@Pd13_94 @TheFungi669 That's what I thought

@Pd13_94 @TheFungi669 What i said > having to take little vacations on the taxpayers dollar every weekend of your less than month long presidency is hilarious What you said "HURR WELL I GUESS THEYRE JUST NOT ALLOWED TO SLEEP HUH??" Don't reproduce

@Pd13_94 @TheFungi669 He hasn't even been president a month yet he desperately needs this R&R 😂😂

@taraliyah @Imposter_Edits You have to be fuckin blind if you think Kleins won anything in the past 6 months 😂

@EndraEX3 Suddenly sleep paralysis isnt so bad

@BtcSatoshiBtc @PaulZo62 @katiebert18 @JayVTheGreat @allenanalysis What a cuck response lmao

@mike1010011 @Clacozzini @GreenTextRepost @grlicking You realize Canada is a member of NATO yes?

@OmiWaterr @joshuawoodward_ @CandlesSarah @saltedshow @ZacksJerryRig @NolanAThomas1 Im sure you will change their minds

@OmiWaterr @joshuawoodward_ @CandlesSarah @saltedshow @ZacksJerryRig @NolanAThomas1 Good job buddy now do United States v. Darby 1941

@OmiWaterr @joshuawoodward_ @CandlesSarah @saltedshow @ZacksJerryRig @NolanAThomas1 So they were wrong...in 1824. When the guy who wrote the constitution was still alive?

@OmiWaterr @joshuawoodward_ @CandlesSarah @saltedshow @ZacksJerryRig @NolanAThomas1 From only like 30 years after the constitution was ratified lmao

@Ian66910 @GG1395428491698 @OregonMapGuy @ConsumingW @sdonelan @factpostnews 2/2 Companies have never prioritized saftey, and after Raegan union membership is at an all time low, and is unlikely to recover substantially in the next decade. Who will regulate?

@Ian66910 @GG1395428491698 @OregonMapGuy @ConsumingW @sdonelan @factpostnews 1/2 Before OSHA large and strong labor unions carried the torch of workplace saftey, not companies, peaking in the 1950s. As union membership started to decline, worker injuries increased, leading to the creation of OSHA.

@OmiWaterr @joshuawoodward_ @CandlesSarah @saltedshow @ZacksJerryRig @NolanAThomas1 Youre fighting dead points mate. Read the Necessary and proper clause. Then read McCulloch v. Maryland (1819) and Gibbons v. Ogden (1824) Then finish it off with United States v. Darby (1945) if you want something osha related. Or just learn about the significant effects test.

@thatecosoc22 @NoThanks176 @NVERM0R Ofc id be infuriated, but I'd still vote for that party, because I want the chance to save the rest of my family, and I see that there are, literally, only two ways this is going to play out. The system was not going to change. X or Y is going to win. X was the ONLY chance.

@thatecosoc22 @NoThanks176 @NVERM0R Voters had a choice between party x who murdered their families but could be persuaded to stop it and party y who murdered their families and would escalate it and they chose party y because party x was in the high seat at the time. It's not hard to see why this wouldn't be wise

@OmiWaterr @joshuawoodward_ @CandlesSarah @saltedshow @ZacksJerryRig @NolanAThomas1 Almost everything affects interstate commerce. Read the necessary and proper clause

@Ian66910 @GG1395428491698 @OregonMapGuy @ConsumingW @sdonelan @factpostnews Yes. And there inlays the fundamental flaw. Saftey is ultimately the companies responsibility. It is the individuals responsibility to adhere to the guidelines the company HAS to set. If the company doesn't HAVE to set them, how can the individual take personal responsibility?

@SmokingPipeINTJ @GulledgeKurt @TedNivison Probably because we've kinda seen what happens when there's no government. People act like the federal government got this way out of nowhere and not like 300 years of trial and error lead to what it is now.