![Nora Ammann Profile](https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/1330876431480614916/E_jY9Zwr_x96.jpg)
Nora Ammann
@AmmannNora
Followers
743
Following
3K
Statuses
1K
Technical Specialist - Safeguarded AI - ARIA https://t.co/aIwOFs2jv7 Co-founder, ex-Director & Board at https://t.co/GphUSABGT9 My views are my own ✨🤖🧠
Joined November 2020
RT @HaydnBelfield: The middle ground is arms control Most previous dual-use tech like nuclear or biological research/weapons have had peop…
0
2
0
RT @apolloaisafety: Can you tell when an LLM is lying by looking at its activations? Are simple methods good enough? We recently investig…
0
21
0
RT @MaxNadeau_: 🧵 Announcing @open_phil's Technical AI Safety RFP! We're seeking proposals across 21 research areas to help make AI system…
0
79
0
RT @mmitchell_ai: New piece out! We explain why Fully Autonomous Agents Should Not be Developed, breaking “AI Agent” down into its componen…
0
137
0
@littIeramblings @pivotal_org Happy to accept as an assumption in this context that this would be a national project. nevertheless, being able to verify to third parties (allies and competitors) certain, potentially pretty basic claims / 'red lines'
1
0
3
@OrionJohnston @DavidDuvenaud @jankulveit @raymondadouglas @degerturann @DavidSKrueger 3. As a result, these social systems themselves will increasingly fail to produce human-friendly outcomes (in particular, making sure humans are doing well)
1
0
2
Really pleased this paper is out! While I'm worried about loss of control risks, I'm also worried about the systemic disempowerment risks we talk about in this paper. This is a space is really ripe for more work, and for thinking hard about solutions!!
New paper: What happens once AIs make humans obsolete? Even without AIs seeking power, we argue that competitive pressures will fully erode human influence and values. with @jankulveit @raymondadouglas @AmmannNora @degerturann @DavidSKrueger 🧵
1
1
34
@tyler_m_john @NPCollapse And in the specific context above, I have at least not seen a compelling case that it is not. And IMO the burden of proof here _very much_ lays on the opposite party.
1
0
2