@LasagneWest @StephLynn291 @esjesjesj 3/4 of which are, like, “I want tax cuts and/or a more limited government” not MAGA.

@OregonDucks_SI A-

@JPWilcoxII @Max_Fisher Do you need some lotion? Your brain must be smooth as fuck.

@AITrailblazerQ @Max_Fisher The United States has never been anywhere near communism, you fucking retard.

@michaelrabb9 @Max_Fisher Well bury you alongside your friends, to be sure.

@SashaPhoenix @IlhanMN Your joke is based on a lie, which just makes you look stupid.

@LasagneWest @StephLynn291 @esjesjesj Like, this is funny because can you imagine a conservative even studying half of these subjects as a profession? Like, a psychologist, it’s basically impossible to be a conservative psychologist. It’s antithetical to foundational conservative behaviors.

@fox12oregon Klan meeting in the replies

@aqua_bannock @spectrm @jahimes Huh

@WenatcheeRN @BradSanJuan @JulsIsHereNow @APenguin3055 @SenMarkey Bro over here wants SCOTUS to turn us into a dictatorship

@spectrm @aqua_bannock @jahimes I’ve already given you an example of specifically allocated funds multiple times (Ukraine funds managed by usaid) btw

@aqua_bannock @spectrm @jahimes Just say you want a monarchy lol

@aqua_bannock @spectrm @jahimes The executive does have to spend money allocated by Congress lol.

@Odoyle1201 @spectrm @jahimes And it’s often even *more specific* than that, too. Congress has explicitly passed aid to Ukraine multiple times, for example, it isn’t ambiguous at all. Trump can’t just not disburse those funds lol.

@StevenOrlando87 @DefiyantlyFree @peat_ross_ If the implication was that this is widespread (in context that’s what it appears to be) then that implication is false. That’s all.

@spectrm @CroakerBC @jahimes You’re wrong for many reasons on these points, but again, if Congress appreciates funds explicitly for a specific purpose, the executive cannot sign that legislation and then later refuse to disburse those funds lol. Oh well, just watch the courts tear these plans to shreds.

@spectrm @jahimes For example, USAID: 1) was explicitly made into an independent agency in 1998 by Congress 2) has been appropriated funds for explicit purposes many times, most recently in Ukraine aid packages signed by Congress. The exec can’t destroy the agency nor can it cancel those funds

@StevenOrlando87 @DefiyantlyFree @peat_ross_ lol, people on the left have been yelling about SCOTUS misconduct for a long time, bucko. One of the first things that article notes is that SCOTUS doesn’t have a code of conduct, this doesn’t happen in other branches of government.

@jules_steward @flcro @lsmrlisa @TheRickWilson There are a bunch of studies, actually. Here is a meta-analysis. Vaccines don’t cause autism.

@spectrm @jahimes The executive cannot cancel congressional appropriated funds lol. This is basic stuff.