BH_Friedman Profile Banner
Ben Friedman Profile
Ben Friedman

@BH_Friedman

Followers
5K
Following
9K
Statuses
6K

Policy Director @defpriorities. Former stopper and B-Side Lounge patron. For restraint, pluralism, and the Celtics.

DC mostly. Boston in spirit.
Joined February 2017
Don't wanna be here? Send us removal request.
@BH_Friedman
Ben Friedman
4 days
NYT "analysis": Say what you want about ethnically cleansing 2 million Palestinians, but it would "disrupt a tired diplomatic paradigm."
Tweet media one
0
2
7
@BH_Friedman
Ben Friedman
6 days
A weird aspect of this is that both advocates and opponents of USAID are exaggerating the extent to which its just an adjunct of the US national security state hiding behind charity.
0
0
0
@BH_Friedman
Ben Friedman
6 days
RT @mtracey: So to recap, someone published the names of the DOGE staff -- who currently wield extreme power dictating government policy --…
0
550
0
@BH_Friedman
Ben Friedman
7 days
Yes. The lawlessness is the point. They are executive power fanatics.
@mattyglesias
Matthew Yglesias
7 days
The continuing resolution funding the government expires literally in six weeks, there is absolutely nothing stopping Republicans from writing an appropriations bill that changes spending levels rather than lawlessly trying to block payment of funds Congress already passed.
0
3
5
@BH_Friedman
Ben Friedman
10 days
With his insistence that Snowden is either a traitor or not, Warner seems to be standing up for loyalty to the national-security surveillance state as opposed to the country and to oppose Tulsi because she's nominated to be DNI without sharing his conflation.
0
0
1
@BH_Friedman
Ben Friedman
10 days
The consequences of being behind China now on artificial intelligence are primarily economic, unlike the direct security competition of Cold War space and missile programs. And AI competition may be useful for most Americans, as technology consumers, even if hurts some US firms.
0
0
2
@BH_Friedman
Ben Friedman
11 days
Still, it's foolish to put the word "legitimate" before "security concerns." It helps bad faith interlocutors say you're not just criticizing US policy but supporting Russia's. Just say NATO's open door to Ukraine was dumb and yet invading wasn't a legit security move by Russia.
0
0
1
@BH_Friedman
Ben Friedman
12 days
And regardless of whether they proceed with the freeze they, especially OMB nominee Russ Vought, openly argue that they can violate the impoundment act and not spend allocated funds. No one should do a victory lap on protecting the power of the purse.
@metzgov
bryan metzger
12 days
Sen. Chris Murphy (D-CT) taking the same tack, saying that the “crisis might have just deepened.” “By getting rid of the memo, they believe, they possibly believe, that they can still move forward with the funding freeze.”
0
1
2
@BH_Friedman
Ben Friedman
13 days
Trump is attempting to destroy the congressional spending power in the Constitution. Legislators and god forbid justices who go along with that cannot pretend to be constitutionalists.
0
2
2
@BH_Friedman
Ben Friedman
13 days
From a political standpoint, it's kind of wild they don't seem to have excluded DoD from this. Might that wake some part of the GOP up to notice their spending power being stolen?
0
0
4
@BH_Friedman
Ben Friedman
18 days
Funny that Trump wants everyone in the federal government back to working in the office except the NSC officials who can only work from the office.
@John_Hudson
John Hudson
19 days
National security adviser Mike Waltz sent home dozens of NSC career officials today as a part of a “full review” aimed at ensuring NSC personnel “are committed to implementing President Trump’s America First agenda." W/ @nakashimae. Confirming AP's story
0
5
8