![M๐ Profile](https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/568330349222977536/6W0vRZz2_x96.jpeg)
M๐
@Pakeha56
Followers
287
Following
25K
Statuses
101K
I live in a colonised country, with an indigenous Polynesian population. ''Pฤkehฤโ (paa keh haa) is the Mฤori name for New Zealanders of European descent.
Aotearoa
Joined August 2014
Bombshell revelations in the newly released interview with Gallant. In April 2024, during Passover, Israel's War Cabinet unanimously agreed on a hostage deal framework with a target of releasing 33 hostages, with a minimum acceptable number of 18 hostages. This was meant to be highly confidential negotiating information. Within hours of this sensitive decision, Finance Minister Smotrich (who wasn't even part of the War Cabinet) somehow obtained this classified information about the minimum number (18 hostages). He then announced it in a general cabinet meeting, effectively making it public knowledge. According to Defense Minister Gallant's account, this leak directly damaged the negotiations. Once Hamas learned through Israeli media that Israel would accept as few as 18 hostages, they immediately lowered their offer from 33, ultimately leading to the deal's collapse. Leadership Failure: Instead of investigating this serious security breach, Netanyahu's reported response was to try to "change the mandate" for the negotiating team. This only changed when Gallant insisted on involving Benny Gantz and demanded a new War Cabinet vote. Long-term Consequences: According to Gallant, this sabotage had lasting effects. When a similar deal was finally possible in July, it came with much worse terms - requiring Israel to release 110 additional prisoners serving life sentences that weren't part of the original negotiations. The most outrageous aspect is that this appears to have been an intentional sabotage of the hostage negotiations. The security establishment and Washington believed that Netanyahu's own people may have leaked the information to Smotrich to deliberately torpedo the deal. This means that political considerations potentially took precedence over the lives of Israeli hostages. This revelation is particularly disturbing because it suggests that an opportunity to free hostages was lost months before October 7th, and the terms Israel eventually had to consider became significantly worse over time. The deliberate leak of classified negotiation parameters is not just a breach of security protocols - it's a direct betrayal of the hostages and their families. Netanyahu was more concerned with changing the negotiation mandate than investigating who leaked this crucial information. This raises serious questions about his priorities and leadership during this crisis. it also raises questions about whether he gave Smotrich the info. As we know, Netanyahu sabotaged a deal again in July and leaked information to cover it up to the foreign press. The truth is, if the hostages had been a priority to Netanyahu, they would have been home a long time ago.
0
0
0
@BirdSculptures @AviMayer The following interval shifted the whole world against Israel.
@AviMayer Zionists really are an unbelievable piece of work. Use food as a weapon then complain when hostages are thin.
0
0
0
In the first weeks of the first ceasefire Hamas called on the corrupt government of Israel to maintain a ceasefire to release some of the hostages that were sick (as the hospitals in Gaza were bombed by Israel). Israel refused, and in fact went on to bomb at least 25 of the hostages to death and to field execute at least 3 of the hostages to death. The little details you choose to not mention, are critical for your argument, Alonso.
1
0
0
@EFischberger @AviMayer What excuse does Israel have for starving its prisoners? And for beating them? And for medical neglect?
0
0
0
@Ellagl1 @MiguelMadeira11 @aziz0nomics Israel removed the Jews from Gaza because it could not afford to maintain the occupation there. As with Sinai...
1
0
0
@Ellagl1 @MiguelMadeira11 @aziz0nomics Arafat is long dead and the PA is an arm of Israeli security. Netanyahu's declaration is more recent.
0
0
0
@Ellagl1 @MiguelMadeira11 @aziz0nomics That is imperialism. What Palestinians experienced was classic European colonialism, and now it is a modern version. Israel is now the foreign power in the OPTs.
1
0
0
@Ellagl1 @MiguelMadeira11 @aziz0nomics All of your rhetoric is aimed at depicting Arabs as violent savages. So very colonial...of the European kind...
1
0
0
@Ellagl1 @MiguelMadeira11 @aziz0nomics There was an elderly Jew living in Gaza until about 20 years ago. Also one in Baghdad.
1
0
0
@Ellagl1 @MiguelMadeira11 @aziz0nomics Israel effectively terminated the Oslo Accords when it declared the occupation to be permanent. The settlements had a certain level of legitimacy until then as subject to final status negotiations, by agreement. This is no longer the case.
1
0
0
@Ellagl1 @MiguelMadeira11 @aziz0nomics While innocent Jews were victims of retaliation, it is rather more the case that Arabs were victims of British imperialism, in the service of Jewish colonisation. Most colonials do not have the privilege of blaming the colonised for initiating conflict, (though they try to).
1
0
0
@Ellagl1 @MiguelMadeira11 @aziz0nomics About 5percent wisely left prior to hostilities breaking out, although the Zionist terrorism used to drive out most was already started by then. Your attempts to paint Arabs as violent savages and Jews as innocent victims are somewhat undercut by what we have witnessed recently.
1
0
0
@Ellagl1 @MiguelMadeira11 @aziz0nomics Are you saying that Jews can be given Israeli citizenship if they do not even go to Israel?
1
0
0
@Ellagl1 @MiguelMadeira11 @aziz0nomics You might have a case if Jews are prepared to become citizens of the State of Palestine. Otherwise, it remains illegal for good reasons for Israeli settlements to be built in occupied territories, significantly more so since Israel terminated the Oslo Accords.
2
0
0
@maplebonk @LeppardJ @DanielSeidemann Hamas may be flouting such observance, but ICRC is observing "the imperative to protect them from harm during their captivity and upon their release."
0
0
0