@Everything2Win
@Farid_0v
Well do you? Look at the Muslim world, not a single Islamic state. As much as you might give Islam lip service, when the opportunity comes to die for it most Muslims run.
@reesespuffs_ss
@p4nzo29
@pepatwink
keep talking they only want to silence us because it makes them insecure, in their heads no one would leave Islam unless they are evil lol
@Canis63
@Starmist_
The greatest threat to freedom are these low IQ tools who don't understand an attack on the freedom of people we don't like is also an attack on our own freedoms
@rozzaaaabd
@iAmBoredOfX
@nnnnnnxox
People have not gotten shorter over the last 1400 years, they've gotten taller. Your other comments aren't related to biology. There is no evidence women have gotten weaker or child birth has become more dangerous. It seems you are making things up to run away from the facts.
@PhDniX
@1Rebii
@freemonotheist
You're wasting your time, these guys are upset about your words while simultaneously wanting to kill apostates, wage war against non Muslims, enslave non Muslim women. They want to feel like victims, that's it.
@KevinMc50510877
@ShrekKeplr
@nadeinewrites
@ChumaAkuchie
All schools by default are secular. The question here isn't about accommodating religious practice, we are talking about actively preventing people in their free time from worship. State funded schools, shouldn't be free to discriminate against tax payers religions.
@ShrekKeplr
@nadeinewrites
@ChumaAkuchie
Im not sure if limiting freedom of religious expression due to some people wanting to force religious expression is a good example. Bit like prohibiting casual hookups cause some people rape others.
@AhmadKh43451601
@fahd_ibn_ala
@Simsimiyyah
Here is a question, why does no Muslim majority country rule by classical Islamic law? The answer is simple, most Muslims do not actually want it, they may pay lip service but they don't really accept it.
@abusillygoose
@moietroses
@RNDM144
Except there is no proof that khul is disliked for women except a weak hadith which mentions a woman asking for divorce for no reason (I'm paraphrasing). Not to mention a woman can issue divorce if it's stipulated in the marriage contract according to a minority of the jurists.
@mwhd1111
@SalafisLs
Ibn Abi Al-Izz is not authoritative on what Tahawi intended, Tahawis creed has a clear Maturidi slant (I know Maturidi comes after him), and this idea that God isn't in a place seems to be what he is pushing. He also negates the attributes having the same meaning as creation
@TabsiraArchives
Domestic violence would include the wife striking that the Quran calls to... So a pious Muslims can't be completely against domestic violence, just against severe domestic violence.
@wiscrible
You think it's feminist that a women requires a wali to marry? That she cannot divorce at will like a man? That she must have sex with her husband?
It gets boring after a bit. Iran has continually tried to not escalate, while Israel has tried continually to escalate. Everyone can see this, right? If we had a genuine genocidal invasion of Israel, sure intervene, but no need emboldening the arrogance of the Israeli government.
🇮🇷🇮🇱 UK, FRANCE, AND GERMANY WARN IRAN WILL ‘BEAR RESPONSIBILITY’ FOR ISRAEL ATTACK
UK PM Keir Starmer, Macron, and Scholz released the following joint statement:
“We are deeply concerned by the heightened tensions in the region and united in our commitment to de-escalation and
@KevinMc50510877
@ShrekKeplr
@nadeinewrites
@ChumaAkuchie
Secularism in Britain and America, unlike France, is the state not interfering in religion as opposed to trying to stamp out public displays of religion. This is a state funded school, funded by the tax payer, they shouldn't be free to impose their religious views.
@mwhd1111
@SalafisLs
مُحِيطٌ بِكُلِّ شَيْءٍ وَفَوْقَهُ وَقَدْ أَعْجَزَ عَنِ الْإِحَاطَةِ خَلْقَهُ
You assume Fawk cannot be used metaphorically. Also if you say the meaning is different from creation you render the word meaningless and agree with the Asharis in principle.
@keryslee
Its not even accurate. The case was not one of rape as in forced sex, the child consented but was underage (so statutory rape). Also not an immigrant. If there is a problem here, it is the discretion judges can legally use, get rid of the discretion and you'll have another issue.
@qoraxda
There's no real argument tho, the whole argument is "our times are different ignore what's in the books of fiqh, be nice to girls". Intellectually, if anyone is misconstruing Islam it's these guys, more so than the "incels".
@AlMansuri1995
@IbnalIskandar
@AshariSomali
Don't you find it a bit funny that when the salaf condemn kalam you insist it's a different kalam to that of the Ash'aris but when you just see the word in a slightly neutral manner you think it's what you guys engage in?
@birdhonks
Technically speaking if he has taken them as part of a group under a commander, they must be distributed prior to sex, and he must wait for her to menstruate. But yeah in principle once ownership is established he can forcefully have sex with her.
@gravityguide
@surfing_mujahid
@DillyHussain88
Most religions aren't compatible with secularism, not sure why you have a specific problem with Islam. The simple truth is, you're upset that your culture is dying out, not due to force, but due to your own failure.
@Simsimiyyah
This is the modern world, women want to be equals and will reinterpret Islam to that end. There's really nothing you can do about it, well except if you act like the Taliban.
@itsdzulqarnain
@zaudzarosh
They do tawil of the attributes and deny Allah is physically above His throne, they believe Allah exists without a place. I think nawawi makes takfir on those who affirm a place for Allah.
@rozzaaaabd
@iAmBoredOfX
@nnnnnnxox
So you claim God sent Muhammad as the Prophet for all people and Muhammad just did things cause they were normal in his time? You can't have it both ways either you accept Muhammad and all he did or you accept he was a false Prophet and a product of his time.
@Qarubo1
@nightsofgnosis
@lamarrfilms
@mogheess_
1) tazir punishment depends on judge not ruler
2) husband can strike his disobedient wife and force her
3) Forcing virgins doesn't make it any better
4) no not betrothed married, there is no easier way to end it than any other marriage
You didn't correct.
@AbuTarek373517
@FeedThePoorGood
@al_Bayraktari
I appreciate where you are coming from. Btw I'm not Jewish. My point was more, that the west is secular, it's not Christian, and as such Jesus is not sacred or warranting special protecting before the law.
@xbtGBH
This is proof women do not deserve autonomy. They will not date an average random dude with an average salary and college degree, but they will date people who rape (and continue to rape) children because they’re attractive.
@Mufaddal982736
@dajjal_dd
@GabrielSaidR
Would be kind of odd for the Quran to just contain stories that are most probably fiction. It's the same issue with dhul qarnain, 7 sleepers, story of khidr, all indicate the Quran is not from God but with enough mental gymnastics you can side step the issues.
@SyeH05
@bintabbz
I don't have any issue with homosexuality, I've had a number of gay/bisexual friends.
It's you guys who want to kill gay people.
Personally I like girls.
@SamuelC16233765
@a_leesha1
Except no, an islamist wouldn't vote in a British election due to considering it prohibited. Real islamists don't even consider it permissible to live in Britain lol.
@Muslim54467
@spurr_helen
@Bushra1Shaikh
I mistyped I meant integrated. But you're yet to answer the question, can we tell Muslims not to follow aspects of Islam that contradict the law?
@DumboRatFriend
@moietroses
Yes in principle she can get a divorce if he's not providing for her, but this doesn't negate the issue of people marrying people they don't know. As for not "satisfying", there's more nuance there. My point, Islamic segregation results in awkward marriages Muslims complain about
These barbarians for decades have been nurtured off of the welfare state. They must face the full force of the law. Breaking private property is not acceptable, if you don't like government policy vote through the democratic system.
@BrooklynJihad
Think you're missing the bit where in an Islamic marriage girls aren't as able as men to end it based purely on their discretion, not to mention the girl is obligated to have sex with him on demand. There simply isn't a comparison to this and dating.
@madrazzi
@HashashinTag
Besides him specifying 'for the mean time' isn't this something the Islamic scholars allowed? Namely marrying someone with the intention of divorce?
@RNDM144
@moietroses
Marriage with the intent of divorce is allowed in all 4 sunni school. Al shafi literally goes on a tangent defending it. A very small minority objected to it and their argument was bad. It's only in modern times this opinion that it's akin to muta has resurfaced..
@Mufaddal982736
@dajjal_dd
@GabrielSaidR
Isn't that a bit odd that you can't prove Islam and need me to specific my beliefs to attempt to disprove them? Also I'm not guilty of kufr, you're guilty of kufr as you lie about Allah revealing revelation to Muhammad.
@UmHamsaI
@HypnagogicStryx
That's simply not true. The limitations on women are literally what the classical books of fiqh state. You can pretend it's just men trying to be mean but really it's what Islam teaches.
Also the fact that Islam allowed slave masters to “have sex with” (rape) female slaves is also beyond disgusting and no amount of Yaqeen articles can change that
@BambiettaGO8
We can discuss in private. But it make it brief, there is a lack of evidence for Islam and the Quran contains errors (unless you ignore sound rules of interpretation).
@wiscrible
A woman cannot divorce LIKE a man by saying "you are divorced". Your argument about a wali presupposes women are dumb. Also, the scholars differ on whether her consent is required.
@islamicize
What's so outrageous about the picture? Would you prefer Palestine women were enslaved and sold to Israeli men? I mean that's what Muslims would do to non Muslims if they could.
@HATzortzis
So basically you're saying us non-muslims need to make sure you guys are militarily dominated to ensure religious freedoms, as otherwise you'll start killing apostates after a trial lol 😂
@fisabilil4h
@PhDniX
@CoinAggregator
1. Islam doesn't recognize non Muslim states such that vigilantism is prohibited there
2. If we take you seriously you are inviting us to militarily invade all Muslim countries so you guys don't go butchering
@hwmaqbul
Just to be clear, are you suggesting it's okay to kill critics of Islam aren't respectful, and or outright mock Muhammad? I look forward to your response.
@autumn_breeze99
@Simsimiyyah
Such a take no one suggested in Islamic history. Fiqh is law, law is based on the Quran and Sunnah interpreted through sound usul, the average person can hardly understand the Quran let alone derive rulings based on his feelings
@MuzGentleman
@come2dtruth
@Ahmedbhalmuslim
I am not whining, I am merely pointing out your tactic. Anything the Quran states that we can verify you will seek to make it unverifiable, this is clearly an attempt to maintain faith in a false religion.
While many of the 'sane actors' who concede to operating under international norms are only deserving of contempt. This ofc doesn't negate their use to us, but its hard to ever respect them.
Its just all very interesting to me.
@machine_you
@SimsimMaturidi
@mayrijuanaa
Don't expect an intelligent conversation from them. These are the same people who decry the west but still choose to remain in the west. The same people who celebrate Hamas but cry genocide when Israel defends itself.
@Muslim54467
@spurr_helen
@Bushra1Shaikh
"you're dirty", I think you're telling us more about how you view non Muslims.
Need I remind you, there is no Islamic state because of us.
@rozzaaaabd
@iAmBoredOfX
@nnnnnnxox
Except we are talking about what he did and not what he didn't do. Muhammad did marry and have sex with a child, so if he is the example for all times this act cannot be wrong.
@machine_you
@mayrijuanaa
@SimsimMaturidi
They'll be left behind anyways, the problem is we fund their lifestyle via the welfare state. If we cut the funding, these people simply wouldn't be able to survive without entering the workforce.
@Mufaddal982736
@dajjal_dd
@GabrielSaidR
No we are discussing proving Islam, you claim disbelieving in Islam is logically fallacious so by necessity Islam be a logical necessity. The fact you're not able to prove Islam, disproves your initial claim. You know deep inside there's no good argument for Islam..
@tingaiev
@poohwashe
@AlexKokcharov
@StasOlenchenko
Its a number of factors. A really important country can be a little corrupt. Ukraine is really not that important except as a buffer state, making it part of NATO would negate its utility as a buffer state.
@strangertco
@Snm86955179647
@MorpokAnkh71072
@hxhabg
Jizya is humiliation tax, not just any old tax. Some things we did in our invasions were a bit excessive, but I'm not making a moral argument here. I wouldn't be opposed to an invasion of Muslim countries where the women and children are enslaved.
@WBerbar14047
@MuzGentleman
@Isabree112
I'm not critiquing Islam for this actually, I'm critiquing Muslims for having issues with what's in Islam. I presented the screenshot to show that ibn hajr viewed Aisha as prepubescent well after consummation. It appears you aren't interested in Islam ironically.
@strangertco
@Snm86955179647
@MorpokAnkh71072
@hxhabg
You're flat out wrong to imagine Islamic societies are better than western societies, the standard of living in the west is better than any Islamic society. You can't make an argument from your preexisting beliefs
@strangertco
@Snm86955179647
@MorpokAnkh71072
@hxhabg
People harming their own body isnt a problem. Nor do we see our citizens as slaves such that they must reproduce, if they choose not to that's their choice. I don't see a problem with promiscuity it's a protected freedom. There freedoms don't neccessiate cannibalism or bestiality
@h4q3r
@abusillygoose
The language of the verses doesn't support your idea, the verses all mention the sun and moon in orbit, nothing about the earth. You are arguing when it says orbit it doesn't really mean orbit. Further, all the early Muslims would have understood it literally.
@fvxxo
In that case, is there any objective way to interpret religion? As ultimately each advocate of a specific interpretation can claim others are misinterpreting.
@JfidjdnE85901
@nasafism
Its not a problematic position per say but the fact that all sunni Islam ruled against it shows that the exception from the category is something in the Arabic language and as such you can't base a creedal point on something that is reasonably debatable