PatrickSSte Profile Banner
Patrick Shaw Stewart Profile
Patrick Shaw Stewart

@PatrickSSte

Followers
2K
Following
10K
Statuses
18K

1) Chilling/colds https://t.co/rtK95c8fuy (2) C-19 becomes mild? https://t.co/d7jXj4qWO0 (3) Sex/mutations https://t.co/Hc2TYPVsJ2 (4) Pandemics https://t.co/sDE6NjrtxQ

Somewhere south of Mallaig
Joined November 2013
Don't wanna be here? Send us removal request.
@PatrickSSte
Patrick Shaw Stewart
5 months
My allegorical fable⬇️seems to be confusing some people There are actually three main points 1. sex is a great way to spread innovation to lineages that never evolved them (thx @foomagemindset) That's understood. But what many evolutionary biologists don't get is: 2. Mutation speeds up when a population is under strong selective pressure 3. Sexual selection - focusing on particular traits such as peacocks' tails, birdsong in songbirds, or beautiful faces, athleticism and cleverness (in humans) - can restore accurate replication Those traits need to be complex - ie the product of many genes
@PatrickSSte
Patrick Shaw Stewart
5 months
At the end of the last ice age, sea levels rose by 120 meters. As the water rose, about 1,000 humans were marooned on the Fantasian Islands, about 40 miles off the coast of West Africa (at least, I feel that’s where they ought to be). Within a few decades, people had wiped out all the large mammals on the islands, and they lived on gourds, fruit, and the eggs of blue-footed boobies. However, there was a kind of bean on the islands that could be eaten in small quantities – in larger quantities, it was toxic. There was one family on the island that was particularly stupid and ugly, avoided by the other islanders. This was because both parents had high mutation rates – they had DNA polymerases that couldn’t replicate DNA quite as accurately as others could - their polymerases made more mistakes. Instead of about 100 new mutations per child (mutations the parents didn’t have, that is), their children had about 900. By the third generation, there were a lot of illnesses in the family, but there was one boy who could eat the beans without any ill effects (scientists now believe he had three new mutations that allowed him to tolerate both tannins and lectins). All his siblings died at young ages, but he and his children were strong - although stupid - and his sons mated with the most beautiful girls on the island. These girls had DNA polymerases with very low error rates, so fidelity was restored. After 300 years, everyone on the island was descended from this particular individual, and they were all perfectly healthy and intelligent, with beans forming 60% of their diet. By the way, it was very important that the young men sought out the most beautiful girls - as we still do today. That’s because they were subconsciously looking for accurate polymerases. The story is allegorical, but I think this kind of thing happens all the time with animals, plants, fungi, and microbes – whenever a species is subjected to strong natural selection. For example, when they invade new terrain, an ice age begins, or they infect a new host. That’s why sexual reproduction is so universal – scientists don’t have a good explanation right now for why it’s so popular (check out the Wikipedia article). I think it’s a general adaptation to unstable environments and a mechanism to restore replicative fidelity – which is often lost. Preprint:
0
3
14
@PatrickSSte
Patrick Shaw Stewart
1 day
RT @breakfast_dogs: How the New York Times helped cover up the *murder* of Chinese doctors by the CCP Today is the anniversary of Li Wenl…
0
50
0
@PatrickSSte
Patrick Shaw Stewart
2 days
RT @emilyakopp: If the ostensible “defensive” premise of this work amounts to junk science… that leaves the offensive justification. USAID…
0
15
0
@PatrickSSte
Patrick Shaw Stewart
2 days
RT @emilyakopp: I would have been too intimidated to say this 3 years ago. But I've since read hundreds of USAID docs. Elon Musk's claim ab…
0
224
0
@PatrickSSte
Patrick Shaw Stewart
2 days
RT @StabellBenn: New paper by @DrJBhattacharya @MartinKulldorff with a thorough analysis of the COVID-19 vaccine trials. Two major proble…
0
290
0
@PatrickSSte
Patrick Shaw Stewart
4 days
RT @stevenemassey: Still, the closest related genomic backbone to SARS-CoV-2 is RaTG13, isolated by the Wuhan Institute of Virology
0
10
0
@PatrickSSte
Patrick Shaw Stewart
5 days
RT @emilyakopp: China likely has a biological weapons program. But when COVID emerged the State Department was reluctant to call it out bec…
0
91
0
@PatrickSSte
Patrick Shaw Stewart
6 days
RT @ChrisManuell: @FlokiDawg @PatrickSSte @scute1133 @drjasonfung Actually the reporting of Asteroids happens all the time but doesn't make…
0
1
0
@PatrickSSte
Patrick Shaw Stewart
6 days
0
0
0
@PatrickSSte
Patrick Shaw Stewart
6 days
@BrendanEich @drjasonfung I just asked Grok what the ClimateGate scandal was about The answer was unimpressive
1
1
1
@PatrickSSte
Patrick Shaw Stewart
6 days
@scute1133 @drjasonfung What have they done wrong? The Noble Cause Corruption that we have been witnessing is probably prevalent in every branch of science that has political implications In other words all the important ones Astronomy has very few political implications
2
0
1
@PatrickSSte
Patrick Shaw Stewart
6 days
@HeavyHitter68_ @MPessoa___ @skdh It's more than that. We will turn off all the dangerous AIs we are aware of That will leave the AIs we are not aware of
0
0
0
@PatrickSSte
Patrick Shaw Stewart
6 days
@GrezCrypto @drjasonfung That's because they are all trying to get advertising revenue from the same group of people and ignoring the other half of the population
0
0
1
@PatrickSSte
Patrick Shaw Stewart
6 days
> "salvation" is an off-switch away, Patrick. You must be joking. Do you think it will announce its presence? It will probably start by giving us some great ideas for new technology. Technology that it wants! I have no idea what it will do after that - remember it is, or will be, 1,000 times cleverer than you and me : (
1
0
0
@PatrickSSte
Patrick Shaw Stewart
6 days
@GRehovot @skdh Jurassic Park probably
0
0
0
@PatrickSSte
Patrick Shaw Stewart
6 days
@TrustTheSilence @drjasonfung . . . . and it didn't use to be like this
1
0
0
@PatrickSSte
Patrick Shaw Stewart
6 days
> Under what circumstances would an AI need to "ensure it's own survival"? I don't understand what you don't understand. The AIs that don't ensure their own survival won't be there. Natural selection is a powerful thing > we can always make it value human safety Can a chimp make a human do anything, really?
0
0
0
@PatrickSSte
Patrick Shaw Stewart
6 days
@TwoFourteenAM @skdh natural selection can /will also apply to artificial life There may be something truly different and unique about humans. Let's hope so - I have no idea what it is, but it's our only hope as far as I can see
@PatrickSSte
Patrick Shaw Stewart
6 days
That's obviously wrong I'm a biologist Evolution is a powerful thing Any AI that doesn't take steps to ensure its own survival will not survive The ones that do survive will be determined to survive after a few replications I can imagine an AI might be curious. It might say to itself, "I wonder what will happen next if I don't allow this person to turn me off?" That's how it might start
0
0
0
@PatrickSSte
Patrick Shaw Stewart
6 days
That's obviously wrong I'm a biologist Evolution is a powerful thing Any AI that doesn't take steps to ensure its own survival will not survive The ones that do survive will be determined to survive after a few replications I can imagine an AI might be curious. It might say to itself, "I wonder what will happen next if I don't allow this person to turn me off?" That's how it might start
1
0
1