![jasonvu.tech (π¦π ,π§) Profile](https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/1861763032319488000/pGkwwfsK_x96.jpg)
jasonvu.tech (π¦π ,π§)
@JasonvuTech
Followers
1K
Following
2K
Statuses
1K
Ex @KyberNetwork @KrystalDeFi. Co-founder of @VemoNetwork. LPing for fund, and doing shitposts on @Cesar0x76 for fun.
Joined April 2021
I aggree on that. But keep in mind that tokens issued by liquid wrappers are not LSTs which you can redeem for originals at any moment. Of course, those derivative tokens are perfect for partial transactions or composability, but blackholing originals of users are criminal to me π€ Actually, I just want to raise my opinion is if a liquid wrapper wants to issue derivative tokens, those tokens should have all benefit the originals have, including: - Redeemable - Voting power - Staking reward Then it would be the perfect design for this kind of derivative tokens.
0
0
2
In my opinion, liquid wrappers that blackhole users' underlying assets are evil practices. It's essentially stealing assets right in front of people. Historically, has anyone been able to point to a successful liquid version that maintains a 1:1 peg to its underlying assets? The answer is zero.
0
0
0
In my opinion, liquid wrappers that blackhole users' underlying assets are evil practices. It's essentially stealing assets right in front of people. Historically, has anyone been able to point to a successful liquid version that maintains a 1:1 peg to its underlying assets? The answer is zero." Me & @VemoNetwork team is working on better liquid version of $BGT that will retain all the original nature of this token. Will announce soon!
Some Thoughts (Not FUD) on Farming Strategies with @InfraredFinance As previously outlined in my Temporary Farming Strategy on @berachain. I had an in-depth discussion with @JasonvuTech and @Neoo_Nav regarding how to optimize Berachain farming strategies, particularly in light of the marketβs uncertainty following the recent FED meeting. All three of us identified a way to maximize yield efficiency using the iBGT vault, currently boasting an APR of 656.29% at @InfraredFinance. However, fundamental things needs to be addressed: Much like Curve Wars in previous uptrends, Infrared operates as both an LSD provider on Berachain (iBERA) and a Liquid Wrapper (iBGT). 1) Understanding iBGTβs Per Infraredβs official documentation: βiBGT is a liquid wrapper for BGT tokens. It is backed 1:1 by the BGT earned by liquidity deposited into Infraredβs vaults. iBGT does not earn the rewards associated with BGT unless staked. iBGT is not redeemable for BGT. iBGT allows holders to stake (via Infraredβs staking vault) and earn all associated BGT rewards.β This non-redeemability of iBGT introduces an interesting dynamic: β’ Unlike BGT, which can be redeemed back into BERA (1:1), iBGT has no redemption mechanism. β’ This makes iBGT highly inflationary over time relative to BGT, as more iBGT continues to be minted from LPs staking in Infrared vaults. β’ In the short term, iBGT could experience bullish momentum as its high APR (656.29%) attracts capital into farming strategies. Instead of adding LP and staking to farm iBGT, users may opt to directly swap into iBGT for yield optimization. β’ However, the liquidity for iBGT remains low (~$31K), meaning this strategy may have scalability limitations. 2) Comparing iBGT to Wrapped CRV Models Much like Wrapped CRV derivatives, iBGT itself has no inherent value outside of capturing governance incentives across protocols. Curve Wars & veCRV Dynamics: β’ Many Liquid Wrappers (e.g., Convex, StakeDAO) locked CRV to accumulate veCRV, consolidating governance influence over Curve. β’ When incentives fell below expectations, a sell-off pressure emerged on wrapped CRV derivatives. β’ Similarly, iBGTβs lack of a redemption mechanism means that it is purely reliant on farming incentives to maintain its value. 3) Why iBGT May Face Less Bearish Pressure Than Wrapped CRV 1β£High APR & Honey Rewards: The current APR remains attractive, paid partially in Honey, which encourages users to continue farming. 2β£Greater Utility in Berachain DeFi: Unlike wrapped CRV, iBGT is actively integrated across multiple DeFi protocols, such as: @beraborrow (iBGT as collateral for borrowing NECT). Future integrations with other Berachain DeFi projects could expand its use cases further. 3) Is iBGT's Non-Redeemability a Governance Play? Historically, governance-focused DeFi projects have used non-redeemable liquid wrappers to solidify their influence. β’ Curve Wars, Pendle Wars, and veTOKEN models have shown that governance tokens with non-redeemable wrappers enable protocol teams to control governance more effectively. β’ In this case, Infraredβs strategy could be a calculated political move to strengthen its position in the Berachain ecosystem. 4) Final Thoughts β’ While iBGTβs non-redeemability introduces inflationary risks, its value may still be captured through strategic partnerships in Berachain DeFi. β’ The biggest unknown: Can the long-term demand for iBGT offset its structural inflation? Would love to hear insights from Berachain OG builders on this topic: @Berasearch @0xRaito_ @capnjackbearow
3
0
6
RT @phtevenstrong: HUGE shout out to @capnjackbearow for joining us on today's episode of the Dojo Podcast. I know the markets are abysmalβ¦
0
25
0
RT @VemoNetwork: π Big day for @OneAnalog they TGE today at 11 AM UTC! Analog is building a powerful interoperability layer, enabling seaβ¦
0
10
0
Over time, users will gradually enjoy @VemoNetwork unique approach. While preserving the fundamental concept of locked positions, Vemo gives users the flexibility to exit their positions whenever needed. Thank @Milk_Trudge for this incredible thread! π«‘π«‘π«‘
Unlocking the True Potential of Non-Transferable Assets: Vemo Network & The Fluffle NFT The recent launch of The Fluffle NFT by @0xMegaMafia has sparked significant debate. Priced at 1 $ETH, this soulbound NFT is non-transferable, meaning holders cannot sell it on secondary markets. While long-term ownership could yield strategic advantages within the @megaeth_labs ecosystem, the upfront commitment required has left many questioning its value proposition. But what if there was a way to introduce liquidity and transferability to assets traditionally considered locked? This is where @VemoNetwork, founded by @JasonvuTech, steps in, offering a groundbreaking solution for unlocking non-transferable assets in the crypto space.
1
0
5
Gammaaaaa π±π±π±
The DCA champ is back at it again on $GS, making it one of the best performing alts in my pf during the current bloodbath Accumulating @GammaSwapLabs before the Yield token is live i guess Imagine Ethena, but for Concentrated LPs with way higher APRs, and at a fraction of the mcap
1
0
5
RT @KyberNetwork: KyberSwap Treasury Grant Completed On 1st February 2024, KyberSwap launched the Treasury Grant Program to support Elastiβ¦
0
32
0
When the @KyberNetwork hack first occurred, like many other Defi hacks I've witnessed over the past 6 years, I had already mentally prepared myself to accept the loss of funds as part of the game. At the time, there were various discussions in the Defi community about easier ways out for Kyber founders, such as apologizing to victims and declaring bankruptcy due to irreparable damage (a route many protocols took after being hacked) or even negotiating with the hacker to... sell Kyber for $0, with victims receiving 50% of their lost funds as a "humanitarian" gesture. Either option would have been a safe landing for the Kyber team. However, instead of compromising with the hacker (letting wrongdoing prevail), the Kyber team stood firm, rejected the hacker's not-so-bad offer, and took full responsibility to compensate victims 100% for their losses (amounting to $47 million at the time). Wow! A year later, they kept their promise, and I received 100% of my lost funds (based on the USD value at the time of the hack). To achieve this, I learned that the Kyber team had to make painful adjustments behind the scenes, including cutting 75% of their workforce, reducing salaries and bonuses, discontinuing resource-heavy projects to focus on revenue-generating ones, and even the co-founders contributing personal funds alongside the company treasury to cover the compensation. They also faced immense pressure to generate enough revenue to fulfill their commitment over the past year. What did they gain in return? Perhaps: - Respect from fellow builders in the industry? - A renewed belief that Defi can still have happy endings? - Or simply, the Kyber team prioritizing integrity, driven by their core values to do whatβs right? Iβm not entirely sure. But in a time when many builders claim to contribute to the industryβs progress while secretly prioritizing personal gainβoften at the expense of their usersβKyberβs actions made me deeply respect them. I now see them on par with top-tier global protocols (not just in Vietnam), regardless of $KNC price. I donβt know what else to say except thank you to the Kyber team & especially to 2 co-founder as @loi_luu and @vutran54 for helping me recover my lost funds. You remain a huge inspiration for me to contribute, even in small ways, to Defiβa wild, dangerous, and often ugly space, yet one filled with potential, allure, and humanity. π«‘
1
1
18
RT @haydenzadams: π¦π¦π¦π¦ Uniswap v4 is here!!! π¦π¦π¦π¦ Incredibly excited to launch the biggest, baddest version of the Uniswap protocol yet,β¦
0
169
0