![Othman 🌲 Profile](https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/1843459613003329536/mEpr5ix3_x96.jpg)
Othman 🌲
@OthmanOnX
Followers
3K
Following
3K
Statuses
673
Heritage American. You could go outside. Personal account, views are my own. Moderate.
Lotusland
Joined November 2023
RT @captivedreamer7: It's 2025 and Trump won, you don't have to pretend people with names like "Kendrick Lamar" are cool anymore. You don'…
0
291
0
@NateAFischer You guys aren’t ready for the story behind Tiffany’s and how that name even got to America
1
0
0
Basically we went from absolute, fused power vested in a Monarch to limited enumerated powers in a government comprised of 3 co-equal separate branches while keeping the exact same legal system through the transition and this was idiotic. We tried to fix this in the 19th century but got interrupted by the civil war and manifest destiny. There are some very niche and esoteric texts where Scalia explains the incompatibility of common law and the separation of powers. What is even a Court’s authority without a King? A Court is meant to be a case-by-case exertion of executive power. How on Earth can they be separate? Then you run into the enforcement issue. These sound like dumb questions but they’re integral to the very foundation of government. We have had a silent constitutional crisis since we declared independence. This is probably equally as problematic on the state level. The Framers were not divinely inspired. They were men. And honestly, they fucked up the Judicial Question. I hope to fix this. Lawyers without agendas will understand this.
0
0
9
Btw this Judge’s ruling and the ensuing “constitutional crisis” media blitz is an obvious coordinated comms op orchestrated by Democrats to besmirch POTUS’s legal legitimacy. This is all they have left. Pathetic. Ignore and continue working.
2
8
93
My issue with this is that it makes the President nearly omnipotent. Impeachment/removal also lacks an enforcement arm. Can the President just ignore that too? Read the post I quoted above. I think at some point you just have to hope the law is respected and no one tries to usurp power in this way, and I think the founders recognized this. After all they recognized the fragility of a republic. This was an experiment. “A republic, if you can keep it.” I’d rather amend the constitution for clarity before it breaks.
1
0
0