Maklovitz_osu Profile Banner
Maklovitz Profile
Maklovitz

@Maklovitz_osu

Followers
1K
Following
44K
Statuses
5K

OSU #1 in leaderboard & #2 in score ranking | discord: maklowitz

Warsaw, Poland
Joined August 2020
Don't wanna be here? Send us removal request.
@Maklovitz_osu
Maklovitz
1 year
50,000 leaderboard scores achieved! I have a top50 on 46.7% of all ranked+loved maps! ~53.9% of my submitted ranked+loved scores are top50s and wanna raise this to 60% when I'll be completing OSU (15k maps left; mostly they're free leaderboard)
Tweet media one
Tweet media two
4
4
112
@Maklovitz_osu
Maklovitz
2 days
@yary_nicht_lary it will not This conversation showed me that gnahus would have to set LAN scores matching his own topplays to make these people understand he's legit lmao
@jewchewer63
BlackAristotle
3 days
@fade_702 we're gonna feast on his dogshit csr aim 1k at LAN yep
2
0
45
@Maklovitz_osu
Maklovitz
2 days
@jewchewer63 @fade_702 maybe i overslept the time when he dominated the aim scene, but overall I think me vs you over vs underestimate the difference between his skill and his LAN performance Fingers crossed he'll outperform his previous LAN performance today. Can't wait for an osureport post otherwise
0
0
3
@Maklovitz_osu
Maklovitz
2 days
@jewchewer63 @fade_702 1) pp ranking position is a good estimator of skill but you're acting like pp = skill 2) Show me cookiezi, ryuk, chicony, rafis or tuna's 1k pp or outstading play on LAN cuz I'm curious if their LAN skill is really better than gnahus'
1
0
4
@Maklovitz_osu
Maklovitz
2 days
@jewchewer63 @fade_702 nah, Id say he's like top10-15 in skill, just abusing maps that gives pp more than other skilled players like malisz or forum. Ok, we can change 95% to 75%, assuming gnahus is an average top1-20 player and 5 players (25%) proved their skill in LAN
1
0
3
@Maklovitz_osu
Maklovitz
2 days
@jewchewer63 @fade_702 ok, and 95% other topplayers didn't "perform relatively within their skill range at the time of LAN events" so why would gnahus' LAN 1kpp not prove his skill? I think you're just too harsh for him (or not harsh enough for that 95% other topplayers
1
0
5
@Maklovitz_osu
Maklovitz
2 days
@jewchewer63 @fade_702 Idk if most of topplayers set or could a LAN score that would satisfy your point. Is there any data of topplayers vs their LAN topplays?
1
0
4
@Maklovitz_osu
Maklovitz
2 days
@jewchewer63 @fade_702 I can't do 400pp for months and probably wouldn't be able to get 300pp on a LAN setup, while my topplay is >500pp. Lock me up asap
1
0
3
@Maklovitz_osu
Maklovitz
2 days
@tsunyoku Ok I changed my mind - mod multipliers and first place ranks on profile are the top1 priority since like 10 months ago. The rest is 2nd+ priority imo
0
0
6
@Maklovitz_osu
Maklovitz
2 days
@tsunyoku I understand we consider different things more important than others but I think this is not a thing that deserve over 1 year of waiting. Leaderboard meta is a thing and "no strict need for urgency" you could say about pp rebalances, yet people get mad and they appear faster
1
0
5
@Maklovitz_osu
Maklovitz
2 days
@tsunyoku It's definetely not a priority as far as I know :/
1
0
10
@Maklovitz_osu
Maklovitz
2 days
@Maklovitz_osu
Maklovitz
1 month
@willyosu Assuming this goes viral I'm posting the summary of 2 questionnaire studies (n=68 & 26 participants) conducted last year 1) 2)
Tweet media one
0
1
12
@Maklovitz_osu
Maklovitz
2 days
@jewchewer63 @fade_702 So if he sets 1k at LAN it still won't be definite that he's legit? Your initial argument could be used to undermine anyone's legitimacy, couldn't it?
1
0
11
@Maklovitz_osu
Maklovitz
2 days
@hank1312 @NigdyWiecejPiS TIL jestem kolesiem Morawieckiego xDD
0
0
0
@Maklovitz_osu
Maklovitz
2 days
@kippysaur Connect the dots... we were blind to the hidden message...
Tweet media one
0
0
19
@Maklovitz_osu
Maklovitz
3 days
@TheShadowxdd everything is wrong but the last object of the combo color is being hit xD
0
0
2
@Maklovitz_osu
Maklovitz
4 days
@memecrashes Finally some good stuff
0
0
13
@Maklovitz_osu
Maklovitz
5 days
@thepolandnews_ Przepraszam Roberta Makłowicza za to, że naruszyłem jego dobra osobiste określając go w sposób, który według mojego zamiaru miał go ośmieszyć i poniżyć w opinii publicznej, a także naruszyć jego rzetelność dziennikarską.
1
0
10