CAKlogic Profile Banner
CAK Profile
CAK

@CAKlogic

Followers
23
Following
3K
Statuses
3K

Discuss

Joined June 2023
Don't wanna be here? Send us removal request.
@CAKlogic
CAK
6 hours
@li28822869_ali Raphinha as a 9
1
0
0
@CAKlogic
CAK
8 hours
@Talentfati3 The inability to criticize Yamal is wild . He missed several chances . Failed various passes , slowed down counter attacks . He is having a bad performance.
0
0
7
@CAKlogic
CAK
10 hours
@jaaonpe @HProggy @KingOffX_ @JDVance It seems your philosophical assumptions about what a law means are at odds with any understanding
0
0
1
@CAKlogic
CAK
10 hours
@jaaonpe @HProggy @KingOffX_ @JDVance Striking a law down properly understood is merely identifying that the supreme law of the land has been violated and identifying that . Given this the legislative ruling was never actually a law.
0
0
1
@CAKlogic
CAK
10 hours
@jaaonpe @HProggy @KingOffX_ @JDVance I am not sure I understand. Determining a law is unconstitutional is generally determining that the legislature have broken a law that protects our rights . So it determining that the executive or congress have broken a law. ….
0
0
1
@CAKlogic
CAK
10 hours
@jaaonpe @HProggy @KingOffX_ @JDVance What are the differences
1
0
0
@CAKlogic
CAK
10 hours
@jaaonpe @HProggy @KingOffX_ @JDVance For even knowing a law is a law . The end state of your argument is that no law is really binding as we have no method of knowing what the laws are ? What is a motivating reason for believing the executive or legislative branch as a citizen of this republic?
1
0
0
@CAKlogic
CAK
11 hours
@jaaonpe @HProggy @KingOffX_ @JDVance So what you are stating is that the constitution was written with no ability for judges to judge what the law actually says . Your argument keeps referring to actions that we should take given the law is broken . Makes zero sense . What is the systems mechanism….
0
0
0
@CAKlogic
CAK
11 hours
@jaaonpe @HProggy @KingOffX_ @JDVance I am not sure how the mechanism for enforcement can help me identify the mechanism for holding the executive accountable. Please clarify with an abstract principle and practical example .
0
0
0
@CAKlogic
CAK
11 hours
@jaaonpe @HProggy @KingOffX_ @JDVance How would the executive or legislative branch be found to be acting illegally without judicial review?
1
0
1
@CAKlogic
CAK
1 day
1
0
2
@CAKlogic
CAK
1 day
@SomeVRdude @VibiRMCF You could have made a more honest case but this just means you have no ball knowledge.
1
0
36
@CAKlogic
CAK
1 day
@BarcaTiempo @NealGardner_ Not easily whatsoever. Unless the unexplained assumption that Atletico and Madrid have similar likelihood to accumulate points
1
0
7
@CAKlogic
CAK
2 days
@Delic8WeeFlower @balajis @SaintlyPrayers @marko_elez What are you yapping about? The first amendment gives you know right to be employed anywhere. What ???? It’s about the government refraining from adressing on your free speech in your private property not the obligation to associate with you
0
0
2
@CAKlogic
CAK
3 days
@NSKinsella @Lieboisout Most objectivist favor fractional reserve banking? Do you mean should be allowed ?
0
0
0
@CAKlogic
CAK
4 days
@thejoshad @BarcaUniversal @Score90_ Suarez in the ucl ???????
0
0
6
@CAKlogic
CAK
7 days
@IAmJustHereSoI1 @Fortis_Arduis @Kaliber717 @JDVance You got him . What an absolute troll
0
0
1
@CAKlogic
CAK
7 days
@kapoano @tkped @scottlincicome What you said makes no sense . By the majority do you mean the majority of voters ? Voting age Americans or anyone ? Do you also realize voting only tells us who you prefer not what you want .
0
0
1
@CAKlogic
CAK
7 days
@ALKEX19 @NealGardner_ Moronic idea
0
0
1