important and self-reverential but ugly and historically ignorant essay claiming the Israelis were guilty of memoralizing their October 7 fallen (so unlike every society, ever, in history from the 300 of the Spartans to the West with WW1 Armistice Day, the West and Russia with WW2, The Holodomor by Ukrainians, the Holocaust by the Jews, the Nakba by Palestinians, 9/11 by Americans and so on) by the clumsy Canadian provocateur Naomi Klein, all but indistinguishable from her alter-ego and fellow solipsist the other Naomi. As I posted this amidst general contempt for these pieces across the X platform, the paper may have taken one of them down 'pending review.' The fact is the paper has lost its heart and soul and sense of moral judgement but these preposterous pieces at least provide a sort of bleak, EndDays comedy amidst the heartbreaking civilian losses of Middle Eastern conflicts... @theguardian
@KathViner š·
0
0
9
RT @aj_wendland: 'Reflections on the Russia-Ukraine War' offers accessible academic analysis of Russia's invasion of Ukraine in order to enā¦
0
46
0
RT @smithbarryc: Fascinating and wide-ranging discussion between surgeon and researcher, Prof Roger Kneebone, and philosopher and expert oā¦
0
3
0
A wide-ranging conversation with @ProfKneebone about intellectual vices, professional virtues, general practice, the nature of expertise, and the importance of #cocreation in philosophy
0
1
13
RT @BritishAcademy_: What do we mean by 'extremism'? In this 10-Minute Talk, @QCassam explores the philosophical distinctions of ideologicaā¦
0
4
0
@SovereignWill @HetanShah I think that is possible. Maybe Tony Blair was a radical centrist but not the mirror image of a psychological extremist. Radicalism and extremism are different anyway.
0
0
2