@investingidiocy just follow Nancy’s trades 🙌

@mousecrackers @danzu72 @allenanalysis oh no it hurts … too much peak alpha, fantasy delusion 🫠😒

@allenanalysis and no copies? and WHOOOO will verify that it’s enforced, that there’s no copies, that there’s no backdoors?? Congress and the courts think they can just wave a wand and “so mote it be” into existence, but someone needs to enforce it with the proper backup

@donsatamoto oh man, love that woody desk look, very nice; congrats on the setup and that IBM keyboard is old school cool 👌😅

@ehjovan he’s both … our water makes guys try butt stuff

@destraynor this looks like Minority Report lol

@bkonyd cutting USAID funding is having real consequences 😜

@KTmBoyle that is really cute hehe … he might also enjoy Dirty Jobs reruns

@ElmoTheHokage uuhhh ... cope nothing to take away from the fact there's plenty of happy people not making a lot of money ... but the money sure makes a lot of problems poof away

@luciduous @markscianna need a perm to get the curls and then it's IPO

@PopBase I like how even PopBase knew about it hehehe

@zjfrank13 i guess we're doing No Fap February

@divinoguache pour one out for the homo homies

@Dshoopy0 @jam3scampbell @jzellis This is a bad-faith engagement game for you. That question has already been answered, by fact that fine-tuning on specific data is how you extract the actionable insights anyone would want to make it purposeful. Your bad-faith is noted.

@Dshoopy0 @jam3scampbell @jzellis Fine-tuning on the Treasury data is best way to have the LLM understand and make it useful. LOL “as per” my screenshot from Claude, “LLM’s can … re-identify supposedly anonymized data … [and] potentially memorizing and reproducing.”

Rather, do you not see how Marc is using the political language of “censorship” to describe “AI safety” … and in this way, he is already showing his desire to control your world view on the subject? So why wouldn’t he try developing AI tools that “control” you to his personal benefit, even if that conflicts with your own interests?

@tsarnick You are saying, “this thing will control everything … so let’s not have guardrails on it.” The guardrails are the censorship, using the word censorship is just a method of political signaling for what details you are expected to reject on the basis it’s not @pmarca approving it.

@SnazzyLabs Yeah. This path is not the way though. Democracy means consensus building not the “tyranny of the majority” ruling party which are Republicans, as James Madison would have put it in Federalist 10.

@StefanFSchubert Absolutely not. I love my family, but the line is clear. Our innate duty is to grow and protect the species. Protecting one while sacrificing billions makes no sense to that innate duty to the species.