Primary The Swamp
@PrimaryTheSwamp
Followers
111
Following
148
Statuses
324
SuperPAC for independent expenditures opposing public officeholders who hinder or oppose the 2024 America First Election Mandate. Donation info in 'Highlights'.
Rogers, AR
Joined December 2024
Some Senators are 2026, others may be 2028 or 2030. Obviously the 2026ers are the ones with which we are on a short clock. But the main purpose is to BE a credible threat in the hope of modifying TODAY'S BEHAVIOR. This is why we need to fund serious digital ad campaigns, carefully targeted for max effect. This ad is ending its useful time window, but serves as an example of what we are trying to accomplish, given sufficient awareness and donations.
0
0
1
@MacAdomis @tdmass @AesPolitics1 No kidding. Even provided the citation link from the official government website. "I do not think that word means what you think it means" LOL
0
0
0
@MorrisCalv71589 Thanks Calvin (@MorrisCalv71589) . Please help spread the word to interested people especially to anyone who may be interested in donating to the cause or further spreading the word. Please help raise awareness/funds:
0
0
0
@EndWokeness So in other words, he is on the payroll of an NGO who is likely the recipient of USAID funds. Conflict much? Not sure why I would listen to anything he has to say about the subject. And just like voting integrity issues, they love to use the modifying adjective "widespread".
0
0
1
@WallStreetApes The main purpose of those clinics' USAID funding is not to fight AIDS. They are a front for various forms of statecraft. Listen to recent interviews of Mike Benz for more information.
0
0
0
Yes but unfortunately impeaching a judge requires 2/3s in the Senate to actually convict (67). The constitution doesn't specifically speak to impeachment with respect to judges, though it's been held that the clauses on impeachment apply. However, there is a different (and I think untested standard): "The Judges, both of the supreme and inferior Courts, shall hold their Offices during good Behaviour" There is also an argument as to what authority "the inferior courts" have over the executive branch. Perhaps it requires SCOTUS to exercise such power.
0
0
0
@charliekirk11 I think Trump should at least state that as officers of the court, the attorneys who colluded in this midnight usurpation of the executive branch should face disbarment.
0
0
0
@Jim_Jordan Mr. Jordan, please make sure your peers know that there are several efforts to assure primary opposition to any GOP who hinder or obstruct the 2024 Election Mandate. Here is one such effort:
0
0
1
He didn't care. He didn't care to do too much of anything (except possibly grift, eat ice cream and hang out at the beach). Ask yourself this: If Trump could reduce illegal border crossings by 94% in 2-3 weeks, why didn't Biden? Well, for starters, Biden was literally flying them into the USA on airplanes. So obviously, HE WANTED THEM TO COME IN.
0
0
1
@BobTrice @AesPolitics1 The report is based on numbers ending December 31, 2024. See this:
Um, the inflation numbers are based on financials ending prior to Trump's inauguration (End of Dec. 2024 . So it is literally Biden admin numbers, empirically. Less black and white but also empirical for economists: you cannot solve inflation in three weeks. Example: If bacon already produced two months ago is still in the supply chain, and it is not sold for one month from now, the price of that bacon is based on costs (energy, feed, etc.) from three months before it is sold. It is literally impossible to sell bacon for the same or less until the cost of manufacture stops increasing, and then, if it is 3 months from production to market, it takes that long to see the results at the point of purchase. I know it makes for fun talking points, but talking about things from a position of ignorance always undermines one's credibility. I suggest people proceed with their rhetoric accordingly.
0
0
2
@tdmass @AesPolitics1 See this:
Um, the inflation numbers are based on financials ending prior to Trump's inauguration (End of Dec. 2024 . So it is literally Biden admin numbers, empirically. Less black and white but also empirical for economists: you cannot solve inflation in three weeks. Example: If bacon already produced two months ago is still in the supply chain, and it is not sold for one month from now, the price of that bacon is based on costs (energy, feed, etc.) from three months before it is sold. It is literally impossible to sell bacon for the same or less until the cost of manufacture stops increasing, and then, if it is 3 months from production to market, it takes that long to see the results at the point of purchase. I know it makes for fun talking points, but talking about things from a position of ignorance always undermines one's credibility. I suggest people proceed with their rhetoric accordingly.
1
0
0
Um, the inflation numbers are based on financials ending prior to Trump's inauguration (End of Dec. 2024 . So it is literally Biden admin numbers, empirically. Less black and white but also empirical for economists: you cannot solve inflation in three weeks. Example: If bacon already produced two months ago is still in the supply chain, and it is not sold for one month from now, the price of that bacon is based on costs (energy, feed, etc.) from three months before it is sold. It is literally impossible to sell bacon for the same or less until the cost of manufacture stops increasing, and then, if it is 3 months from production to market, it takes that long to see the results at the point of purchase. I know it makes for fun talking points, but talking about things from a position of ignorance always undermines one's credibility. I suggest people proceed with their rhetoric accordingly.
3
1
2
GOP Nominee vote report (per ballotpedia with Gabbard vote added): Sen. Collins - 1 vote against (Hegseth) Sen. Murkowski - 1 vote against (Hegseth) Sen. McConnell - 2 votes against (Hegseth, Gabbard) The "strikes" are adding up. We need to make it clear to McConnell that although he may not be running again, we will make his "hand-picked" replacement pay the price in his/her primary. Murkowski/Collins, SUPPORT THE 2024 ELECTION MANDATE!
0
0
0
GOP Nominee vote report (per ballotpedia with Gabbard vote added): Sen. Collins - 1 vote against (Hegseth) Sen. Murkowski - 1 vote against (Hegseth) Sen. McConnell - 2 votes against (Hegseth, Gabbard) The "strikes" are adding up. We need to make it clear to McConnell that although he may not be running again, we will make his "hand-picked" replacement pay the price in his/her primary. Murkowski/Collins, SUPPORT THE 2024 ELECTION MANDATE!
0
0
1
@MAGAVoice @SenateGOP @Kash_Patel We need to organize now for this and many issues to come. We need to put CREDIBLE pressure on any GOP who might be tempted to get squishy. Here's one way we can collaborate:
0
0
2
Its looking like there are current promising cures "they" are trying to stop. Unfortunately, most doctors are completely captured by the medical/pharma-industrial complex. My dad's doctor tried to prescribe statins to a 91 year old man with mildly high cholesterol, even though studies show that people over 50 who actively lower their cholesterol have a higher any-cause mortality rate (possibly due to cholesterol's role in the immunity system?).
0
1
0