zaza
@zaza
Followers
481
Following
6K
Statuses
635
RT @viennality: Get Ready For The Next Battle and UNLEASH THE BEAST with a €2000 POT BONUS for TEKKEN 8 powered by Monster Energy 🔥 only a…
0
7
0
RT @SuppressedNws: ⚡️🇮🇱JUST IN: An Israeli threw a cat from the roof of a 5-story building in Jerusalem. ⚠️TW A group of Israelis found a…
0
15K
0
RT @AyoRichie_98: Let’s talk about Bryan Qcb1 turning into ws1 vs high attacks (carry) Taunt heat smash (carry) Qcf1+2 safe (carry) F2,1,…
0
19
0
Thats not what they say brother. They say the chance of anything happening or anything being the way it is or any orher way, is close to 0% but not zero. In mathematics and in scienece there are no 100 or 0 percantages, even 0,00001% is not 0. And if you give the Universe an infinite number of tries to produce the constellation we have right now, (which is what they believe which is hard to prove but also disprove, just like the existence of a creator) even the case that only has a 0,00000001% chance of happening, at some point would take place. If you shrink down that concept into for example life forming on planets, you have, as far as we know, 99,9999% of all other planets in the universe without any sort of intelligent lifeform. So life forming and producing intelligent lifeforms is extremely unlikely, close to 0%. But if you have an infinite number of planets, the chance of life like ours forming is more propable than not. The close to zero % that they say is that concept. And no that doesnt mean that by their own admission there is a 99% chance of there being a creator, thats an error in your thinking. In reality its 50/50, no one knows, and anyone can believe anything….whatever man your, law sucks.
1
0
1
RT @Fergus_TK: Of ALL the final fantasy chars they put in arguably the WORST ff protagonist, I'm gonna scream Ff16 is so SHIT wtf, how and…
0
34
0
