50 meter från byggnaden
@50MFB
Followers
157
Following
2K
Statuses
9K
50 meter från byggnaden är en pod om och för vetenskap och en faktabaserad världsbild. Vårt främsta fokus är granskning av samhällspåverkande pseudovetenskap.
Stockholm, Sweden
Joined June 2020
Tack för ett trevligt inlägg. 1. Tänker du att nedlåtande ton är en bra strategi för samtal? 2. Ser inte att jag skrivit att algoritmerna är neutrala nu, inte heller att hat skall förstärkas. Tänker att du kanske skall läsa igen. 3. Hat är en term med väldigt subjektivt och oprecist begrepp — jag t.ex. hatar pedofili, men har också använt termen ”hatar” om Håkan Hällströms musik. Tänker att jag ser en hel del inlägg av dig som tycks hatiska. Vad är hat, och är allt hat lika enligt din måttstock?
0
0
1
@ars_gravitatis Hm, blir osäker tänker du att det bara är ryssar man mördat (utan rättegång) i enlighet med sin manual? Skulle det — om det nu bara var ryssar man mördat — bli moraliskt rätt och demokratiskt korrekt?
0
0
0
Ja, nådigherrn det är precis så jag menar… Eller, nej förresten. Jag blev inte övertygad av det du skriver. Ser inget försök till substantiell diskussion om det posten handlade. Endast laddade ord, eventuell felkarakterisering samt en, vad brukar du kalla det, ”konspirationsteori” utan presenterat underlag om ngt annat. Vi kan ju naturligtvis diskutera det med, men ska vi ta sakfrågan istället: Hur var det med Adam “I Have Seen Secret Evidence of Trump-Russia Collusion” Schiff och Russia gate? Det tycks mig, men jag kan ha fel, att trots att din usp är att anslå motståndare som lögnare, förrädare etc. är det inte sanningen du är ute efter utan snarare att slå ned på misinformation definierat helt efter GDIs styrdokument: ”adversarial narratives” — information som går mot det narrativ man vill förmedla för att det stödjer det mål man vill uppnå.
0
0
0
“Our first amendment stands as major block to be able to hammer [disinfomration] out if existence.” Said the man with a ✈️… Global Disinformation Index (🇺🇸, 🇪🇺, 🇬🇧 funded organisation.) definition (the only truly operationizable one): Disinformation = adversarial narratives = information, regardless of truth, that pose a threat to the preferred narrative. True information poses the biggest threat.
John Kerry - a man with a private plan(e). ✈️ "Our First Amendment stands as a major block to the ability to be able to hammer [‘disinformation’] out of existence.” Because it stands in the way “of building consensus” and makes it “really hard to govern today.”
0
0
0
RT @emilyakopp: The bureaucracy’s abuses are already subject to Congressional oversight. How effective is it? It took years to debar EcoHea…
0
53
0
RT @50MFB: @AgnesWold @visomkan Jag håller till stor del med Agnes. Min poäng var dock djupare än så. Det var därför inlägget var långt. G…
0
2
0
RT @GripJesper: @AgnesWold Det är tyvärr oerhört vanligt inom sam/hum-området med personer som tror att intervjuer med några fåtal personer…
0
2
0
0
5
0
Not least since it meddled in children’s natural development of speech and reading facial expressions… Horrid. Authoritarianism, built on the quicksand of false consensus. Can’t shake the question if it they told conscious non-truths, or if group think coupled with extreme fear made them sink into mass formation… or, perhaps a little of both. I mean the Fauci double masking seems to be signaling of virtue more than anything else… The WHO’s utter nonsense about covid being not airborne is one of the most jaring and harmful non-truths uttered during the pandemic.
0
0
0
Masking kids was exactly as noneffective as masking adults was. With the difference that it hindered their speech development and their ability to read fascial expressions. All for the common good of virtue signaling. Conscious non-truths for Science sake. But, did they tripple mask, or even double mask..?😷 😷 😷
In summer of 2021, we decided to follow 2 adjacent school districts in Fargo, ND adopting different mask policies: mandate vs none We found no sig difference in covid cases when they had different policies or the same Out w/@ProfNeerajSood, @ifihadastick & S. Heick in @RCJAPH
0
0
1
This is pure democracy at work... CIA murder (assassination) manual classified for over 40 years (declassified 1995), some highlights: Contrived assasinations - the most effective technique “For secret assassinations the contrived accidents are the most effective technique. When successfully ecevuted it causes little excitement and is only casually investigated. The most efficient contrived accident - a fall onto hard surface. “The most efficient accident is a fall of 75 feet or more onto a hard surface. Elevator shaft, stairwelles and unscreened windows will serve. Bridge falls into water is not reliable. In simple cases a private meeting with the subject may be arranged at a properly cased location. If the assassin immediately sets up an outcry playing a horrified witness no alibi or surreptitious withdrawal.” Chase cases - when you have to chase the victim. “In chase cases it will usually be necessary to stun or drug the subject before dropping him. Care is required to aspire that no wound or condition not attributed to the fall is discernible after death.” Falls into the sea or swiftly flowing “Falls into the sea or swiftly flowing rivers may suffice if the subject cannot swim. It will more reliable if the assassin can arrange to attempt rescue as he can thus be sure of the subjects death and at the same time establish a workable alibi.” Falls before trains or subway cars “Falls before trains or subway cars is usually effective but require exact timing and can seldom be free from unexpected observation.” Automobile accidents “Automobile accidents are a less satisfactory means of assassination. If the subject is deliberately runned down very exact timing is necessary and investigation is likely to be thorough. If the subject’s car is tampered with the reliability is very low. The subject may be stunned or drugged and then placed in the car, but this is only reliable when the car can be runned down a high cliff or into deep water without observation.” Arson “Arson can cause accidental death [sic] if the subject is drugged and left in a burning building. Reliability is not satisfactory unless the building is isolated and highly combustible.” Drugs “In all types of assassinations except terroristic drugs can be very effective. If the assassin is trained as a doctor or a nurse and the subject is under medical care, this is easy and rare method. An overdose of morfin administrated as a seditive will cause death without disturbance and is difficult to detect. The amount of the dose will depend upon weather the subject has been using narcotics regularly. If not, two grains will suffice. If the subject drinks heavely morfine or similar narcotics can be injected at the passing out stage, and the cause of death will often held to be acute alcoholism.”
Here I read the CIA assassination guide out loud: (from last night's subscriber stream)
0
2
1
The serenity of fighting… But not if you say you’re going to do it peacefully, then it clearly is heinous. [Protests is inherently democratic, and inherently kinda dangerous because the mob cannot be controlled. But it truly is a risk that needs to be taken. Be careful to use the same yardstick.]
0
2
2