![Thomas Bernhard Profile](https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/1585309392748027904/6VfWqfN2_x96.jpg)
Thomas Bernhard
@thom_bernhard
Followers
141
Following
170
Statuses
1K
@bsvsimp This is a smart move. Adding this to his profile will get him some attention so that he can more effectively promote BSV this week đź§
0
0
1
@Bitcrash4 He’s busy entering ChatGPT prompts to cheat his way through another worthless vanity “degree” or ten
0
0
6
@JoeSchlubb @gavinlucas110 Your ad hominem exposes your insecurities. If you could back up your opinion with facts you would have done that instead
0
0
0
@JoeSchlubb @gavinlucas110 You are truly a stupid dishonest person. Craig’s early involvement with Bitcoin was a “stipulated fact” in Kleiman. Meaning both sides assumed it was a fact, even though it was false. It was never an issue to be tried in that case. So your point is both nonsensical and dishonest.
1
0
1
@JoeSchlubb @gavinlucas110 Craig Wright has been proven to not be Satoshi. If you think that identifying people who talked about digital signatures in 2008 could somehow magically unmake that reality, you are mentally retarded. Reality is cruel sometimes.
1
0
0
@JoeSchlubb @gavinlucas110 No really, are you retarded? Because what you’re asking is something only a mentally challenged person would think is a good question
1
0
0
@JoeSchlubb @gavinlucas110 Craig is Satoshi because he wrote about electronic signatures? Are you fucking retarded?
1
0
1
@gavinlucas110 It’s interesting that the section on digital signatures in Craig’s 2008 book is plagiarised. As for why he was interested in basic IT security concepts, it’s because he was hoarding certificates (like GLEG Gold) to promote himself as the world’s most awarded IT security expert
@btcsteve Craig Wright––ahem, SATOSHI NAKAMOTO––on digital signatures, from his 2008 book. Satoshi must have simply forgot to cite Chris Reed...d'oh! Or maybe his editor removed the citation in the published version. Either way, can't be Craig's fault
1
0
5
@Deadbeat1000 @digitsu There is no authentic evidence from Kleiman v Wright that Craig invented Bitcoin. There is nothing to negate.
0
0
2
@mohrt @hlopez_ @CounterflyChick @derekm00r3 @cregmaxwell @ScotchHorse @ruidasilva @kurtwuckertjr @LightBSV @CsTominaga @FrankRundatz You can confirm on non-twitter sources.
0
0
1
@mohrt @CounterflyChick @derekm00r3 @cregmaxwell @ScotchHorse @ruidasilva @hlopez_ @kurtwuckertjr @LightBSV @CsTominaga @FrankRundatz Saying “Bitcoin is everything” is proof of complete lunacy and stupidity.
0
0
0
@mohrt @CounterflyChick @derekm00r3 @cregmaxwell @ScotchHorse @ruidasilva @hlopez_ @kurtwuckertjr @LightBSV @CsTominaga @FrankRundatz Stop lying. The “entirety of the stack” is not Turing complete. Bitcoin is not Turing complete, never has been, and never was meant to be. The programs you refer to require using external systems to loop, they do not run on Bitcoin by itself. Because Bitcoin is not TC.
0
0
0
@BSVAssn @WilliamShortss @SilkyFlows @PkO59B94XT2iNmC @Bitcrash4 Not they don’t. As with the Blackrock ETF they literally spelled it out and these BSV shills just ignored it. They’re lying on purpose.
0
0
3
@LeviDecker111 @saturn_drift @bielokamoto @CsTominaga In your imagination, sure. But not in real life.
0
0
0