Ross
@srg5400
Followers
104
Following
246
Statuses
14K
Joined January 2012
@AubreyEl1 @CigarGuy45 @Bassassain37111 @TvFan22244419 @22ereh @DookusRoyal @another_poster @ReksGivins @9oldendragon @housered62 @Erik75071631 @iunderstoodu @fedmech @cspanwj @realDonaldTrump @FoxNews @January6thCmte It wasn’t a straw purchase. Rittenhouse was legally carrying a legal firearm.
0
0
2
@CigarGuy45 @TheTurtleBox @BobJohn53618882 @asareuben @kdotmcfarland @brndxix Well, they blocked me. Good thing facts don’t care about their feelings lol.
0
0
1
@TheTurtleBox @kdotmcfarland @brndxix Rittenhouse was allowed to use the firearm. He never took ownership. Facts matter.
1
0
0
@TheTurtleBox @asareuben @Biscuithammer0 @kdotmcfarland @brndxix No one sold a firearm to Rittenhouse…
0
0
1
@TheTurtleBox @Biscuithammer0 @kdotmcfarland @brndxix No, you’re just not comprehending and I’m not sure how to help you with that.
0
0
0
@TheTurtleBox @asareuben @Biscuithammer0 @kdotmcfarland @brndxix Rittenhouse didn’t purchase or own the firearm.
0
0
1
@TheTurtleBox @Biscuithammer0 @kdotmcfarland @brndxix Did you even read what you posted in the screenshot? Rittenhouse didn’t purchase or own the gun. Ownership of the gun was never transferred to Rittenhouse. He was legally allowed to use the firearm.
1
0
1
@TheTurtleBox @Biscuithammer0 @kdotmcfarland @brndxix So why do you have to lie about one case to try and make a point to someone?
1
0
0
@TheTurtleBox @Biscuithammer0 @kdotmcfarland @brndxix Rittenhouse wasn’t wearing plates. I don’t know that he was wearing steel toes but it’s pretty irrelevant…
0
0
0
@ThomasGray1981 @MetalCoreNTacos @esjesjesj None of that set a precedence. Post the WI statute stating all the people who were open carrying that night were breaking the law. State the WI statute stating that the other person is required to have a firearm in order for you to defend yourself.
0
0
2
@TheTurtleBox @Biscuithammer0 @kdotmcfarland @brndxix Since you’re lazy, the applicable Wisconsin statute is: 948.60(3)(c) -“This section applies only to a person under 18 years of age who possesses or is armed with a rifle or a shotgun if the person is in violation of s. 941.28…”
1
0
2
1
0
3
@AubreyEl1 @CigarGuy45 @Bassassain37111 @TvFan22244419 @22ereh @DookusRoyal @another_poster @ReksGivins @9oldendragon @housered62 @LStargazer54 @Erik75071631 @iunderstoodu @fedmech @cspanwj @realDonaldTrump @FoxNews @January6thCmte Rittenhouse was legally carrying a legal firearm per WI statute 948.60(3)(c). Rittenhouse did not point his firearm at anyone prior to being chased by Rosenbaum. I’m curious, can you articulate what Rittenhouse was attempting to do immediately prior to being chased?
1
0
4
@Biscuithammer0 @TheTurtleBox @kdotmcfarland @brndxix I’m not the one who mentioned the clothing. I’m not sure of the relevance in the Rittenhouse case?
1
0
0
@TheTurtleBox @Biscuithammer0 @kdotmcfarland @brndxix He wasn’t wearing plates or a button up. He didn’t illegally obtain a firearm. I’m not sure why you keep mentioning “travel across state lines,” but it is legal to travel from one state to another.
1
0
2
@Biscuithammer0 @TheTurtleBox @kdotmcfarland @brndxix I don’t know how the clothing matters but who I was replying stated he was dressed for combat. Idk what they mean by that, but Rittenhouse was wearing normal clothing.
0
0
0
@AubreyEl1 @CigarGuy45 @Bassassain37111 @TvFan22244419 @22ereh @DookusRoyal @another_poster @ReksGivins @9oldendragon @housered62 @LStargazer54 @Erik75071631 @iunderstoodu @fedmech @cspanwj @realDonaldTrump @FoxNews @January6thCmte He successfully argued his life was in danger. He did not aim his rifle at anyone until he was chased and attacked. He did not commit a felony. He did turn himself into the police. Do some research.
1
0
2