Peter Shor Profile
Peter Shor

@PeterShor1

Followers
18,930
Following
104
Media
9
Statuses
1,100

Discovered Shor's algorithm for prime factorization on quantum computers.

Joined June 2019
Don't wanna be here? Send us removal request.
Explore trending content on Musk Viewer
@PeterShor1
Peter Shor
1 year
I've put my lecture notes from my Fall 2022 Quantum Computation course online. I don't guarantee that there aren't any mistakes left in them, although I've tried to eradicate them all. If you find any, feel free to email me.
67
951
5K
@PeterShor1
Peter Shor
4 years
True story: When I was checking into a hotel in Atlanta, GA, I was asked "Can I have your name, please." I replied "Shor." Then there was a long pause.
@gazit_lior
Lior Gazit
4 years
@PeterShor1 so which one do you like better?
Tweet media one
Tweet media two
3
14
100
16
206
2K
@PeterShor1
Peter Shor
4 years
35 years ago today, Richard Feynman's paper "Quantum Mechanical Computers" was published in 𝘖𝘱𝘵𝘪𝘤𝘴 𝘕𝘦𝘸𝘴. I think he'd be surprised and gratified to see everything that his original idea has led to.
9
304
1K
@PeterShor1
Peter Shor
3 years
40 years ago IBM and MIT held a 𝘗𝘩𝘺𝘴𝘪𝘤𝘴 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘊𝘰𝘮𝘱𝘶𝘵𝘢𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯 conference, where Feynman gave his seminal keynote address, later published in the 𝘐𝘯𝘵. 𝘑. 𝘛𝘩𝘦𝘰𝘳. 𝘗𝘩𝘺𝘴. Next Thursday, they are holding a 40th anniversary conference:
1
164
747
@PeterShor1
Peter Shor
5 years
When I was working on my quantum algorithm for factorization, I didn't tell anybody, because it seemed like such a long shot. Similarly, Wiles didn't tell anybody that he was working on Fermat's Last Theorem before he solved it, presumably for the same reason.
12
117
682
@PeterShor1
Peter Shor
11 months
Wonderful article about recent progress in theoretical cryptography and complexity theory (although we're still really a long way from proving P ≠ NP).
@QuantaMagazine
Quanta Magazine
1 year
For more than 50 years, complexity theorists have tried and failed to solve the foundational question of their field. Why is it so hard to prove hardness? @benbenbrubaker reports:
10
108
327
6
70
420
@PeterShor1
Peter Shor
3 years
To celebrate this anniversary, I have summarized Feynman's paper in 4 lines of #quantumpoetry : With our computers, we can’t model Nature; To simulate her faithfully, we must Go where she lives, and grasp her hand, and make her, With clever tricks, perform the task for us.
4
73
339
@PeterShor1
Peter Shor
5 years
I am sure lots of mathematicians are currently working on famous problems without telling anybody. Is this a good aspect of the culture of mathematics? Maybe if all the mathematicians working secretly on the Riemann hypothesis got together and compared notes, they could solve it.
10
50
334
@PeterShor1
Peter Shor
5 years
With the Google quantum supremacy paper, the claims that quantum computers can’t possibly work keep on coming. It is becoming clear that reasoned arguments will not stop them. I don’t think illogical poetry is going to work, either. But it’s fun to write.
13
61
318
@PeterShor1
Peter Shor
2 years
I find superdetermism just as "spooky" as Einstein's action at a distance ... it implies that decisions you think are being made at a given moment (say you set detector angles by rolling dice) actually were predetermined. If this isn't "spooky", I don't know what is.
@skdh
Sabine Hossenfelder
2 years
Okay, to finish, another word on superdeterminism. If you want a local explanation of the observations of Aspect, Clauser, and Zeilinger -- ie, one without "spooky action" -- then the only currently known way to do this is superdeterminism. 13/
22
3
214
39
23
314
@PeterShor1
Peter Shor
1 year
With respect to the recent Supreme Court decision, if it's legal to give preferential admissions to people whose grandfather went to Harvard, shouldn't it also be legal to give preference to people whose great-great-great-great-great-grandparents were enslaved?
19
11
302
@PeterShor1
Peter Shor
3 years
Great advice! If you think about a mathematical problem on your own first, you may come up with new ideas. Next, look at the literature to find the old ideas people have already tried. If you're lucky, you will see how to combine your new ideas with their old ideas to solve it.
@JDHamkins
Joel David Hamkins
3 years
How to use the research literature. When approaching a difficult mathematical problem, first think deeply upon it on your own, using all the ideas you can muster, before consulting the work of others. Push your own ideas as hard as you can first, and read only afterward.
10
102
645
7
57
287
@PeterShor1
Peter Shor
3 years
A 256-qubit "analog" quantum computer.
6
60
270
@PeterShor1
Peter Shor
4 years
In celebration of Jian-Wei Pan's amazing quantum advantage experiment (which was in yesterday's print edition of 𝘚𝘤𝘪𝘦𝘯𝘤𝘦,) here is another poem for quantum computing skeptics.
4
60
258
@PeterShor1
Peter Shor
2 years
I guess it had to happen sooner or later. Wordle 319 1/6 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
11
8
245
@PeterShor1
Peter Shor
3 years
Just figured out why I hadn't proved that mathematics was inconsistent. I was really worried for a little while.
10
9
228
@PeterShor1
Peter Shor
3 years
April is poetry month. So here is some #quantumpoetry I wrote. I am the spooky action at a distance, The seething chaos that fills up empty space, The wave function collapse that you shall never witness, The living grin upon the dead cat’s face.
3
61
212
@PeterShor1
Peter Shor
5 years
Black hole evaporation is not unitary; black holes destroy quantum information.
@quantum_graeme
Graeme Smith
5 years
Please quote tweet this with your most controversial quantum information opinion.
21
4
57
13
48
212
@PeterShor1
Peter Shor
5 years
Charles Bennett is going to be the next Shannon Lecturer at the 2020 International Symposium on Information Theory (ISIT) in L.A. This is maybe the most prestigious award in information theory. Congratulations to Charlie!
Tweet media one
2
62
204
@PeterShor1
Peter Shor
3 years
Google's Quantum Summer symposium is going on right now. Hartmut Neven's keynote address: a million physical qubits with error correction by 2029 — that is extremely optimistic.
2
38
179
@PeterShor1
Peter Shor
3 years
Is calling something the Chinese remainder theorem rather than Sun-Tzu's theorem being implicitly racist? And how about reverse Polish notation, the Hungarian method, the four Russians algorithm? Are these names some kind of cultural deprecation?
22
9
168
@PeterShor1
Peter Shor
10 months
@chaoyanglu @jenseisert @NobelPrize Four of us won the Breakthrough Prize: Deutch, Bennett, Brassard, and me. Three of us won the BBVA award and a different three won the Dirac Medal. So the pessimist's prediction is that the Nobel Committee will wait for one of us to die, and award the Prize to the survivors.
3
25
167
@PeterShor1
Peter Shor
5 years
This Is No Clockwork Universe If the eternal dance of molecules Is too entangled for us mortal fools To follow, on what grounds should we complain? Who promised us that Nature’s arcane rules Would make sense to a merely human brain?
16
56
163
@PeterShor1
Peter Shor
2 years
♫♫ There's a rich man who's sure that all speech should be free And he's buying the network of Twitter, When he gets it he knows QAnoners will use It to spread their insane propaganda. Ooh, ooh, ooh, ooh, and he's buying the network of Twitter.
6
16
163
@PeterShor1
Peter Shor
4 years
A retrospective of the most interesting papers (according to the editors) of the last 15 years in Nature Physics. It's worth reading.
@NaturePhysics
Nature Physics
4 years
Feature | Over the last 15 years, the content of Nature Physics has covered an enormous breadth of subjects at the forefront of physics. The journal’s past and present editors recount their favourite papers
Tweet media one
2
28
84
0
41
160
@PeterShor1
Peter Shor
3 years
I cannot resist tweeting this SMBC comic, since it involves both physics and computational complexity:
6
34
152
@PeterShor1
Peter Shor
3 years
When our dil fridges all have overheated, And 𝘚𝘺𝘤𝘢𝘮𝘰𝘳𝘦 and 𝘉𝘳𝘪𝘴𝘵𝘭𝘦𝘤𝘰𝘯𝘦 are long forgot, Surely these lines, by endless tongues repeated, Will be remembered still — well, maybe not.
@quantum_graeme
Graeme Smith
3 years
In 200 years, they won't remember who built the first useful quantum computer, what error correcting code it used, or what algorithm it ran. They will remember @preskill and @PeterShor1 as twin bards of the early quantum age.
4
2
101
0
16
154
@PeterShor1
Peter Shor
9 months
A word about the blockade of the Gaza Strip. In World War II, the Allies blockaded Germany. Very little food got through. Ordinary Germans suffered badly from malnutrition. Belgium and Holland were even worse off. But the German army and Nazi party officials got plenty to eat.
8
18
148
@PeterShor1
Peter Shor
4 years
Once again quantum mechanics does something completely unexpected.
@ScienceNews
Science News
4 years
Chemistry students are taught that hydrogen bonds and covalent bonds are distinct, but a new study suggests they may exist on a continuum.
13
122
526
4
21
146
@PeterShor1
Peter Shor
8 months
@boundstate @VictorGalitski @quantum_graeme Bell Labs worked because they hired the best people around. If they continued to do top-flight research, they were given free reign. If they didn't they were directed to work on problems that were more relevant to the company. So the D part of R&D had some amazing people.
3
21
141
@PeterShor1
Peter Shor
4 years
For R^6, Oskar Perron proved in 1940 that it was impossible using a detailed case analysis, in a 45-page paper that is quite readable (if you know German). For R^7, the computer spit out a 200-gigabyte proof of impossibility. This shows the dangers of exponential growth.
@gregeganSF
Greg Egan
4 years
In 1992, @PeterShor1 proved that [unlike R^2 tiled with squares, R^3 tiled with cubes … R^6 tiled with 6-cubes], R^{10} tiled with 10-cubes need not have any tiles sharing (n–1)-cubes. In 2002, Mackey proved the same for R^8. Now n=7 has been settled!
2
9
91
1
20
142
@PeterShor1
Peter Shor
2 years
@protoniom Do what your heart tells you to do, and don't take career advice from responses on Twitter.
3
7
139
@PeterShor1
Peter Shor
4 years
@SamanthaStrudel I'm not sure it gets better. I got my PhD 35 years ago, and I still can't understand certain words/books/articles/theories/concepts.
2
3
127
@PeterShor1
Peter Shor
4 years
I am now a published poet:
4
11
125
@PeterShor1
Peter Shor
5 years
A Poem for Quantum Computing Skeptics Quantum computers may at first sight seem To be impossible. How dare we dream Of solving problems that else would take more time Than has passed since the cosmos’s Big Bang!
2
33
118
@PeterShor1
Peter Shor
5 years
A poem responding to Sean Carroll's recent New York Times editorial: He asks “But what is the wave function? Is it a complete and comprehensive representation of the world? ... Or does the wave function have no direct connection with reality at all?”
6
49
117
@PeterShor1
Peter Shor
4 years
In 1605, on November 5, Guy Fawkes tried to blow up the Houses of Parliament. Luckily, he was discovered. It seems like the U.S. just foiled its own version of the Gunpowder Plot. So can we establish a holiday where every year, on January 6, we burn effigies of Trump?
6
10
119
@PeterShor1
Peter Shor
2 years
@BeggyScammy @PardonMyPain @shishtaouk3 @big_cheddars @ohJuliatweets In STEM, there may only be one right answer, but often there are many, many different ways of getting to it.
2
0
112
@PeterShor1
Peter Shor
2 years
@nattyover You might use a quantum computer to simulate the fusion reactions in the interior of the sun. It won't produce any energy. You might also use a quantum computer to simulate a superconducting material. Good luck using it to replace our electric grid.
5
6
112
@PeterShor1
Peter Shor
5 years
But is there any reason to believe The universe computes the way we do? Nature is profligate with galaxies. Why shouldn’t her extravagance hold true For other things? Why mightn’t she achieve Prodigious feats of computation, too?
3
21
108
@PeterShor1
Peter Shor
2 years
A portrayal of Dan Spielman in @QuantaMagazine , who solves very hard problems by failing to solve many more very hard problems: "I do get frustrated, but it doesn’t really stop me." The Computer Scientist Who Parlays Failures Into Breakthroughs
0
25
104
@PeterShor1
Peter Shor
3 years
Philosophically, I'm not sure that there's actually a difference between an environmental unitary and an environmental projective measurement. If you believe the universe is unitary, every interaction is unitary if you take a large enough chunk of Hilbert space.
@CraigGidney
Craig Gidney
3 years
claims QEC is impossible because QEC can't correct unwanted projective measurements. Any sim of a QEC code immediately confirms that they do correct such errors. Here's that, done with the very first QEC code (Shor's 9 qubit code):
Tweet media one
2
6
50
3
4
104
@PeterShor1
Peter Shor
10 months
I really don't like Netanyahu, but I'm hoping he doesn't repeat Olmert's mistakes. Olmert made two really big mistakes: 1. He waited a long time before sending the army after Hamas. 2. He attacked all of Lebanon, and not just Hamas.
6
10
96
@PeterShor1
Peter Shor
5 years
Of course, today the reluctance scientists have to reveal their code may not be because they don't want other people to use it, but because they don't want others to see it — they're ashamed of how poorly written it is.
@michael_nielsen
Michael Nielsen
5 years
The people enabling open scientific data, open code, etc, today are in much the same spot as Oldenburg. It's challenging, a bit fraught, & requires much ingenuity. And will be looked on very kindly by history!
3
6
22
5
9
94
@PeterShor1
Peter Shor
3 years
Einstein speculated that animal senses might reveal new physics, something that may have recently happened, with the discovery that quantum effects are involved in birds' sensing of magnetic north. via @scroll_in
3
25
93
@PeterShor1
Peter Shor
2 months
Consider a binary vector space of size 2^n. Pick at random two subsets of nonzero vectors, each of size 2^(n/2)-1. What is the probability that they are disjoint? Now pick two subspaces of dimension n/2 and discard the zero vector. What is the probability that they are disjoint?
4
13
96
@PeterShor1
Peter Shor
1 year
@martinmbauer Proving scientifically that something works has no effect on whether it works or not. Lots of folk medicines have never been tested scientifically to see whether they work. So modern scientists are much too quick to dismiss folk medicine that hasn't been scientifically proven.
10
2
94
@PeterShor1
Peter Shor
5 years
It's amazing how a conjecture in operator algebras and a conjecture in quantum non-locality end up being nearly the same thing.
@enclanglement
Māris Ozols
5 years
Thomas Vidick in Notices of the @AmerMathSoc on different guises of Connes' embedding conjecture in operator algebras, quantum complexity theory, and non-locality.
0
17
73
1
17
94
@PeterShor1
Peter Shor
5 years
@dajmeyer Actually, I started by trying to find a problem that quantum computers would solve quickly. Then I saw Dan Simon's paper where he uses the quantum Fourier transform over binary strings. That was the key insight, but it took a lot more work to discover the factoring algorithm.
2
17
93
@PeterShor1
Peter Shor
2 years
John Preskill was really prescient when he tweeted this last week.
@preskill
John Preskill
2 years
John Clauser ( @Caltech BS '64) recalls his pioneering theoretical and experimental investigations of quantum entanglement.
1
36
203
5
3
87
@PeterShor1
Peter Shor
2 years
Interesting interview with John Preskill (who always has interesting things to say).
@ZierlerDavid
David Zierler
2 years
John Preskill of @Caltech physics and @IQIM_Caltech remembers Wightman and Wheeler @PrincetonPhys , Weinberg and Coleman @harvardphysics , magnetic monopoles, the meaning of black hole information, Shor's Algorithm, and the origins of quantum computing
Tweet media one
2
78
352
3
7
84
@PeterShor1
Peter Shor
2 years
Not surprising, but not a very good sign for the future.
3
10
78
@PeterShor1
Peter Shor
2 years
Because today is National Bagel Day in the U.S., here is a poem: A Bagel Fable. (And the machine really exists!)
Tweet media one
2
8
78
@PeterShor1
Peter Shor
4 years
@MarioKrenn6240 I hope you realize this can't go on forever. If each researcher in the field doesn't start publishing exponential numbers of papers, I think tweaks to existing infrastructure should be able to handle it. (But if the AI computers themselves start writing papers, we're in trouble.)
6
5
73
@PeterShor1
Peter Shor
9 months
And while the Allies probably couldn’t let food through the blockade without letting weapons through, the IDF can. In the long run, Netanyahu’s policies are likely to destroy Israel. He should be deposed immediately.
3
3
73
@PeterShor1
Peter Shor
4 years
Matt Gaetz: your reasoning is seriously flawed. "If somebody can get struck by a car and killed crossing a suburban street, there's no reason that I shouldn't stroll across a six-lane superhighway." See how 𝘴𝘵𝘶𝘱𝘪𝘥 that sounds.
@TeddyAmen
Teddy Amenabar
4 years
Rep. Matt Gaetz on Fox News Friday night: “If this virus can get into the Oval, into the body of the president, there’s no place where it could not possibly infect one of our fellow Americans.”
2
2
2
0
6
70
@PeterShor1
Peter Shor
4 years
@cwalterswrite The first paper I wrote went through on the first pass. It was written so badly that nobody understood it, and it had a mistake Pooya Hatami discovered 25 years later. Fixing the mistake was easy, but we needed to rewrite it completely to get it past the referees the second time.
0
3
69
@PeterShor1
Peter Shor
2 years
Wordle 228 4/6 ⬛⬛🟩⬛⬛ ⬛⬛⬛🟨🟨 ⬛🟩⬛🟩🟩 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩 Do we know the distribution of Wordle words? Suppose you've narrowed it down to two possible words and you have to guess. Is the most common one more likely, or do they have the same chance of being right?
10
5
67
@PeterShor1
Peter Shor
4 years
@wrichars The Supreme Court is never going to agree that a wealth tax is constitutional. What you have to do is raise the capital gains tax. It's ridiculously low now, and the only rationale for its being so low is that the rich people don't have to pay taxes.
7
1
68
@PeterShor1
Peter Shor
2 years
I'd interpret the citation “foundational work in the field of quantum information” as saying they're honoring us for helping to found the field of quantum information. (Of course, we had a lot of help, from Feynman and others).
2
3
66
@PeterShor1
Peter Shor
4 years
In Italy, the largest population clogging the emergency rooms and overloading the medical system (requiring extreme medical intervention) seems to be elderly people. Here's a proposal for how to avoid it: free Meals on Wheels for all seniors living at home who want them.
3
4
63
@PeterShor1
Peter Shor
3 years
"Analog computer" used in its original sense ... you set up the computer so it behaves analogously to the system you want to investigate.
4
1
63
@PeterShor1
Peter Shor
3 years
More evidence that we have no clue how the brain works.
1
19
64
@PeterShor1
Peter Shor
5 years
The best, and funniest, summary of the Google-IBM controversy I've seen yet (even if he is biased because of his employer).
1
15
65
@PeterShor1
Peter Shor
4 years
You can call "teleporting quantum information" by the name "sending quantum information through a traversable wormhole". As far as I can tell, all this does is confuse the public. I don't see how a teleportation experiments can demonstrate anything about wormholes or black holes.
@quantum_geoff
Geoff Penington
4 years
There's been some controversy over this generally excellent article by @philipcball , so I thought I would write some thoughts. Full disclosure: I'm friends with many of the authors of this paper and was acknowledged in it for a couple of tangentially related discussions 1/n
1
24
80
2
4
63
@PeterShor1
Peter Shor
2 years
@SeamusBlackley We need a name for this. Youthsplaining?
7
0
61
@PeterShor1
Peter Shor
2 years
@KikeSolanoPhys @Microsoft Have you ever heard of Moore's law? Do you have some reason to think it won't apply to quantum computers? People currently making projections of useful quantum computers in five to ten years are hopelessly optimistic. Projections of centuries are hopelessly pessimistic.
3
6
64
@PeterShor1
Peter Shor
9 months
The same thing is going on in Gaza today. Hamas and its army have enough to eat—there are undoubtedly large quantities of food stored in Hamas’s tunnels. The only thing the food blockade is doing is teaching Palestinians to hate Israel.
4
1
61
@PeterShor1
Peter Shor
4 months
I think it's time for Benny Gantz to quit the government of Israel and try to bring Netanyahu down. Does he really want to be complicit in the impending crime against humanity?
@UN_News_Centre
UN News
4 months
"Despite the tragedy unfolding under our watch, the Israeli authorities informed the UN that they will no longer approve any UNRWA food convoys to the north" of Gaza - @UNRWA More here ⤵️
Tweet media one
32
140
148
5
8
62
@PeterShor1
Peter Shor
3 years
@wtgowers People are calling for real-world examples of social considerations having an impact on mathematics. I have a couple from quantum information theory.
2
10
62
@PeterShor1
Peter Shor
3 years
If Omicron is the most contagious virus ever seen, one wonders why there aren’t others. One possibility: they run through all their fuel, burn themselves out, and go extinct. And if Omicron does that, it will take all the other variants with it, and the pandemic will be over...
11
5
59
@PeterShor1
Peter Shor
4 years
I really don't want to say that ICE is as bad as the Nazis were, but this is absolutely the wrong excuse. Most Nazis were only enforcing the laws, as well.
@Newsweek
Newsweek
4 years
ICE agents complain about Nazi comparisons, say they're only enforcing the laws
5K
4K
13K
0
4
61
@PeterShor1
Peter Shor
4 years
@ThomasBurkhartB @wrichars @TheRealAdamKemp If a college professor (like I am) makes $400,000 a year, they're taxed at a marginal rate of 35%. But Mr. John Dale Robberbaron VII makes $20 million a year in capital gains, and his income is taxed at 15%, a lot less than I actually pay. This is what Krugman is talking about.
2
1
57
@PeterShor1
Peter Shor
4 years
Variation on a Theme of von Neumann (Theme: Anyone who considers arithmetical methods of producing random digits is, of course, in a state of sin.) Is it not blasphemous of us to hope That all of Nature, in her boundless scope, Can be reduced to voltage on a chip?
1
8
58
@PeterShor1
Peter Shor
9 months
If the Israeli Defense Forces don't have a strategy for a war with Hamas, which it currently appears they do not (of course, I can't say for sure), this is a failure of colossal proportions. They should have been preparing for this for the last fifteen years.
12
6
55
@PeterShor1
Peter Shor
2 years
@skdh @dahankzter The standard model does not work fine ... it does not explain galaxy rotation curves. For that we either need MOND, for which there is no experimental evidence (as opposed to observational evidence) whatsoever, or dark matter (ditto).
8
1
57
@PeterShor1
Peter Shor
9 months
@AGHamilton29 Most of the people Israrl has killed are NOT Hamas terrorists, but innocent Palestinian civilians. It seems to me that you are the one being naive.
5
5
56
@PeterShor1
Peter Shor
2 years
@ulysses313131 @skdh I don't have a solution. I do have a question: why does everybody keep trying to come up with a classical mental picture of the universe when it's quantum?
9
5
53
@PeterShor1
Peter Shor
4 years
Experiments are catching up with quantum mechanical "paradoxes", not just in the area of quantum information but also in quantum tunneling, which happens faster than light by some measures.
@nattyover
Natalie Wolchover
4 years
I wrote about recent virtuoso experiments that have measured how long particles take to tunnel through walls. Physicists have obsessed over this question for nearly a century, because it raises a bigger question: What is time, even?
27
69
264
4
19
54
@PeterShor1
Peter Shor
5 years
Is that a Schrödinger cat?
@das_seed
Siddhartha| सिद्धार्थ| సిద్ధార్థ
5 years
Google's cat is out of the box: .
0
5
36
7
9
53
@PeterShor1
Peter Shor
10 months
@WKCosmo What do you mean by "simultaneously"?
1
2
53
@PeterShor1
Peter Shor
2 years
@Liv_Lanes I think that this is one of the hazards (maybe the only one) of tweeting about quantum mechanics. I don't know what to do about it, either.
4
3
50
@PeterShor1
Peter Shor
4 years
@skdh If you're saying to give up on any problem people have spent 40 years on and haven't solved, that's crazy. If you're saying physicists won't recognize a solution to the black hole information problem, that's true for some physicists, but I have more faith in the whole community.
11
4
53
@PeterShor1
Peter Shor
4 years
@skdh You're making the same mistake that John Horgan @Horganism made in his book "The End of Science". There are fields where nobody has any real clue which direction to go in, and we extrapolate and say that nobody will ever find the solution. But solutions can come out of the blue.
2
0
49
@PeterShor1
Peter Shor
4 years
If God’s great handiwork does not have more computing power Than do our jury-rigged contraptions, how are We to believe that it could be His finest workmanship?
3
5
50
@PeterShor1
Peter Shor
4 years
@jen_keesmaat @A_Aspuru_Guzik The coronavirus is transmitted by people who are showing no symptoms. If everybody wears a mask, we cut down on asymptotic transmission and flatten the curve (by people who happen to be sick but have no symptoms yet). It won't work if everybody who's not symptomatic stays home.
2
4
49
@PeterShor1
Peter Shor
2 years
@BarakShoshany Well, except for the math being advanced, you're both right.
1
2
50
@PeterShor1
Peter Shor
3 years
@newplatonism I has a proof that no quantum algorithm [satisfying some conditions] could accomplish a certain task. And then I found an algorithm that accomplished it. The resolution was that the conditions weren't satisfied. But it took me ridiculously long to figure this out.
4
3
50
@PeterShor1
Peter Shor
2 years
@skdh I find superdetermism just as "spooky" as Einstein's action at a distance ... it implies that decisions you think are being made at a given moment (say you set detector angles by rolling a die) actually were predetermined. If this isn't "spooky", I don't know what you think is.
9
3
49
@PeterShor1
Peter Shor
4 years
Mr. Trump, tear down this wall!
@washingtonpost
The Washington Post
4 years
White House almost completely surrounded by more than a mile of fencing
1K
1K
3K
1
3
44
@PeterShor1
Peter Shor
3 years
I make superconductors lose all their resistance, I make the atom split, the laser gleam, And although you might feel bewildered by my strangeness, I am real; 𝘺𝘰𝘶 are living in a dream.
1
8
46
@PeterShor1
Peter Shor
2 years
@SJ_Powers Funding decisions are made by panels of very smart researchers, but the dynamics of these panels tend to work against radical new untested ideas. Luckily, I didn't need a grant to work on quantum factoring (I was at Bell Labs), but I probably wouldn't have gotten one.
3
1
45
@PeterShor1
Peter Shor
2 years
For me, the obvious answer to this is “yes”. Do people always use an inner monologue thinking about math? (I sometimes do, sometimes don’t.) Apparently, some people never think in inner monologues, which surprises me. But this shows the risk of generalizing from one example.
@LiveScience
Live Science
2 years
Can we think without using language?
3
16
26
8
4
43
@PeterShor1
Peter Shor
2 years
@BarakShoshany Or say 'I am very interested in your area of research,' without actually specifying what it is.
1
0
42
@PeterShor1
Peter Shor
5 years
This is a double-crostic, a type of puzzle generally only seen in the Sunday NYT. Its solution also contains the wonderful quote from her book "Kepler in later life became convinced the planets play music ... [he] concluded the earth sings mi fa mi. It wasn't his best work."
@skdh
Sabine Hossenfelder
5 years
It took me a while to understand this image, but apparently the solution to Sunday's NYT crossword was "HOSSENFELDER LOST IN MATH". Probably the first and last time I'm the solution to anything 🙃
Tweet media one
22
27
411
1
5
42
@PeterShor1
Peter Shor
3 years
A really interesting discussion of the recent controversies over the detection of Majorana fermions in 𝘕𝘢𝘵𝘶𝘳𝘦.
@spinespresso
Sergey Frolov🇺🇦
3 years
I am happy how it turned out and I hope you read it
8
64
286
0
6
41
@PeterShor1
Peter Shor
4 years
This is St. Patrick's Day, so I'm posting a couple of limericks; hopefully, they will make a few people smile in these grim times. There once was a rhyme-loving nerd Whose limericks all were absurd, For his rule was he must In the last line put just One
2
1
39
@PeterShor1
Peter Shor
2 years
Beautiful article by Claire Voisin on doing mathematical research. "One may argue that a great theorem cannot actually depend on obscure and technical details, but this is only true a posteriori, once we are convinced that the result is true."
@monsoon0
Nalini Joshi
2 years
“I find it hard to do mathematical research full time. Hard because new ideas are so rare that we are faced most of the time with our own mediocrity…Yet…” Refreshingly honest, clear-eyed view by one of the greats of mathematics … #mathematicallife
2
9
46
0
8
40
@PeterShor1
Peter Shor
5 years
I find it difficult to believe that our ancestors have been eating burnt meat for over a million years without evolving ways to digest it without getting cancer. On the other hand, we've only been eating nitrite-drenched burnt meat for a century. So maybe avoid preserved meats.
@nytimes
The New York Times
5 years
Researchers are in another fight about whether or not meat is bad for you
68
94
253
6
3
40