![Henry Rockford Profile](https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/1855312227852783616/A4gzYzAI_x96.jpg)
Henry Rockford
@Henry_Rockford
Followers
50
Following
10K
Statuses
434
RT @Henry_Rockford: @ArmandDoma Place this action in the larger context. I think US taxpayers have zero obligations to non-Americans, but w…
0
1
0
Place this action in the larger context. I think US taxpayers have zero obligations to non-Americans, but with the national debt exceeding $200,000 per taxpayer, the idea becomes absurd - a betrayal. You are right about money for HIV in South Africa undoubtedly saving more lives than money for LGBT in Serbia. Consider the $2 million for sex changes in Guatemala. Consider money for the transgender comic book in Peru or the transgender opera in Colombia. Are these good-faith efforts to save lives? To improve the human condition generally? Of course not. Even granting all of your beliefs and premises, Armand, this would be wildly inefficient. So, why did the White House spend money on these causes? I ask myself, and the answer is obvious. These are the people who draped the Pride Progress flag over the White House like it was the national flag. Who informed us it was a "sin" (Biden's word) not to allow permanent sex changes for minors. Who pushed for men in women's sports. Who wanted the US taxpayer to fund sex changes for illegal immigrants in prision. Who, in every way, were fanatically pro-transgenderism, without limit. So I have my answer. It isn't about saving lives. Let's put this together. In an effort to push LGBT religion, the Biden administration spent taxpayer money abroad, diverting it both from genuine humanitarian missions and from genuine US interests. This is despite our terrible debt. I ask myself why, and I remember the Left's broad disdain for Americans, for the sucessful, just for white people frankly. How we perpetually need to "do better." How we need to "be less white." How we need to atone for things generations ago that we personally had nothing to do with. And so I know the motive. Contempt motivates them to steal our money and spend it, not on humanitarianism, but on their LGBT mission, proselytizing abroad.
0
1
0
It's always pointless to reason with the woke 😡 The dummies literally only understand outrage and power
@Henry_Rockford @ArmandDoma Fine, that’s your policy opinion. It’s not malicious or fraudulent for others to disagree, and stop pretending it has anything to do with fiscal discipline or respect for taxpayer’s money when you’re happy to rationalize giving a pass to other federal spending we agree is dumb.
0
0
1
Jesus fucking christ. You can't fucking read. A dumb wokie hyena like all your kind. I explained patiently, three times, that I don't approve of or "give a pass" to inefficiency, but at least it's intended for, I don't know, fucking US INTERESTS which we both know you understand. And as I already carefully explained (and pointlessly, I guess), frivolous spending completely out of line with US interests overseas amounts to theft. This shit was hidden from the public. I know why. Do you know why? Yes, of course. Of course you do. You understand perfectly. You piece of shit. Like the rest of them.
1
0
0
@VexIsDeadInside @mushycrouton I hate you fucking idiots and I see no reason not to say so. "Man" means nothing to you. Gender means nothing. It's all just a joke 🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡
1
0
0
RT @Henry_Rockford: @GuyIncognito3 @ArmandDoma Well, as you know this has nothing to do with building ties with foreign nations, and everyt…
0
1
0
Well, as you know this has nothing to do with building ties with foreign nations, and everything to do with pushing LGBT using whatever cash is at hand... in this case, taxpayer money that the activists have no respect for. As for "selective free housing" the secretary of defense is in charge of 3 million people. My brother in christ, he has been selected. He is one of the select. Yes. At the very top of US military command. No-one says anything about the VP's residence at the Naval Observatory and the SecDef has to be secure himself. If Defense dollars are going to much to paint, then find another Defense purpose, e.g. making the Secretary's house more secure. But there is no legitimate rerouting of money for LGBT shit. It's just pilfering. It has to be cut off.
1
1
1
@GuyIncognito3 @ArmandDoma Lesbian dance theory for squirrels is not a US interest. Using US $$ is therefore theft. My outrage is not selective, as I've patiently explained twice now. Inefficiency is unfortunate but the $$ is in service to US national security and personnel
1
0
0
RT @Henry_Rockford: @GuyIncognito3 @ArmandDoma Look, I never objected to your concerns about Hegseth's house, whether you're sincere or no…
0
1
0
Look, I never objected to your concerns about Hegseth's house, whether you're sincere or not. Okay, fine: say they're spending too much. Well, spending too much is... bad? What the f do you want me to say? What I hate is the contempt for my people and country. My wallet is mine. My countrymen's is theirs. Stealing our treasure is wrong. Doing so out of a hatred for Americans, or white people, or successful people, is an act of evil and an act of theft. You must understand that.
1
1
0
@GuyIncognito3 @ArmandDoma This kind of game annoys me. Spending too much money on US government property is unfortunate. Teaching lesbian dance theory to squirrels in Honduras or whatever bullshit is malicious. You know the difference🙄
1
0
0
@GuyIncognito3 @ArmandDoma His right I guess. If you wast to say they should spend less on painting — okay, I suppose? 🤷♂️
1
0
0
@VexIsDeadInside @mushycrouton So ultimately man is a word that can be interpreted as one wishes, e.g. means nothing
1
0
0
@ArmandDoma Armand. You can't be this afraid of a guy with 50 followers. Do you have anything to say or add?
0
0
0