John Mandlbaur
@Mandlbaur
Followers
392
Following
3,212
Media
719
Statuses
76,250
The perfectly well written and undefeated proof of my historic discovery is here: Please address it maturely?
Randburg, South Africa
Joined January 2011
Don't wanna be here?
Send us removal request.
Explore trending content on Musk Viewer
Bills
• 110054 Tweets
Lamar
• 97497 Tweets
Ravens
• 96700 Tweets
Bengals
• 79081 Tweets
Phillies
• 72731 Tweets
Browns
• 63747 Tweets
Giants
• 60758 Tweets
#GHDBT5
• 53282 Tweets
Watson
• 51045 Tweets
Burrow
• 43229 Tweets
Broncos
• 40761 Tweets
49ers
• 39122 Tweets
Texans
• 36842 Tweets
Packers
• 33955 Tweets
Aces
• 29098 Tweets
Seahawks
• 27910 Tweets
Harper
• 23287 Tweets
Josh Allen
• 21779 Tweets
Nacho
• 21688 Tweets
De Gea
• 21369 Tweets
Rams
• 19938 Tweets
#StrayKids_Dominate_AMAs
• 18879 Tweets
STRAY KIDS BOYBAND LEGACY
• 18301 Tweets
Cardinals
• 15975 Tweets
Castellanos
• 15351 Tweets
ثوب الصحه
• 14676 Tweets
Zac Taylor
• 11816 Tweets
Purdy
• 10822 Tweets
Jordan Love
• 10163 Tweets
McDermott
• 10113 Tweets
Pinned Tweet
Does it physically hurt you to acknowledge that angular momentum is not conserved?
31
4
23
@xkcd
This is totally outdated. The modern scientific method is different. It has two steps:
1) Neglect any evidence that indicates that you may be wrong.
2) Personally and aggressively attack the proponent.
4
0
44
@AOC
@ccarman602
Why not tax everyone equally in proportion.
A person earns ten bucks and pays on or two to taxes. A person earns ten thousand bucks and pays two thousand bucks tax.
The rich guy pays more than the poor guy, but suffers the same proportionally.
5
0
15
@caitiedelaney
@ParkinsonHB
They explain it the same way they explain any other anomaly. If it can’t be explained by existing theory then instead of accepting that the theory is wrong, we give the anomaly a name and imagine that this automatically manifests some kind of reality. This is dark hair ties.
1
2
10
@akheriaty
@DSBIC
I hear that kind of rhetoric every day from members of the scientific community, mostly professors and PhD scientists. It indicates a mental block and denial of the facts by denigrating the proponent.
0
0
6
How is it possible that scientists can be so arrogant and ignorant?
2
0
3
I am being censored on every forum because I am right. Otherwise the scientists would simply defeat my proof instead.
2
0
4
The scientific method:
Scientists make a prediction using theory and then make an experiment to test if the theory does not match predictions.
If the predictions are not met, then make excuses, insult all contradicting experimenters.
Then hunt down and censor all dissent.
2
0
5
@oliverpiper11
This is a lie.
This is not me.
Please stop this intimidation by impersonation.
I do not even know or care what mcsr is.
This is total lies.
0
0
6
@xicad1
I would prefer to get through to you the simple and obvious truth that angular momentum is not conserved.
1
0
6
@matthematician
I regret to inform you that angular momentum is not conserved and about half of physics is literally a waste of time. I can prove this mathematically but since you are a mathematician, you will simply neglect the fact because that is the standard behavior of mathematicians.
6
2
6
@frogs4girls
Why would they bother to visit such a primitive bunch of apes who still think that angular momentum is conserved even after they have been shown clear and undeniable evidence confirming angular energy is conserved.
1
0
5
@philosophytweet
The fact that angular momentum is not conserved because a hand held ball on a string example does not accelerate like a Ferrari engine as the theory predicts, is objective fact.
Any claim that angular momentum is conserved, is subjective unsupported speculation.
0
0
0
So the restriction on my account was lifted for a bit and one persons set up an account clearly to stalk me and I made a compliant about that one person and now I am being punished for complaining and my account is again totally restricted. WTF is going on here?
3
0
3
@Physicsastronmy
Here he is inadvertently confirming that angular momentum is not conserved. See example 1:
1
1
2
@Psychology_Call
People start hating you when they cannot defeat your work but are unable to accept the conclusion.
0
2
4
@CherylSmith201
@AstroSpanner
@physicsnoob5
@EmperorZelos
@AnularMomentum
@Qwertasdfplzh
@vivissiah
@jk48800
@RealPhysProf
@Mahmoud34489685
@AngeSurTerre197
@aneuperspectiv
@elonmusk
Every ball on a string in history did not do 12000 rpm, so if you have one, it is very obviously a cherry picked fudge.
1
0
1
If physics was correct then the hand held example would burn rubber because physics predicts 12000 rpm for this example :
9
0
5
I am being subjected to the ultimate censorship.
Nobody wants to hear the truth so everyone neglects to face the fact that angular momentum is not conserved and simply mutes and stops listening.
It is like being on a planet of dumb apes.
0
1
5
You are psychotic. Every single human being is psychotic. I am the only sane person. Literally. Try that one on for size. The only people that talk to me are intentionally antagonistic and insulting because they can’t defeat the truth and the rest would prefer not to hear truth.
2
1
5
@MindHaste
Yes, like why does a ball on a string demonstration of conservation of angular momentum not conserve angular momentum and actually contradict the prediction of Ferrari engine speeds?
0
0
4
@AngeloEnergos
@RealPhysProf
@AngularEnergy
@MBecca28982
@physicsnoob5
@spicytakes69
@Mandlberg
@CherylSmith201
@AngeSurTerre197
Well you can delude yourself as much as you like, but until you can I face identify a genuine error in my proof, you cannot.
1
0
0
When you discover that angular momentum is not conserved, you also discover that there are no genuinely nice people on earth, only a pack of hounds.
3
0
2
@ProfFeynman
Even those with PhD's become scientifically illiterate if the evidence contradicts their beliefs. Like those who tell me that "maths is not proof" when more than half of physics is based entirely upon maths.
1
0
3
@CherylSmith201
@physicsnoob5
@spicytakes69
@AngeSurTerre197
@BallsOnStrings
Stop being dishonest and insulting.
I have never claimed anything about thermodynamics and you are inviting dishonest carp to put words in my mouth. aren't you?
Why are you so badly behaved?
1
0
0
If scientists are right, then why do they evade my paper and make excuses and insult me instead of doing science and measuring a ball on a string and showing me that angular momentum is conserved by it or conceding that angular energy is conserved and confirmed independently?
5
0
4
What is difficult about measuring a ball on a string experiment confirming conservation of angular energy and falsifying conservation of angular momentum?
Is it conceding that makes it so hard?
6
1
3
@EricRWeinstein
@elonmusk
@martinmbauer
Neither of you crackpots live up to the hype you speak.
The law of conservation of angular momentum is fundamentally wrong according to your own principles but you just deny all experimental evidence, and yank exactly hard enough as if that is science and not crackpottery.
0
0
0
@engineers_feed
This is incorrect. Dark matter is the name we have given to an anomaly. An anomaly is a discrepancy between the predictions of theory and the observations. A discrepancy between observations and theory is proof that the theory is wrong.
1
0
4
@lydiakarch
@girlbossmoder
Thank you.
Yes, themes psychosis is unfortunate and is hindering the progress of humanity.
1
1
2
@AshGray314
I am leaning towards the bad people idea.
They are honestly terribly behaved and concerned only about their own egos and have no interest in truth whatsoever and use slander and credential intimidation as their entire argumentative tactic.
They are dogmatic and closed minded.
0
0
3
I ma being threatened by a piece of shit who calls himself “RealPhysProf” he is literally threatening to silence my Twitter account again if I don’t accept that he is allowed to personally insult me with every post he makes.
This is disgusting behavior of moderation WTF???
12
0
2
@kevindotcar
You understand that if the ball is pulled in without angular momentum being conserved, then the law of COAM is wrong, right.
If angular momentum is conserved then it is impossible to pull in the string without inputting the energy needed. Do you understand that?
1
0
3
@13adh13
@absoluterelati1
If your hypothesis relies upon conservation of angular momentum, then your hypothesis is wrong.
0
0
3
I am being censored on twitter.
If you don't believe me and have lots of followers, share my tweet and see how my views are being limited.
3
1
3
In science we should resolve disputes by measuring. Why are the professors of physics only capable of excuses?
1
0
3
The only way that it is possible for no work to be done during circular motion is if the radius is infinite.
1
0
3
@PhysInHistory
@ProfFeynman
Feynman also believed that if the predictions of theory do not match reality then the theory is wrong. Which all academics have a big issue with.
0
0
3
@sl1dr
Sure you have, you love being faced with the fact that angular momentum is not conserved.
0
0
2
@DontSt4lkMe
Yes, I just made up the fact that the law of conservation of angular momentum predicts 12000 rpm for a typical ball on a string demonstration. Just made it up and it just so happens that it is exactly what the law predicts. I manifested that into reality just by making it up.
1
1
3
@skdh
Exactly. It is literally the name we have given to the anomaly which is empirical proof that the theory is wrong.
1
0
3
@ProfFeynman
Yea, like learning from your mistake in believing that angular momentum is conserved because an ice skater “spins faster” and measuring it instead and accepting that it is in fact angular energy that is conserved.
1
0
1
@zaaatch
Easy. All you have to do is tell people the truth that angular momentum is not conserved.
1
0
1
It is literally fucking crazy. All I do is calculate the existing physics prediction and point out the obvious inexcusable conclusion and people start hating me. Badly. Like set up groups to track me and follow me around and slander me in attempt to censor me. It is unreasonable.
2
1
2
It is absolutely clear that my account is restricted to only being viewed by a few selected individuals who have been entitled to implement automated responses. This is literally terrorism. HOW DARE YOU BEHAVE LIKE THIS.
0
0
2
If you can behave like an adult and address my proof rationally, then please do so, but I have had enough of literal physicists being childish and stupid.
If you cannot grow up then fuck off.
3
0
2
Yes, gangstalkers,listen up.
Great advice from Dennett for engaging philosophically with those you disagree with.
30
146
729
2
1
2
@PhysInHistory
Like seeing that a ball on a string demonstration of conservation of angular momentum does not accelerate like a Ferrari engine as is genuinely predicted by physics and thinking that this is proof that the law of conservation of angular momentum is wrong.
0
0
2
@nathaliejacoby1
According to many PhD physicists, any proof which they cannot defeat and do not want to address can be called spam and then censored.
0
0
1
@vivissiah
I am a naturally rude person in your fantasy of what rude means, but in reality you are being rude evading my proof.
1
0
0
@MythinformedMKE
How did it happen that modern physicists have gone barking mad. There is mass psychosis. everybody believes that angular momentum is conserved and is hostile to the person who points out and proves and shows examples that it is not.
0
0
3
@realDonaldTrump
Dear Sir,
Can you please help me to fix a really big problem in the world?
The problem is that Angular momentum is not conserved.
Scientists have been deceived by an embarrassing perceptual error.
1
0
2
@KbarisHatipoglu
@ValaAfshar
@RexChapman
Like an engineer who imagines that angular momentum is conserved when all his equations conserve regular momentum and contradict conservation of angular momentum.
1
0
1
@JadeMasterMath
Since a proof is a logical argument, you have to show false premiss or illogic or accept the conclusion.
ie: The burden of proof is on your shoulders. Stop trying to shift it.
0
1
3
@engineers_feed
Angular momentum is not conserved. Just because you have a strange desperate desire to believe it is, does not mean that it is. Humanity is being held back by our belief in something false and our irrational desire to deny things which we have imagined are true for long are false
3
1
3
I can show you a calculation which shows COAM impossible compared to reality and you can just say "friction" and neglect reductio ad absurdum proof.
I can show independent experiment perfectly confirming my prediction and you can just say "not good enough"
No evidence convinces.
1
0
2
@angryfermion
Perhaps you could get some data confirming conservation of angular energy because angular momentum conservation is falsified but science is all out of facing up to evidence.
1
0
2
The only notifications that come into my feed are from Elon Musk.
Real exciting place you got here.
1
0
2
@thePiggsBoson
You forgot about the angular momentum paradox.
A typical classroom ball on a string demonstration of conservation of angular momentum is predicted to do 12000 rpm which is directly a paradox.
1
0
3
Why do scientists claim to have defeated my paper in the past, when all they did was neglect it? It is fucking insane.
3
0
2
@WorldAndScience
It is absolute fantasy to assume that nature is wrong because it disagrees with the theory. The reason that dark matter makes up the vast majority of the universe while we cannot actually observe it, is because the theory is wrong.
1
0
3
@astro_jaz
Just like scientists lose their minds when they realise it is angular energy that is conserved and not angular momentum.
2
0
2
@ProfFeynman
Actually it is the abundance of
#psychosis
that is stopping you accepting that a prediction being wrong means the theory is wrong.
0
0
2
@zaaatch
Yes, it is true that angular momentum is not conserved and it is also true that you will be hated if you tell the truth about it.
0
0
1
@FeynmanBot
How much degree of certainty is there in the prediction of conservation of angular momentum that a hand held ball on a string demonstration, as is typically conducted should approximate 12000 rpm?
0
0
0
@LeeMuttockCoach
@ProfFeynman
I have discovered that angular momentum is not conserved and if I “think like a scientist” I would rather keep the discovery to myself because scientists are the ones insulting me in desperation to neglect all the evidence.
0
0
3
@scienceClub01
When you master in physics, you are incapable of predicting the outcome of a ball on a string demonstration of conservation of angular momentum,
0
0
3
again with straw man evasion we are doing a ball on a string in which the radius is reduced and not extended please address the argument instead of making up nonsense.
1
0
3
@_divyasharmaa
@ProfFeynman
Yes, yank harder and harder and eventually a ball on a string demonstration will spin like a Ferrari engine does … except that it never will because physics is wrong.
0
0
3
@Mindfulness_DQ
Every single other person has given up on me.
Even the ones that think they are supporting me still imagine that I am wrong.
Which is literally giving up on me.
0
0
3
What the fuck is wrong with you? How the hell can you imagine that 12000 rpm is a reasonable just because you can say the word "friction"? You mental case.
1
1
2
@WKCosmo
The existence of a single example which falsifies a theory, does falsify the theory and that is not pseudoscience, that is fact.
1
0
0
@AngeSurTerre197
@spicytakes69
@physicsnoob5
@BallsOnStrings
False, you have failed to point out my mistake and started yanking and fudging instead as proven by the fact that you do not tackle my proof at all and neglect it entirely.
2
0
0
@spicytakes69
@physicsnoob5
@AngeSurTerre197
@BallsOnStrings
Nope. You are thinking wishfully. Because the fact that cited existing physics claims that friction is negligible by neglecting it, shows that you are shifting the goalposts, which is illogical, isn’t it?
1
0
0
Any engineer prepared to make a prediction for a ball on a string demonstration of conservation of angular momentum which starts at 2 rps and has the radius reduced to ten percent?
I know that you predict 1200 rpm and I need to show a delusional moron that you do not predict 12k
0
0
2
It is very clear from this graph that the actual orbit of a satellite oscillates differently to the way that our existing theory oscillates. This should give you a hint that you should listen to me, because it is direct independent experimental proof, that our theory is wrong.
1
0
2