Jerry_grey2002 Profile Banner
Jerry's China Profile
Jerry's China

@Jerry_grey2002

Followers
88K
Following
88K
Statuses
31K

I won't automatically follow back people who don't interact with me.

Zhongshan, Guangdong
Joined December 2015
Don't wanna be here? Send us removal request.
@Jerry_grey2002
Jerry's China
11 hours
@LearnerKip If he's paid by US State Department, or paid by US AID, or any other government department, I have absolutely no problem with that, it's his perogative What I have a problem with, is the claim of independence
0
0
0
@Jerry_grey2002
Jerry's China
11 hours
The US is eating itself alive Every action Trump takes is an indication of how badly they're treating their own diseases I wonder if Trump knows any other tactic than sanctions because that's what this is, he's sanctioning fellow Americans now
@GuntherEagleman
Gunther Eagleman™
16 hours
BREAKING: Trump just BANNED former Secretary of State Antony Blinken from ALL federal buildings! OUTSTANDING!
Tweet media one
12
11
72
@Jerry_grey2002
Jerry's China
11 hours
@LearnerKip The very fact that aid is needed in Gaza is what's tainted - we seem to forget when supplying aid to people in need that the need caused by the fact that we, westerners, either allowed an invasion or created the environment for one to happen Yes, aid to Gaza is tainted
1
0
0
@Jerry_grey2002
Jerry's China
1 day
What a great way to approach a problem - come and see for yourselves, China has challenges, we all have challenges, but everything you're reading and hearing, from even the "beloved" BBC, you now know to be contrived and paid for BS
@WhileTravelling
Evrim Kanbur
1 day
I share facts from China as a foreigner living in Shanghai for more than a decade. But some people can’t handle the truth. Every time I talk about China’s rapid development, the same tired comment pops up: “Stop glorifying China!” Listen, folks, with this level of ignorance, facing the future is impossible. If you think calling something good automatically makes it bad, that’s not logic, that’s bitterness, insecurity, and sheer intellectual rot. For years, a manufactured narrative has been drilled into your subconscious: “If something good happens in Asia, it must be Japan. If something bad happens, it must be China.” That’s not reality, that’s propaganda. If you actually learned about what Japan did in Nanjing, you’d choke on your own disbelief. But instead, the only words you parrot are: “Tank” and “Uyghurs.” When I point out that these talking points, some people lose their minds. I have Uyghur friends and neighbors living here and I share a part of their lives but guess what? They choose to ignore. It’s not just me saying this, Uyghurs themselves post about their lives, homes, and jobs openly on social media. Go look. See for yourself. No one is here to convince you. China Is Advancing at Lightspeed. But Some People Need to Keep Pretending It’s Collapsing. Spreading “China is falling apart!” narratives while the country is making historic progress? That’s not ignorance, that’s deliberate deception. And who does this deception hurt? Investors, business leaders, families planning their children’s education. Now, what does “China is developing at lightspeed” actually mean? It means tax revenue is invested back into the country, in infrastructure, education,transportation, technology, healthcare, and even space research. Meanwhile, the U.S. spends $1.6 billion in taxpayer money just on propaganda, just to keep up the illusion that it’s still on top. China doesn’t waste money on hype. It just works. And in the long run, results speak louder than spin. Want to Actually Understand China? Stop Swallowing Anti-China Propaganda. If you want to see reality, first you have to detox from years of Western-funded anti-China disinformation. The same individuals, organizations, and media outlets that spent years spreading fake, USAID-funded anti-China narratives? Their funding is drying up, and now they’re crying on social media about how their propaganda can’t be sustained anymore. So do yourself a favor: Diversify your news sources. Because when you send me badly mistranslated BBC’s articles, I just laugh. BBC was funded by USAID as well. Seriously, stop wasting your time on garbage reporting. Truth has a funny way of outlasting propaganda. Don’t be shocked when it happens.
Tweet media one
2
20
101
@Jerry_grey2002
Jerry's China
1 day
@LearnerKip Sory but anyone claiming to be an independent journalist and accepting funds from USAID is not fine. At least not with me
1
0
4
@Jerry_grey2002
Jerry's China
2 days
@commiepommie A great finish James - the last paragraph sums it all up There are allegations and there is evidence - Western media is an expert on publishing one but has never, EVER provided the other
2
2
14
@Jerry_grey2002
Jerry's China
2 days
Brian, as he usually does, absolutely nails it here The rhetoric isn't stopping, it's just coming into the Administraion's (Trump's) control Future grants will have loyalty to Trump as No1 criterion then then anti-whatever the Trump regime considers important as the rest
@BrianJBerletic
Brian Berletic
2 days
🇺🇸The USAID Limited Hangout Continues... USAID's "exposure" remains focused mainly on partisan squabbling and wedge issues. There is still no mention of the many millions spent during the previous Trump administration itself on regime change including via USAID but also the CIA and NED in Venezuela or propaganda targeting China. It's being made to look like only "Democrats" were involved when it was bipartisan. Worse still, the Trump administration has laid out a foreign policy that will necessitate continued foreign interference and global propaganda campaigns conducted under previous administrations including both Biden's and Trump's previous term in office. The goal is to conduct damage control vs. growing awareness of and effective defenses against US propaganda and interference, salvage, sharpen, and streamline future ops.
Tweet media one
Tweet media two
Tweet media three
1
6
23
@Jerry_grey2002
Jerry's China
2 days
@jeff3103747 Absdolutely correct, BBC online, BBC outside of the UK is completely unregulated - and it shows Here's my take on it:
0
0
1
@Jerry_grey2002
Jerry's China
2 days
Bethany has not a care in the world for the millions of starving, sick or disabled children that the "charity front" of USAID was supporting She's concerned because her anti-China funding is withdrawn That should tell any critical reader everything they need to know
@BethanyAllenEbr
Bethany 貝書穎
3 days
Because of the U.S. funding freezing, the entire global ecosystem of China nonprofits is facing an extinction event. I'm not exaggerating for clicks. This is really what is happening. Read my piece below:
7
41
204
@Jerry_grey2002
Jerry's China
3 days
The US wold do well to listen to people who know and @mitchpresnick knows
@mitchpresnick
Mitch Presnick 柏力
3 days
As the author of an article (Harvard Business Review Aug 26, 2024 - link in pinned post and comments below) and as a primary advocate in the U.S. for leveraging China’s manufacturing and technological strengths to advance U.S. strategic objectives, I recognize the potential connection between new U.S. tariffs on Chinese imports, and the potential to stimulate fresh Chinese industrial investments in the U.S. My approach suggests effectively harnessing China’s capabilities towards three key U.S. objectives: 1. Reshoring U.S. manufacturing through 50/50 joint ventures (JVs) with Chinese MNCs. 2. Restoring U.S. technological competitiveness thru tech transfer requirements as a prerequisite for these JVs. 3. Rebuilding U.S. supply chains with Chinese participation as a prerequisite for these JVs. Strategic advanced industries that could be reshored in the U.S. under 50/50 JVs with Chinese cooperation include: •Electric vehicles (EVs) •Solar panels & photovoltaic cells •Advanced energy & hydropower •Robotics and automation •Advanced manufacturing •Rare earths processing •Drones (including flying cars) •Digital infrastructure (6G/7G) •Shipbuilding •High-speed rail & construction •Energy storage and batteries •Construction engineering •Advanced materials •Ports automation and operations •Advanced infrastructure building Rather than dwelling on the differences and challenges, it’s worth shifting our focus to the immense potential. The U.S. and China have successfully executed this kind of industrial transformation once before—in China. Now, we have the opportunity to do it again —this time in the U.S. and under a new paradigm for bilateral relations— one that is far more transactional unemotional and pragmatic. Exactly as Nixon and Mao originally envisioned. Just business. These strategies mirror the very policies China successfully implemented from 1995 to 2015 to attract investments from the U.S. and G7 nations (including Hong Kong, Japan, South Korea, Taiwan, and Singapore) during its own manufacturing reshoring and technological competitiveness restoration efforts. There is no viable path to achieving these goals within the necessary timeframe without active, motivated Chinese participation and involvement. Likewise, China’s ability to maintain long-term access to the U.S. market will likely become more difficult without its active participation as a partner in efforts to help restore American competitiveness. Most critically, if the U.S. fails to make tangible progress toward these objectives, we risk a bifurcated world—less stable, less secure, and far more precarious for regions like Australia and Europe—while significantly heightening tensions in the U.S.-China relationship. Conversely, if the U.S. and China embrace these cooperative efforts as the foundation for a new paradigm—one grounded in pragmatism and mutual self-interest, free from emotional ‘love-hate’ swings—we could establish the basis for a peaceful and prosperous 21st century. For the sake of U.S. interests and U.S. China relations as well as global stability, I am working diligently to ensure these ideas are considered by the Trump administration.
0
0
17
@Jerry_grey2002
Jerry's China
3 days
@GarethOrganic Nah, this is a "charity" run by the BBC that receives the donations Impact Media is a propaganda arm and the funding goes a lot deeper than just USAID - I'm researching it now for a video later
0
0
1
@Jerry_grey2002
Jerry's China
3 days
@C0blivious Yes - I'm doing a report on this now - Action Media is a charity, it broadcasts under BBC auspices into any place where US "soft power" is required - it operates in Myanmar, India, Indonesia and other places and is entirely unregulated by OfCom
0
0
0
@Jerry_grey2002
Jerry's China
3 days
@Arthur560302 Yes - the UN and various departments in it are donors to a BBC charity called Media Impact Media Impact operates outside of OfCom regulations brining "democracy" to places like Mayanmar, Africa and Indonesia - I'm researching this now for a video, lots more to come on it
0
0
2
@Jerry_grey2002
Jerry's China
3 days
@Macro_Core_View @kakajusaiyou The BBC itself isn't funded by USAID, it's only 2.16 million pounds but there's a lot more to the story, I'm researching now Video to come soon
0
0
3
@Jerry_grey2002
Jerry's China
4 days
Interesting the number of responses asking "Do you have a better solution" or words to that effect A better solution must include the millions of people who've lived in the region since before Jesus lived there Any solution without them = ethnic cleansing AKA "final solution"
@RnaudBertrand
Arnaud Bertrand
4 days
So Trump is announcing that "the US will take over the Gaza strip, we'll own it" (after ethnically cleansing all Palestinians): Notwithstanding the unreal cynicism of it, what "owning Gaza" would concretely mean is a merger of Israel and the U.S., and the U.S. permanently entangled in the Middle-East. Israel's problems would be the U.S.'s problems like never before, and the U.S. would be permanently associated with Israel in the eyes of the world. Relatively ironic right after Trump got elected to put "America first" which I'm pretty sure didn't include settling a colony in the most conflictual land on earth... And in terms of soft power, not sure Americans have fully thought through the consequences of becoming one and the same with an apartheid ethno-nationalist state that's abhorred by such a large proportion of the world's population. It's very much part and parcel of Trump's usual modus operandi, which is to own whatever accusations are thrown at him, to never make any excuse and double down. Which admittedly worked for him domestically because Americans came to interpret it as refreshing authenticity or "telling it like it is". The world will undoubtedly see an America-Israel merger as authentic in that it'd recognize de jure what was de-facto already the case, but the massive difference in this case is that there's no constituency outside America for "make America great again": the US finally being honest about being an ethno-nationalist colonial power will likely instead be seen by billions of people as the final confirmation that the U.S. is definitely not on their side.
2
13
60
@Jerry_grey2002
Jerry's China
7 days
A good analysis and hard to refute too, well researched
@Somali_ICS
Somali Institute of Chinese Studies
10 days
This analytical essay presents a well-structured argument explaining the interdependence of the four factors (political stability, infrastructure, economic growth, and technological rise) behind China's success, focusing on cause-and-effect relationships
1
12
31
@Jerry_grey2002
Jerry's China
9 days
@sherberrtttt Yes there were last time I was there in 2019, my friend @ChinaTeacher1 was there more recently and tells me they've relaxed it a little - police posts are not a problem though, they're friendly and cooperative - with us, they gave us drinks and fruit most times
0
0
4
@Jerry_grey2002
Jerry's China
9 days
@hazza_harding You're mistaking it for Xizang Hazza, there's nothing to stop visa free travel anywhere where there are no restrictions - Xinjiang has no restrictions, unless you know something I don't? If you can point me to a Chinese policy, I'll make a correction, not an ACT information tho!
1
0
1