@OfSymbols @PommyPops @Ali3Mctavish @1984_broken @GordonBrown @Conservatives Well there was no money when Brown left at a time when globally there were big financial issues.

@TheAthletesCor1 Stun ?? Man U not scored v #cpfc in last 4 games, so not a stun really. And Ten Hag ... are you sure about that

@Shashank_472 @cricketontnt @tntsports @discoveryplusUK And your actual point is what?

@Littu85 @cricketontnt @tntsports @discoveryplusUK Still cheating?

@Mrgokukakarot Which ppl? Indian fans by any chance. I don't know the specifics of that example so wont comment. But if all rounder Root was replaced by all rounder Jordon after the former had batted, then I bet you'd be a little annoyed by that.

@ZavierUncle @KP24 @josbuttler All rounder maybe. But one is a batting all-rounder, i.e medium pace and the other a fast bowling all rounder. Hardly like of like. This undermines the Law. Put the other way around you'd scream Eng were cheating

@Sandeep42121507 @cricketontnt @tntsports @discoveryplusUK You got an unfair advantage and if India so good on their own track then you shouldn't need this. Let your cricket talk for itself.

@Sami169143 @cricketontnt @tntsports @discoveryplusUK Yes it is. Read the laws 1.2.7 then tell me you'd be happy if it happened to you. Eng lost and could have without this but now we will never know.

@cricdebasish @drtahir1988 @BasitSubhani He that much of a seam bowler he's been used something like 9 overs in 13. So not a front line bowler. Sorry but ref got it wrong and if India that good they shouldn't need this to win

@WithRamSay @PRcricketchat @MidnightMusinng You can try to justify but this was wrong. This is not about Harshit but about Dube where the law state ref to consider what role Duube would play. 9 overs in 13 matches suggests not front line bowler. Very simple match ref got it wrong.

@cricdebasish @drtahir1988 @BasitSubhani Not at that pace he is not

@cricdebasish @drtahir1988 @BasitSubhani Not based on recent T20I games. Their stats are not allrounder levels regardless of what domestic may show. Different ball game - literally

@sr_prabu62728 @MichaelVaughan This is T20I not domestic..... Literally a different ball game.

@vishvaksenudu @TheBarmyArmy But we are not in a 'Like-for-like' situation are we .....

@SrikarRebel8 @MichaelVaughan Then you dont know the Laws. Clause 1.2.7 says otherwise

@SinghPramod2784 @MichaelVaughan That does make it right. The Law (Clause 1.2.7) states Like-for-Like along with many other considerations. In short the Match Referee got it wrong

@SinghPramod2784 @tigersairam @MichaelVaughan 'For example, a batsman for a batsman, a bowler for a bowler, or an all-rounder for an all-rounder.'