Daniel Raimi
@DanielRaimi
Followers
2K
Following
6K
Statuses
5K
Dad & husband. Fellow @RFF focused on an equitable energy transition. Teach @fordschool. Wrote The Fracking Debate. Host Resources Radio @ResourcesMag. + 🎵🍸🎸
Ann Arbor, MI
Joined June 2012
RT @NafisaLohawala: Had a great conversation on @DanielRaimi about Sustainable Aviation Fuels (SAFs). We discussed aviation’s climate impac…
0
1
0
Looking for something productive to do while stressing today? Matt Dalbey and I have a new @rff report about the "Energy Communities" IWG. We document the origins, key activities, and lessons learned as the IWG seeks to support an equitable transition.
0
1
3
RT @LSEGeography: 🎙️ Stephen Jarvis joins host @DanielRaimi to discuss how local opposition - often called “NIMBYism,” or Not In My Backyar…
0
1
0
RT @WaterEquityLab: Excited to highlight wastewater inequities in the U.S. & possible solutions on @rff’s podcast series, with @DanielRaimi…
0
2
0
Overall, fracking is not as important to the PA economy as it is in other major oil- and gas-producing states like TX, NM, ND, OK, AK, and others. 4/4
0
0
0
@Sammy_Roth I haven’t read this study yet, but it’s worth knowing that Howarth’s work on NG and methane emissions has been an outlier for over a decade.
1
0
4
This week marks the *300th* episode of Resources Radio @rff @ResourcesMag. And it’s a banger! @andrewrwaxman describes a recent paper estimating the local air pollution effects of CCS. Check it out!
0
1
8
RT @_josephshapiro: 🚨1 month left.🚨 Submit papers to @nberpubs project on Trade, Energy, Decarbonization, deadline 10/16. 🔗 https://t.co/…
0
25
0
How can researchers do a better job of incorporating equity issues into their computational models? That's the subject of this week's @ResourcesMag @rff podcast with the fantastic @amandagiang of @UBC. All modelers (and everyone else): check it out!
0
0
1
Check out this week’s @rff @ResourcesMag podcast featuring Catie, my fantastic friend and stellar colleague from the @fordschool!
0
2
5
@DoctorVive Disagree? Fine! Want to argue your side? Cool! Gonna bring evidence? Awesome! But going straight ad hominem (and getting the deets wrong) is lazy and embarrassing.
1
0
3