@AZbroker @Shanraal @Glenn_Diesen I'm not at all convinced, but I can see someone think this is a sufficient preliminary proof. As far as I'm concerned, it's insufficient and it doesn't make any sense. There is zero interoperability, any NKs would be a nuisance, leading to more KIAs, not an asset.

@jodypm_dev @AlpToygar1 @elonmusk Would do, but on Sat

@RoKhanna I’m starting to think a chunk of Americans do not know what the word immigration means. Temporary visits, such as permitted by these visas, are not immigration.

@Shanraal @AZbroker @Glenn_Diesen S. Korea was never a good source for anything related to N. Korea. But I’m not asking about them. Do you believe there are N. Koreans troops fighting Ukraine?

@Shanraal @AZbroker @Glenn_Diesen To clarify: do you actually believe NK soldiers are involved in the fighting?

@Shanraal @AZbroker @Glenn_Diesen You seem to suggest Ru doesn’t have drones. It had fewer drones in the beginning, but it had long since reached parity if not advantage. Also Ru has an edge in jamming and electronic warfare. Why you think it’s 2:1 when UA artillerymen are now fighting as infantry - I don’t know

@JackPosobiec This is not an iPhone though?

@AZbroker @nausea_4life @Glenn_Diesen Because it’s a convenient way to minimize losses. Neither land nor speed are in the KPIs.

@AZbroker @nausea_4life @Glenn_Diesen It’s not a very dynamic battlefield so accuracy doesn’t matter much, fortifications won’t run away.

@AZbroker @Glenn_Diesen One reason is Russia’s advantage in artillery, rocketry and aviation. Another reason is that Russian army is larger. If Ru loses 2 experienced soldiers for each UA exp.soldier, then at some point UA would have no experienced soldiers but Ru would have. At that point 2:1 -> 1:10

@mylilyofvalley @RustamAmirov6 @innerchuckle Довольно часто просьбы связаны с низким уровнем развития телепатии у мужчин.

@BursaWenDao @zhao_dashuai They do. Capital is the problem though. Also tech industry requires certain infrastructure. It’s far below sufficient level.

@nuanced_nl @Kanthan2030 Yeah, it’s an interesting point. At this point Chinese firewall might be protecting western media from the Chinese more than the Chinese from western media 😁

@jodypm_dev @AlpToygar1 @elonmusk Well, we can try

@AlpToygar1 @jodypm_dev @elonmusk I’m sorry, but your (counter?) argument isn’t clear to me.

@Natural_Fallacy @radfugee Fair point. I think he explained it somewhere that his take is to let the guest talk as much as he can. Then the viewers would be the ultimate judges. Or maybe I’m just mixing him up with someone else.

@jodypm_dev @AlpToygar1 @elonmusk On whether other nations must be forced: what did you mean by the last 2 paragraphs above then? I think forcing follows invariably from that.

@jodypm_dev @AlpToygar1 @elonmusk No issues with any of these points. I just don’t think Twitter itself is conducive to any substantive debate. 250 symbols (or whatever the current limit is) is sufficient to send someone off, but not to develop an argument.

@Natural_Fallacy @radfugee He is interviewing them, not debating them. These are different genres.