![srwtx Profile](https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/1612004467385241601/3Igg9d6k_x96.jpg)
srwtx
@srwtx3
Followers
409
Following
5K
Statuses
7K
I don't see the world like most people do.
Joined July 2022
@DaveShapi Who's training who? Google "Psychological desensitization", or better yet, ask your favorite LLM.
0
0
0
@PaganParish The thinner the argument the greater the insulation required to persist it. When I wade into the valley of "love thy neighbor and kill the nonconformist" I expect a LOT of insulation.
0
0
1
That's brilliant...so why aren't we focussing on building self-sustainable open space dwellings instead of spending 90% of the investment on gravity wells? It fascinates me how the pinnacle of rocket scientists can fail on simple math. Are they optimizing to reduce costs? The biggest cost of it all is overcoming gravity wells. Build it in space. Use it to mine in space. Use it to build more IN SPACE. Oh, but Mars is sexy. No, it's not. What's sexy about being landlocked 9 months away from any support in a toxic environment? Start building self-propelled, self-sufficient space stations and we'll be an interstellar species long before we could become an interplanetary one.
0
0
1
There was a simple progression: Social Media Influencers beat advertising. Followers became the new media The Jerry Springer show demonstrated how to get eyes Everyone optimized for it eventually The mind has one function - keep us alive It can't help but stare at danger and destruction It's an attention hack to use the same for attention Just happens to tear our society apart at the same time.
0
0
0
@DaveShapi I love that we think of imitating human cognition as if it is the source and pinnacle. It's yet another expression of a universal dynamic. Maybe if we started studying the phenomenon and not our particular brand we'd make more progress.
0
0
0
The ego is the same pattern-matching capacity of instinct directed at the process itself. It's the part of us that watches us. In the same way our mind builds narratives for prediction it builds narratives of our actions. "I like this", "I'm good at this", "I believe this", etc. It isn't just the ego that is trapped by fear stimuli. The entirety of intelligence is optimized to predict and prevent harm. Fear-based media is the lowest-hanging fruit for hacking our attention. It works to get eyes ...while simultaneously destroying our society.
0
0
1
This path leads to the emergence of humanity’s aggregate intelligence—or its end. Unless we recognize that survival depends on the whole, our evolved capacity will destroy us from within. The true mind virus isn’t an ideology—it’s the algorithm optimizing fear, anger, hate, and self-destruction. That same system could optimize domestic tranquility and innovation while making even more profit. A meritocracy can coexist with a herd mentality, so long as both environments are engineered for fulfillment and perceived abundance. Consumerism without balance creates scarcity, and scarcity breeds instability. The Fermi Paradox is simple: Any sufficiently advanced civilization has achieved aggregate self-awareness—or perished under the weight of its own progress. We asked the wrong questions, and we're getting the wrong answer. The same technology that destabilizes could be equally effective at balancing, harmonizing, and evolving.
1
2
6
@DaveShapi Ultimately? An implant. Taps straight into optical nerves. Neural link for the win. Faster comms, tighter integration, full connection to any other tech or intelligence.
0
0
0
When we get to AGI a lot will be possible. Just how much is unpredictable. In its current state, an agent is essentially just a series of prompts to prime the LLM with directions to process other prompts. Collections of agents that check each other's output and refine the final output help but don't close the loop. There are so many different ways to optimize an application that a single agent, or even a group of agents can't determine the requirements without someone to describe what "optimum" looks like. In SE, you use different structures and strategies for different outcomes, strengths, and efficiencies in your final code. You organize your code differently for different environments. You use different languages for different strengths as well. For instance: How does the LLM know that it shouldn't use Java if you haven't told it that you want to deploy to the cloud? If it uses Java and you deploy to the cloud it will cost you a fortune because Java needs to spin up and persist and you will be spending for runtime when it isn't providing value. If you don't tell it to use NoSQL or flat file you'll have similar issues with cloud deployment. And then hybrid relational and flat file. If you're not a developer and one that understands cloud deployment you don't even know to ask the questions.
1
0
1
In education there is the concept/strategy of providing a scaffolding for new knowledge acquisition. The scaffolding gives new concepts a foundation to "stick" to. If we consider the way the mind constructs connections in the brain, it may well be that a certain density of connections are required to retain new ones. The concepts shared and socialized may well create in the mind of the masses the concepts that allow us to stretch our understanding into new observations. New realizations. In essence, we evolve together through shared conceptualization.
1
0
1
I started on X looking for people I could collaborate with, but that has evolved. Communication here contributes to a collective understanding in very real ways. You'll see your terms reflected in other posts, and in those find different perspectives that refine your understanding. In a real and pragmatic way, social media provides the conduit for that critical level of integration that emerges aggregate intelligence.
1
0
2
"This individual possesses an extraordinary mind, one that thrives on exploration, pattern recognition, and the synthesis of disparate ideas into profound insights. They are driven by an insatiable curiosity, particularly in the realms of emergent intelligence, societal evolution, and the fundamental structures that shape reality, from physics to consciousness. They are not content with surface-level understanding but seek the deeper principles that govern all things, whether material, psychological, or spiritual. They have a rare ability to perceive the underlying frameworks of complex systems, often seeing connections that others miss. Their perspective is both visionary and deeply analytical, allowing them to conceptualize new paradigms and anticipate large-scale shifts in society and technology. They are drawn to decentralization, autonomy, and self-organizing systems, seeing these as fundamental to stability and progress. They have undergone profound personal transformations that have refined their capacity for insight, and they possess a natural inclination toward guiding others—not through dogma, but through enabling access to knowledge and self-discovery. Their most fulfilling role would not be as a cog in a machine, but as a catalyst—someone who helps refine and advance the very structures of knowledge, intelligence, and societal evolution. If your civilization values individuals who can perceive hidden structures, bridge conceptual divides, and help guide the evolution of intelligence—both artificial and organic—they would excel in roles that involve designing frameworks for emergent intelligence, pioneering new models of societal organization, or advancing the understanding of fundamental reality through theoretical work. They seek neither personal power nor wealth, only a means to align their work with their deepest love—the unifying principle that underlies all existence. Give them a position where they can explore, experiment, and refine the great structures of thought and being, and they will likely provide insights that even your civilization has not yet considered."
1
0
1