Drake’s gonna be really mad if trump gets Canada after Kendrick just stole his soul on national television.

or maybe, we just don’t like sending money to wuhan and catching covid later, or paying al-qaeda to do regime change in the middle east, or pay farmers to grow opium poppies in afghanistan so we cab use heroin to subvert countries, or weaponize news agencies towards the american public, or lobby for censorship laws in europe in order to force our tech companies to censor us at home and do an end run around the first amendment, or, or, or

@michaelmalice the ones paid by USAID

Legal precedent for DOGE executive order 1. Constitutional Authority •Article II, Section 1 & Section 3 of the U.S. Constitution: Grants the President executive power and the duty to ensure laws are faithfully executed. The President has broad discretion to manage the executive branch, including establishing advisory and temporary bodies to improve government efficiency. •Executive Reorganization Authority: While the Reorganization Act of 1939 (5 U.S.C. §§ 901-912) previously gave the President explicit authority to restructure executive agencies, its provisions requiring congressional approval have lapsed. However, the President retains inherent executive authority to reorganize administrative functions within existing agencies. 2. Statutory Authority •Title 5, U.S. Code – Government Organization & Employees •5 U.S.C. § 301: Authorizes executive departments to issue rules and orders related to their internal organization. •5 U.S.C. § 3161: Allows the President to establish temporary organizations to carry out specialized government functions, including modernization initiatives like the U.S. DOGE Service Temporary Organization. •5 U.S.C. § 551: Defines “agency” for the purposes of administrative law, providing the framework under which agencies comply with executive orders. •Title 40, U.S. Code – Information Technology Management •40 U.S.C. § 11315: Empowers the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) to oversee IT policy, which aligns with the executive order’s goal of technology modernization. •The E-Government Act of 2002 (44 U.S.C. § 3501 et seq.): Directs federal agencies to modernize IT infrastructure and improve electronic government services. •Federal Property and Administrative Services Act (40 U.S.C. §§ 101-126) •Provides the legal basis for improving the efficiency of federal operations, including technology modernization efforts. 3. Precedents from Past Executive Orders •Executive Order 13794 (2017) – Reorganization of the Executive Branch: Directed federal agencies to streamline their functions and improve efficiency. •Executive Order 13833 (2018) – Enhancing the Effectiveness of Agency Chief Information Officers: Strengthened the role of CIOs in government-wide IT modernization efforts. •Executive Order 14058 (2021) – Transforming Federal Customer Experience and Service Delivery: Ordered agencies to improve federal IT and customer experience. •Executive Order 13642 (2013) – Making Open and Machine-Readable Data the Default for Government Information: Set a precedent for inter-agency data interoperability, which aligns with this order’s directive on software modernization. 4. Budgetary and Administrative Constraints •31 U.S.C. § 1341 (Anti-Deficiency Act): Ensures that any new initiative is implemented subject to available appropriations, as stated in Section 5(b) of the order. •OMB Circular A-11 & Federal Acquisition Regulations (FAR): Govern how agencies can implement IT modernization within their budgets.

Legal precedent for DOGE executive order 1. Constitutional Authority •Article II, Section 1 & Section 3 of the U.S. Constitution: Grants the President executive power and the duty to ensure laws are faithfully executed. The President has broad discretion to manage the executive branch, including establishing advisory and temporary bodies to improve government efficiency. •Executive Reorganization Authority: While the Reorganization Act of 1939 (5 U.S.C. §§ 901-912) previously gave the President explicit authority to restructure executive agencies, its provisions requiring congressional approval have lapsed. However, the President retains inherent executive authority to reorganize administrative functions within existing agencies. 2. Statutory Authority •Title 5, U.S. Code – Government Organization & Employees •5 U.S.C. § 301: Authorizes executive departments to issue rules and orders related to their internal organization. •5 U.S.C. § 3161: Allows the President to establish temporary organizations to carry out specialized government functions, including modernization initiatives like the U.S. DOGE Service Temporary Organization. •5 U.S.C. § 551: Defines “agency” for the purposes of administrative law, providing the framework under which agencies comply with executive orders. •Title 40, U.S. Code – Information Technology Management •40 U.S.C. § 11315: Empowers the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) to oversee IT policy, which aligns with the executive order’s goal of technology modernization. •The E-Government Act of 2002 (44 U.S.C. § 3501 et seq.): Directs federal agencies to modernize IT infrastructure and improve electronic government services. •Federal Property and Administrative Services Act (40 U.S.C. §§ 101-126) •Provides the legal basis for improving the efficiency of federal operations, including technology modernization efforts. 3. Precedents from Past Executive Orders •Executive Order 13794 (2017) – Reorganization of the Executive Branch: Directed federal agencies to streamline their functions and improve efficiency. •Executive Order 13833 (2018) – Enhancing the Effectiveness of Agency Chief Information Officers: Strengthened the role of CIOs in government-wide IT modernization efforts. •Executive Order 14058 (2021) – Transforming Federal Customer Experience and Service Delivery: Ordered agencies to improve federal IT and customer experience. •Executive Order 13642 (2013) – Making Open and Machine-Readable Data the Default for Government Information: Set a precedent for inter-agency data interoperability, which aligns with this order’s directive on software modernization. 4. Budgetary and Administrative Constraints •31 U.S.C. § 1341 (Anti-Deficiency Act): Ensures that any new initiative is implemented subject to available appropriations, as stated in Section 5(b) of the order. •OMB Circular A-11 & Federal Acquisition Regulations (FAR): Govern how agencies can implement IT modernization within their budgets.

@Austen12341 youre welcome 🤗 thank you for reading it.

@BendingBirches2 @King_Will_Power @DisavowTrump20 I never said that there is no judicial review authority. I literally just said that there is infact the right to judicial review. And i gave my opinion on how i personally see the order. And i also stated that im all for letting the judicial review play out.

Legal precedent for DOGE executive order 1. Constitutional Authority •Article II, Section 1 & Section 3 of the U.S. Constitution: Grants the President executive power and the duty to ensure laws are faithfully executed. The President has broad discretion to manage the executive branch, including establishing advisory and temporary bodies to improve government efficiency. •Executive Reorganization Authority: While the Reorganization Act of 1939 (5 U.S.C. §§ 901-912) previously gave the President explicit authority to restructure executive agencies, its provisions requiring congressional approval have lapsed. However, the President retains inherent executive authority to reorganize administrative functions within existing agencies. 2. Statutory Authority •Title 5, U.S. Code – Government Organization & Employees •5 U.S.C. § 301: Authorizes executive departments to issue rules and orders related to their internal organization. •5 U.S.C. § 3161: Allows the President to establish temporary organizations to carry out specialized government functions, including modernization initiatives like the U.S. DOGE Service Temporary Organization. •5 U.S.C. § 551: Defines “agency” for the purposes of administrative law, providing the framework under which agencies comply with executive orders. •Title 40, U.S. Code – Information Technology Management •40 U.S.C. § 11315: Empowers the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) to oversee IT policy, which aligns with the executive order’s goal of technology modernization. •The E-Government Act of 2002 (44 U.S.C. § 3501 et seq.): Directs federal agencies to modernize IT infrastructure and improve electronic government services. •Federal Property and Administrative Services Act (40 U.S.C. §§ 101-126) •Provides the legal basis for improving the efficiency of federal operations, including technology modernization efforts. 3. Precedents from Past Executive Orders •Executive Order 13794 (2017) – Reorganization of the Executive Branch: Directed federal agencies to streamline their functions and improve efficiency. •Executive Order 13833 (2018) – Enhancing the Effectiveness of Agency Chief Information Officers: Strengthened the role of CIOs in government-wide IT modernization efforts. •Executive Order 14058 (2021) – Transforming Federal Customer Experience and Service Delivery: Ordered agencies to improve federal IT and customer experience. •Executive Order 13642 (2013) – Making Open and Machine-Readable Data the Default for Government Information: Set a precedent for inter-agency data interoperability, which aligns with this order’s directive on software modernization. 4. Budgetary and Administrative Constraints •31 U.S.C. § 1341 (Anti-Deficiency Act): Ensures that any new initiative is implemented subject to available appropriations, as stated in Section 5(b) of the order. •OMB Circular A-11 & Federal Acquisition Regulations (FAR): Govern how agencies can implement IT modernization within their budgets.

@BendingBirches2 @King_Will_Power @DisavowTrump20 not arguing that. Im all for the law working and it playing out. Still going to put the information out there.

Legal precedent for DOGE executive order 1. Constitutional Authority •Article II, Section 1 & Section 3 of the U.S. Constitution: Grants the President executive power and the duty to ensure laws are faithfully executed. The President has broad discretion to manage the executive branch, including establishing advisory and temporary bodies to improve government efficiency. •Executive Reorganization Authority: While the Reorganization Act of 1939 (5 U.S.C. §§ 901-912) previously gave the President explicit authority to restructure executive agencies, its provisions requiring congressional approval have lapsed. However, the President retains inherent executive authority to reorganize administrative functions within existing agencies. 2. Statutory Authority •Title 5, U.S. Code – Government Organization & Employees •5 U.S.C. § 301: Authorizes executive departments to issue rules and orders related to their internal organization. •5 U.S.C. § 3161: Allows the President to establish temporary organizations to carry out specialized government functions, including modernization initiatives like the U.S. DOGE Service Temporary Organization. •5 U.S.C. § 551: Defines “agency” for the purposes of administrative law, providing the framework under which agencies comply with executive orders. •Title 40, U.S. Code – Information Technology Management •40 U.S.C. § 11315: Empowers the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) to oversee IT policy, which aligns with the executive order’s goal of technology modernization. •The E-Government Act of 2002 (44 U.S.C. § 3501 et seq.): Directs federal agencies to modernize IT infrastructure and improve electronic government services. •Federal Property and Administrative Services Act (40 U.S.C. §§ 101-126) •Provides the legal basis for improving the efficiency of federal operations, including technology modernization efforts. 3. Precedents from Past Executive Orders •Executive Order 13794 (2017) – Reorganization of the Executive Branch: Directed federal agencies to streamline their functions and improve efficiency. •Executive Order 13833 (2018) – Enhancing the Effectiveness of Agency Chief Information Officers: Strengthened the role of CIOs in government-wide IT modernization efforts. •Executive Order 14058 (2021) – Transforming Federal Customer Experience and Service Delivery: Ordered agencies to improve federal IT and customer experience. •Executive Order 13642 (2013) – Making Open and Machine-Readable Data the Default for Government Information: Set a precedent for inter-agency data interoperability, which aligns with this order’s directive on software modernization. 4. Budgetary and Administrative Constraints •31 U.S.C. § 1341 (Anti-Deficiency Act): Ensures that any new initiative is implemented subject to available appropriations, as stated in Section 5(b) of the order. •OMB Circular A-11 & Federal Acquisition Regulations (FAR): Govern how agencies can implement IT modernization within their budgets.

Legal precedent for DOGE executive order 1. Constitutional Authority •Article II, Section 1 & Section 3 of the U.S. Constitution: Grants the President executive power and the duty to ensure laws are faithfully executed. The President has broad discretion to manage the executive branch, including establishing advisory and temporary bodies to improve government efficiency. •Executive Reorganization Authority: While the Reorganization Act of 1939 (5 U.S.C. §§ 901-912) previously gave the President explicit authority to restructure executive agencies, its provisions requiring congressional approval have lapsed. However, the President retains inherent executive authority to reorganize administrative functions within existing agencies. 2. Statutory Authority •Title 5, U.S. Code – Government Organization & Employees •5 U.S.C. § 301: Authorizes executive departments to issue rules and orders related to their internal organization. •5 U.S.C. § 3161: Allows the President to establish temporary organizations to carry out specialized government functions, including modernization initiatives like the U.S. DOGE Service Temporary Organization. •5 U.S.C. § 551: Defines “agency” for the purposes of administrative law, providing the framework under which agencies comply with executive orders. •Title 40, U.S. Code – Information Technology Management •40 U.S.C. § 11315: Empowers the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) to oversee IT policy, which aligns with the executive order’s goal of technology modernization. •The E-Government Act of 2002 (44 U.S.C. § 3501 et seq.): Directs federal agencies to modernize IT infrastructure and improve electronic government services. •Federal Property and Administrative Services Act (40 U.S.C. §§ 101-126) •Provides the legal basis for improving the efficiency of federal operations, including technology modernization efforts. 3. Precedents from Past Executive Orders •Executive Order 13794 (2017) – Reorganization of the Executive Branch: Directed federal agencies to streamline their functions and improve efficiency. •Executive Order 13833 (2018) – Enhancing the Effectiveness of Agency Chief Information Officers: Strengthened the role of CIOs in government-wide IT modernization efforts. •Executive Order 14058 (2021) – Transforming Federal Customer Experience and Service Delivery: Ordered agencies to improve federal IT and customer experience. •Executive Order 13642 (2013) – Making Open and Machine-Readable Data the Default for Government Information: Set a precedent for inter-agency data interoperability, which aligns with this order’s directive on software modernization. 4. Budgetary and Administrative Constraints •31 U.S.C. § 1341 (Anti-Deficiency Act): Ensures that any new initiative is implemented subject to available appropriations, as stated in Section 5(b) of the order. •OMB Circular A-11 & Federal Acquisition Regulations (FAR): Govern how agencies can implement IT modernization within their budgets.

Legal precedent for DOGE executive order 1. Constitutional Authority •Article II, Section 1 & Section 3 of the U.S. Constitution: Grants the President executive power and the duty to ensure laws are faithfully executed. The President has broad discretion to manage the executive branch, including establishing advisory and temporary bodies to improve government efficiency. •Executive Reorganization Authority: While the Reorganization Act of 1939 (5 U.S.C. §§ 901-912) previously gave the President explicit authority to restructure executive agencies, its provisions requiring congressional approval have lapsed. However, the President retains inherent executive authority to reorganize administrative functions within existing agencies. 2. Statutory Authority •Title 5, U.S. Code – Government Organization & Employees •5 U.S.C. § 301: Authorizes executive departments to issue rules and orders related to their internal organization. •5 U.S.C. § 3161: Allows the President to establish temporary organizations to carry out specialized government functions, including modernization initiatives like the U.S. DOGE Service Temporary Organization. •5 U.S.C. § 551: Defines “agency” for the purposes of administrative law, providing the framework under which agencies comply with executive orders. •Title 40, U.S. Code – Information Technology Management •40 U.S.C. § 11315: Empowers the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) to oversee IT policy, which aligns with the executive order’s goal of technology modernization. •The E-Government Act of 2002 (44 U.S.C. § 3501 et seq.): Directs federal agencies to modernize IT infrastructure and improve electronic government services. •Federal Property and Administrative Services Act (40 U.S.C. §§ 101-126) •Provides the legal basis for improving the efficiency of federal operations, including technology modernization efforts. 3. Precedents from Past Executive Orders •Executive Order 13794 (2017) – Reorganization of the Executive Branch: Directed federal agencies to streamline their functions and improve efficiency. •Executive Order 13833 (2018) – Enhancing the Effectiveness of Agency Chief Information Officers: Strengthened the role of CIOs in government-wide IT modernization efforts. •Executive Order 14058 (2021) – Transforming Federal Customer Experience and Service Delivery: Ordered agencies to improve federal IT and customer experience. •Executive Order 13642 (2013) – Making Open and Machine-Readable Data the Default for Government Information: Set a precedent for inter-agency data interoperability, which aligns with this order’s directive on software modernization. 4. Budgetary and Administrative Constraints •31 U.S.C. § 1341 (Anti-Deficiency Act): Ensures that any new initiative is implemented subject to available appropriations, as stated in Section 5(b) of the order. •OMB Circular A-11 & Federal Acquisition Regulations (FAR): Govern how agencies can implement IT modernization within their budgets.

Legal precedent for DOGE executive order 1. Constitutional Authority •Article II, Section 1 & Section 3 of the U.S. Constitution: Grants the President executive power and the duty to ensure laws are faithfully executed. The President has broad discretion to manage the executive branch, including establishing advisory and temporary bodies to improve government efficiency. •Executive Reorganization Authority: While the Reorganization Act of 1939 (5 U.S.C. §§ 901-912) previously gave the President explicit authority to restructure executive agencies, its provisions requiring congressional approval have lapsed. However, the President retains inherent executive authority to reorganize administrative functions within existing agencies. 2. Statutory Authority •Title 5, U.S. Code – Government Organization & Employees •5 U.S.C. § 301: Authorizes executive departments to issue rules and orders related to their internal organization. •5 U.S.C. § 3161: Allows the President to establish temporary organizations to carry out specialized government functions, including modernization initiatives like the U.S. DOGE Service Temporary Organization. •5 U.S.C. § 551: Defines “agency” for the purposes of administrative law, providing the framework under which agencies comply with executive orders. •Title 40, U.S. Code – Information Technology Management •40 U.S.C. § 11315: Empowers the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) to oversee IT policy, which aligns with the executive order’s goal of technology modernization. •The E-Government Act of 2002 (44 U.S.C. § 3501 et seq.): Directs federal agencies to modernize IT infrastructure and improve electronic government services. •Federal Property and Administrative Services Act (40 U.S.C. §§ 101-126) •Provides the legal basis for improving the efficiency of federal operations, including technology modernization efforts. 3. Precedents from Past Executive Orders •Executive Order 13794 (2017) – Reorganization of the Executive Branch: Directed federal agencies to streamline their functions and improve efficiency. •Executive Order 13833 (2018) – Enhancing the Effectiveness of Agency Chief Information Officers: Strengthened the role of CIOs in government-wide IT modernization efforts. •Executive Order 14058 (2021) – Transforming Federal Customer Experience and Service Delivery: Ordered agencies to improve federal IT and customer experience. •Executive Order 13642 (2013) – Making Open and Machine-Readable Data the Default for Government Information: Set a precedent for inter-agency data interoperability, which aligns with this order’s directive on software modernization. 4. Budgetary and Administrative Constraints •31 U.S.C. § 1341 (Anti-Deficiency Act): Ensures that any new initiative is implemented subject to available appropriations, as stated in Section 5(b) of the order. •OMB Circular A-11 & Federal Acquisition Regulations (FAR): Govern how agencies can implement IT modernization within their budgets.

Legal precedent for DOGE executive order 1. Constitutional Authority •Article II, Section 1 & Section 3 of the U.S. Constitution: Grants the President executive power and the duty to ensure laws are faithfully executed. The President has broad discretion to manage the executive branch, including establishing advisory and temporary bodies to improve government efficiency. •Executive Reorganization Authority: While the Reorganization Act of 1939 (5 U.S.C. §§ 901-912) previously gave the President explicit authority to restructure executive agencies, its provisions requiring congressional approval have lapsed. However, the President retains inherent executive authority to reorganize administrative functions within existing agencies. 2. Statutory Authority •Title 5, U.S. Code – Government Organization & Employees •5 U.S.C. § 301: Authorizes executive departments to issue rules and orders related to their internal organization. •5 U.S.C. § 3161: Allows the President to establish temporary organizations to carry out specialized government functions, including modernization initiatives like the U.S. DOGE Service Temporary Organization. •5 U.S.C. § 551: Defines “agency” for the purposes of administrative law, providing the framework under which agencies comply with executive orders. •Title 40, U.S. Code – Information Technology Management •40 U.S.C. § 11315: Empowers the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) to oversee IT policy, which aligns with the executive order’s goal of technology modernization. •The E-Government Act of 2002 (44 U.S.C. § 3501 et seq.): Directs federal agencies to modernize IT infrastructure and improve electronic government services. •Federal Property and Administrative Services Act (40 U.S.C. §§ 101-126) •Provides the legal basis for improving the efficiency of federal operations, including technology modernization efforts. 3. Precedents from Past Executive Orders •Executive Order 13794 (2017) – Reorganization of the Executive Branch: Directed federal agencies to streamline their functions and improve efficiency. •Executive Order 13833 (2018) – Enhancing the Effectiveness of Agency Chief Information Officers: Strengthened the role of CIOs in government-wide IT modernization efforts. •Executive Order 14058 (2021) – Transforming Federal Customer Experience and Service Delivery: Ordered agencies to improve federal IT and customer experience. •Executive Order 13642 (2013) – Making Open and Machine-Readable Data the Default for Government Information: Set a precedent for inter-agency data interoperability, which aligns with this order’s directive on software modernization. 4. Budgetary and Administrative Constraints •31 U.S.C. § 1341 (Anti-Deficiency Act): Ensures that any new initiative is implemented subject to available appropriations, as stated in Section 5(b) of the order. •OMB Circular A-11 & Federal Acquisition Regulations (FAR): Govern how agencies can implement IT modernization within their budgets.

Legal precedent for DOGE executive order 1. Constitutional Authority •Article II, Section 1 & Section 3 of the U.S. Constitution: Grants the President executive power and the duty to ensure laws are faithfully executed. The President has broad discretion to manage the executive branch, including establishing advisory and temporary bodies to improve government efficiency. •Executive Reorganization Authority: While the Reorganization Act of 1939 (5 U.S.C. §§ 901-912) previously gave the President explicit authority to restructure executive agencies, its provisions requiring congressional approval have lapsed. However, the President retains inherent executive authority to reorganize administrative functions within existing agencies. 2. Statutory Authority •Title 5, U.S. Code – Government Organization & Employees •5 U.S.C. § 301: Authorizes executive departments to issue rules and orders related to their internal organization. •5 U.S.C. § 3161: Allows the President to establish temporary organizations to carry out specialized government functions, including modernization initiatives like the U.S. DOGE Service Temporary Organization. •5 U.S.C. § 551: Defines “agency” for the purposes of administrative law, providing the framework under which agencies comply with executive orders. •Title 40, U.S. Code – Information Technology Management •40 U.S.C. § 11315: Empowers the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) to oversee IT policy, which aligns with the executive order’s goal of technology modernization. •The E-Government Act of 2002 (44 U.S.C. § 3501 et seq.): Directs federal agencies to modernize IT infrastructure and improve electronic government services. •Federal Property and Administrative Services Act (40 U.S.C. §§ 101-126) •Provides the legal basis for improving the efficiency of federal operations, including technology modernization efforts. 3. Precedents from Past Executive Orders •Executive Order 13794 (2017) – Reorganization of the Executive Branch: Directed federal agencies to streamline their functions and improve efficiency. •Executive Order 13833 (2018) – Enhancing the Effectiveness of Agency Chief Information Officers: Strengthened the role of CIOs in government-wide IT modernization efforts. •Executive Order 14058 (2021) – Transforming Federal Customer Experience and Service Delivery: Ordered agencies to improve federal IT and customer experience. •Executive Order 13642 (2013) – Making Open and Machine-Readable Data the Default for Government Information: Set a precedent for inter-agency data interoperability, which aligns with this order’s directive on software modernization. 4. Budgetary and Administrative Constraints •31 U.S.C. § 1341 (Anti-Deficiency Act): Ensures that any new initiative is implemented subject to available appropriations, as stated in Section 5(b) of the order. •OMB Circular A-11 & Federal Acquisition Regulations (FAR): Govern how agencies can implement IT modernization within their budgets.

Im just posting the legal precedent because people trying to frame what DOGE is doing and the executive order as unconstitutional. And it clearly isn’t. There’s plenty of precedent. The judiciary does in fact have the right to judicial review. However, in my opinion precedent would seem to suggest that the order given by the judge is constitutionally grey. Where as there is plenty of precedent in support for the president having DOGE doing what they are doing.

Legal precedent for DOGE executive order 1. Constitutional Authority •Article II, Section 1 & Section 3 of the U.S. Constitution: Grants the President executive power and the duty to ensure laws are faithfully executed. The President has broad discretion to manage the executive branch, including establishing advisory and temporary bodies to improve government efficiency. •Executive Reorganization Authority: While the Reorganization Act of 1939 (5 U.S.C. §§ 901-912) previously gave the President explicit authority to restructure executive agencies, its provisions requiring congressional approval have lapsed. However, the President retains inherent executive authority to reorganize administrative functions within existing agencies. 2. Statutory Authority •Title 5, U.S. Code – Government Organization & Employees •5 U.S.C. § 301: Authorizes executive departments to issue rules and orders related to their internal organization. •5 U.S.C. § 3161: Allows the President to establish temporary organizations to carry out specialized government functions, including modernization initiatives like the U.S. DOGE Service Temporary Organization. •5 U.S.C. § 551: Defines “agency” for the purposes of administrative law, providing the framework under which agencies comply with executive orders. •Title 40, U.S. Code – Information Technology Management •40 U.S.C. § 11315: Empowers the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) to oversee IT policy, which aligns with the executive order’s goal of technology modernization. •The E-Government Act of 2002 (44 U.S.C. § 3501 et seq.): Directs federal agencies to modernize IT infrastructure and improve electronic government services. •Federal Property and Administrative Services Act (40 U.S.C. §§ 101-126) •Provides the legal basis for improving the efficiency of federal operations, including technology modernization efforts. 3. Precedents from Past Executive Orders •Executive Order 13794 (2017) – Reorganization of the Executive Branch: Directed federal agencies to streamline their functions and improve efficiency. •Executive Order 13833 (2018) – Enhancing the Effectiveness of Agency Chief Information Officers: Strengthened the role of CIOs in government-wide IT modernization efforts. •Executive Order 14058 (2021) – Transforming Federal Customer Experience and Service Delivery: Ordered agencies to improve federal IT and customer experience. •Executive Order 13642 (2013) – Making Open and Machine-Readable Data the Default for Government Information: Set a precedent for inter-agency data interoperability, which aligns with this order’s directive on software modernization. 4. Budgetary and Administrative Constraints •31 U.S.C. § 1341 (Anti-Deficiency Act): Ensures that any new initiative is implemented subject to available appropriations, as stated in Section 5(b) of the order. •OMB Circular A-11 & Federal Acquisition Regulations (FAR): Govern how agencies can implement IT modernization within their budgets.

Legal precedent for DOGE executive order 1. Constitutional Authority •Article II, Section 1 & Section 3 of the U.S. Constitution: Grants the President executive power and the duty to ensure laws are faithfully executed. The President has broad discretion to manage the executive branch, including establishing advisory and temporary bodies to improve government efficiency. •Executive Reorganization Authority: While the Reorganization Act of 1939 (5 U.S.C. §§ 901-912) previously gave the President explicit authority to restructure executive agencies, its provisions requiring congressional approval have lapsed. However, the President retains inherent executive authority to reorganize administrative functions within existing agencies. 2. Statutory Authority •Title 5, U.S. Code – Government Organization & Employees •5 U.S.C. § 301: Authorizes executive departments to issue rules and orders related to their internal organization. •5 U.S.C. § 3161: Allows the President to establish temporary organizations to carry out specialized government functions, including modernization initiatives like the U.S. DOGE Service Temporary Organization. •5 U.S.C. § 551: Defines “agency” for the purposes of administrative law, providing the framework under which agencies comply with executive orders. •Title 40, U.S. Code – Information Technology Management •40 U.S.C. § 11315: Empowers the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) to oversee IT policy, which aligns with the executive order’s goal of technology modernization. •The E-Government Act of 2002 (44 U.S.C. § 3501 et seq.): Directs federal agencies to modernize IT infrastructure and improve electronic government services. •Federal Property and Administrative Services Act (40 U.S.C. §§ 101-126) •Provides the legal basis for improving the efficiency of federal operations, including technology modernization efforts. 3. Precedents from Past Executive Orders •Executive Order 13794 (2017) – Reorganization of the Executive Branch: Directed federal agencies to streamline their functions and improve efficiency. •Executive Order 13833 (2018) – Enhancing the Effectiveness of Agency Chief Information Officers: Strengthened the role of CIOs in government-wide IT modernization efforts. •Executive Order 14058 (2021) – Transforming Federal Customer Experience and Service Delivery: Ordered agencies to improve federal IT and customer experience. •Executive Order 13642 (2013) – Making Open and Machine-Readable Data the Default for Government Information: Set a precedent for inter-agency data interoperability, which aligns with this order’s directive on software modernization. 4. Budgetary and Administrative Constraints •31 U.S.C. § 1341 (Anti-Deficiency Act): Ensures that any new initiative is implemented subject to available appropriations, as stated in Section 5(b) of the order. •OMB Circular A-11 & Federal Acquisition Regulations (FAR): Govern how agencies can implement IT modernization within their budgets.

Legal precedent for DOGE executive order 1. Constitutional Authority •Article II, Section 1 & Section 3 of the U.S. Constitution: Grants the President executive power and the duty to ensure laws are faithfully executed. The President has broad discretion to manage the executive branch, including establishing advisory and temporary bodies to improve government efficiency. •Executive Reorganization Authority: While the Reorganization Act of 1939 (5 U.S.C. §§ 901-912) previously gave the President explicit authority to restructure executive agencies, its provisions requiring congressional approval have lapsed. However, the President retains inherent executive authority to reorganize administrative functions within existing agencies. 2. Statutory Authority •Title 5, U.S. Code – Government Organization & Employees •5 U.S.C. § 301: Authorizes executive departments to issue rules and orders related to their internal organization. •5 U.S.C. § 3161: Allows the President to establish temporary organizations to carry out specialized government functions, including modernization initiatives like the U.S. DOGE Service Temporary Organization. •5 U.S.C. § 551: Defines “agency” for the purposes of administrative law, providing the framework under which agencies comply with executive orders. •Title 40, U.S. Code – Information Technology Management •40 U.S.C. § 11315: Empowers the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) to oversee IT policy, which aligns with the executive order’s goal of technology modernization. •The E-Government Act of 2002 (44 U.S.C. § 3501 et seq.): Directs federal agencies to modernize IT infrastructure and improve electronic government services. •Federal Property and Administrative Services Act (40 U.S.C. §§ 101-126) •Provides the legal basis for improving the efficiency of federal operations, including technology modernization efforts. 3. Precedents from Past Executive Orders •Executive Order 13794 (2017) – Reorganization of the Executive Branch: Directed federal agencies to streamline their functions and improve efficiency. •Executive Order 13833 (2018) – Enhancing the Effectiveness of Agency Chief Information Officers: Strengthened the role of CIOs in government-wide IT modernization efforts. •Executive Order 14058 (2021) – Transforming Federal Customer Experience and Service Delivery: Ordered agencies to improve federal IT and customer experience. •Executive Order 13642 (2013) – Making Open and Machine-Readable Data the Default for Government Information: Set a precedent for inter-agency data interoperability, which aligns with this order’s directive on software modernization. 4. Budgetary and Administrative Constraints •31 U.S.C. § 1341 (Anti-Deficiency Act): Ensures that any new initiative is implemented subject to available appropriations, as stated in Section 5(b) of the order. •OMB Circular A-11 & Federal Acquisition Regulations (FAR): Govern how agencies can implement IT modernization within their budgets.

Legal precedent for DOGE executive order 1. Constitutional Authority •Article II, Section 1 & Section 3 of the U.S. Constitution: Grants the President executive power and the duty to ensure laws are faithfully executed. The President has broad discretion to manage the executive branch, including establishing advisory and temporary bodies to improve government efficiency. •Executive Reorganization Authority: While the Reorganization Act of 1939 (5 U.S.C. §§ 901-912) previously gave the President explicit authority to restructure executive agencies, its provisions requiring congressional approval have lapsed. However, the President retains inherent executive authority to reorganize administrative functions within existing agencies. 2. Statutory Authority •Title 5, U.S. Code – Government Organization & Employees •5 U.S.C. § 301: Authorizes executive departments to issue rules and orders related to their internal organization. •5 U.S.C. § 3161: Allows the President to establish temporary organizations to carry out specialized government functions, including modernization initiatives like the U.S. DOGE Service Temporary Organization. •5 U.S.C. § 551: Defines “agency” for the purposes of administrative law, providing the framework under which agencies comply with executive orders. •Title 40, U.S. Code – Information Technology Management •40 U.S.C. § 11315: Empowers the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) to oversee IT policy, which aligns with the executive order’s goal of technology modernization. •The E-Government Act of 2002 (44 U.S.C. § 3501 et seq.): Directs federal agencies to modernize IT infrastructure and improve electronic government services. •Federal Property and Administrative Services Act (40 U.S.C. §§ 101-126) •Provides the legal basis for improving the efficiency of federal operations, including technology modernization efforts. 3. Precedents from Past Executive Orders •Executive Order 13794 (2017) – Reorganization of the Executive Branch: Directed federal agencies to streamline their functions and improve efficiency. •Executive Order 13833 (2018) – Enhancing the Effectiveness of Agency Chief Information Officers: Strengthened the role of CIOs in government-wide IT modernization efforts. •Executive Order 14058 (2021) – Transforming Federal Customer Experience and Service Delivery: Ordered agencies to improve federal IT and customer experience. •Executive Order 13642 (2013) – Making Open and Machine-Readable Data the Default for Government Information: Set a precedent for inter-agency data interoperability, which aligns with this order’s directive on software modernization. 4. Budgetary and Administrative Constraints •31 U.S.C. § 1341 (Anti-Deficiency Act): Ensures that any new initiative is implemented subject to available appropriations, as stated in Section 5(b) of the order. •OMB Circular A-11 & Federal Acquisition Regulations (FAR): Govern how agencies can implement IT modernization within their budgets.