Sean Ross Callaghan
@seanrcallaghan
Followers
1,678
Following
1,410
Media
325
Statuses
17,063
Attorney, author, and tech entrepreneur. @Newsweek , @AmericanThinker , @Amspectator , et al.
America
Joined June 2018
Don't wanna be here?
Send us removal request.
Explore trending content on Musk Viewer
America
• 1103188 Tweets
Happy 4th
• 1050761 Tweets
Labour
• 722819 Tweets
Independence Day
• 635792 Tweets
Reform
• 604046 Tweets
Tories
• 336449 Tweets
Tory
• 221838 Tweets
Kendrick
• 183910 Tweets
#GeneralElection2024
• 146079 Tweets
Ecuador
• 102239 Tweets
Sofía
• 61543 Tweets
#SVAllStarsGala3
• 50416 Tweets
Marta
• 44511 Tweets
gremio
• 40283 Tweets
Whitney
• 40103 Tweets
Channel 4
• 35641 Tweets
Abel
• 32774 Tweets
Wesley
• 31493 Tweets
Rony
• 26309 Tweets
Estevão
• 24461 Tweets
もちづきさん
• 22187 Tweets
Garro
• 20295 Tweets
Renato
• 19773 Tweets
Nadine Dorries
• 19034 Tweets
阿部ちゃん
• 18081 Tweets
Sunderland
• 16873 Tweets
Jhon Jhon
• 14051 Tweets
#あさイチ
• 11942 Tweets
#C4BritainDecides
• 10920 Tweets
野村大樹
• 10191 Tweets
Pinned Tweet
Pope Francis is ultimately responsible for all of this. He is the worst pope in the Church's entire two-thousand year history. May God take him from us soon and, be it His will, have mercy on his everlasting soul.
21
15
46
@sparrowmedia
"You make me feel so unsafe, and all I want to do is chase after you and tell you about it."
42
760
13K
@LilaGraceRose
If she's poor and refuses a prenup but expects you to be a wealthy businessman and support her staying at home—red flag.
26
42
1K
@DanCrenshawTX
Do you even understand the difference between Title I of FISA and Section 702?
Are you a liar or a complete blowhard?
You wrote "you already have to get a warrant to access ANY American’s data."
Under Section 702—what you're voting on tomorrow—that's completely false. Totally.
9
49
961
@DanCrenshawTX
You wrote "you already have to get a warrant to access ANY American’s data."
That's totally false. Totally.
You're either a total blowhard without a clue—or you're a liar.
26
51
936
@charliekirk11
Savor for a moment that when the neoliberal regime wants to "take out" a neoliberal candidate, all its henchmen do is start being fair and accurate.
That's it.
And then it's over.
22
98
948
@greg_price11
There is no "public interest in a speedy . . . verdict."
That's a made-up notion without basis in the Constitution cooked up just to "get Trump."
13
103
915
@RepThomasMassie
@elonmusk
Most people also don't realize that blue states and districts *already* have too many House seats and electoral votes because of miscounting in the *last* census.
54
227
823
@FischerKing64
My gosh. We have video of Biden saying that this what he's doing and Mayorkas smiling beside him as he says it.
That wasn't enough for Mr. NPR Softtones?
3
29
747
@GovGianforte
That's not the question. The question is whether medical staff or government officials in Montana encouraged or abetted a fourteen year old to become or to act like or to be treated as a transsexual despite her parents' pleas to stop.
Did that happen? Answer that.
7
30
579
@IsraelWarRoom
It's not a secondary explosion. I thought that at first, too.
It's a second missile. You can see the missile incoming.
5
3
525
@martyrmade
Well, actually, as long as we're paying for the Gaza war, I do expect the
@IDF
to live up to our standards. Completely.
6
7
433
@AWeissmann_
Everyone coming to this thread looking for legal insight from Mr. Weissmann should be forewarned that he is offering you none. Just rhetoric.
37
22
419
@rainnwilson
@TuckerCarlson
A lot of people who actually listen to him or read him instead of the propaganda about him have that same reaction.
2
14
374
@JustinWolfers
Are you claiming that net immigration into the United States is trending down?
17
2
352
@kerpen
It might be better for her.
Have you seen the raw contents of that laptop? The ones Murdoch chooses not to publish?
44
5
350
@axios
This headline is propaganda.
A federal district judge has no "superiors." Every federal judge is a life-tenured judge appointed pursuant to Article III of the Constitution.
Neither is a federal district judge under the authority of any other federal district judge.
7
44
370
@arkivx
@RepMikeLawler
@ImMeme0
Why assume that he wrote it? I'd be unsurprised if this was not written for him and handed to him along with a campaign donation.
11
6
351
@julie_kelly2
How long do you think it might be until we learn that the
@FBI
raided Mar-a-Lago simply to steal the Crossfire Hurricane binder because it implicated the
@FBI
in even more misdeeds than it's already been found to have perpetrated?
34
101
348
@davidfrum
Interesting rundown, David. Missing something, however:
There is, manifestly, no emergency in Canada right now. Manifestly. No reasonable man could say that there is. This is not a matter of debate anymore than the color of the sky.
It's unreasonable even to fail to say this.
4
18
299
@Julio_Rosas11
Evidently not just in support of Hamas but in specific support of its savage attacks on Israeli civilians. That's the meaning of including the hang glider in the graphic.
7
12
317
@JDVance1
Remember Rush Limbaugh's admonition: their core fear is that if a real-estate developer from Queens can get it done, they'll have to explain why they didn't.
43
30
299
@KariLakeWarRoom
If I understood earlier testimony by County officials, such a discrepancy could not have occurred unless ballot printers were reprogrammed without authorization.
That's just the testimony so far. We'll see the rest of the evidence.
Don't blame me. I'm just the messenger . . . .
12
31
298
@McFaul
He said the same thing about Ukraine—right before he attacked and crossed the Dnieper.
21
4
300
@oneunderscore__
No one is forcing beer drinkers to stop drinking Bud Light. It's not a "campaign."
It's just what happens spontaneously when your side is deeply bizarre yet extremely pushy and therefore highly unpopular.
9
8
283
@MattWalshBlog
@VAKruta
"The vast majority of citations and charges against George Floyd protesters were ultimately dropped, dismissed or otherwise not filed, according to a Guardian analysis of law enforcement records and media reports . . . ."
17
40
263
99
9
243
@MattWalshBlog
Wait, you're telling me that a cult committed to overturning 1.2 billion years of sexual reproduction and demolishing any linguistic or logical convention standing in its way is . . . extreme and willing to transgress various social mores, even those against violence?
No . . . .
8
12
233
@DrEliDavid
@DineshDSouza
@netanyahu
"Our greatest ally" calls us prewar Nazi Germany after cashing our $25 billion dollar check.
What gall.
39
19
248
@jpodhoretz
I oppose sending $14.3 billion of borrowed money to Israel, too.
Am I a "disingenuous piece of anti-Semitic filth?"
4
8
242
@AmbDermer
We, literally, defended you. Several times. As in, our sailors and airmen engaged in war to defend you from military attack.
The last time was just a few weeks ago—right before your Prime Minster gave an international address to call us interwar Germany and a threat to Jews.
17
8
250
@JenGriffinFNC
We can—and we must—hamstring the U.S intelligence community.
Kill Section 702. Return the FISA to its 2008 state.
7
27
241
@WisenbergSol
Like I said:
5
31
235
@RichardHanania
"Data scientist."
The relative ratio of intergroup crimes should be 1 no matter the size of the groups if their crime rates are the same and neither has an intergroup preference.
It's not that complicated.
6
1
223
@GriffJenkins
@FoxNews
They are not "migrants." They're not planning on returning.
They're immigrant aliens—the illegal kind.
Use proper language.
8
16
222
@dcrosaryrally
That minion of Francis', a vicious Leftist whose abuse of his office for the benefit of Democrats was legendary during the first Trump administration, has quite the gall to show his face there.
7
13
225
@MattWalshBlog
Bud Light and Budweiser brands are owned by an international conglomerate controlled by three families, at least two of which appear to be Belgian nobility from the Middle Ages.
So, no; if I am a "patriot," Mr. White, I do not in fact have to drink "gallons" of
@budlight
.
5
11
227
@jayedelson
This is a load of nonsense, and every paragraph of this complaint should be scrubbed for compliance with Rule 11.
And, you should be ashamed as this use of judicial process for a political stunt brings disrepute to you and your firm.
67
6
225
@RepMikeLawler
@ImMeme0
The bill tries to incorporate a definition of so-called anti-semitism that could plausibly cover the New Testament. Your defense is that the bill maybe doesn't do anything. Why don't you do something that matters for America? You're the poster child for Congress' approval rating.
2
15
223
@mkraju
Absurd. Aliens "not fleeing persecution . . . who are not entering at ports of entry" are already deportable under current law.
Providing discretionary authority above a threshold implies a recission of authority below it.
This so-called deal welds the floodgates open.
4
24
220
@josh_hammer
@benshapiro
I agree with Tucker on the general point that, over the last nearly three months, there has been a stark misallocation of attention away from America's priorities and toward the priorities of foreign nations, including Israel, by some on the Right.
12
8
208
@JonathanTurley
It's obvious what's probably going on. The
@FBI
is using Smirnov's (probably made-up) contacts with Russian intelligence as a pretext for seizing Catherine's records—and more, no doubt. Catherine broke the story on Smirnov's FD1023 and was fired about a day before he got charged.
10
60
215
@JesseKellyDC
Frankly, he very well may prevail.
Smith's legal theories are hoaxes. It's not a federal crime to contest an election.
And for the Supreme Court to pretend otherwise would do more damage to legal precedent than any Justice but perhaps two are likely to stomach.
9
13
202
19
1
187
My latest, at the
@AmericanThinker
.
"A unanimous Supreme Court should restore the federal courts’ reputation by denouncing 'Javert' Jack Smith and his jurisprudence of jihad . . . ."
17
49
188
@jcp717
Hi Juan-Carlos, my name is Sean Callaghan. I'm a graduate student in psychology doing research into the cognitive distortions behind obstinance, and I noticed that you haven't deleted this tweet yet.
Would you have time for a short interview today to help me with my research?
11
17
177
@DougAMacgregor
You've been saying it's over for a year and a half.
There's a slight chance that you're full of it.
6
4
182
@shipwreckedcrew
Right.
"All you had to do, Mr. President, was sign this piece of paper and then you would not have violated the Espionage Act; but, you forgot to; so, straight to jail."
That's how how Article II seems to work.
19
29
174
@JackPosobiec
@kleavittnh
Her answer is wrong.
The right answer is "I hope someday we go back to a time when politicians are above sharp branding like 'Newscum,' but we're in a time when a regime party has declared war on half the country. So, no. I have no problem with the epithet 'Newscum.' I like it."
14
9
181
@McFaul
Here are 19 excerpts from his State of the Union speeches and his speech to a Joint Session of Congress.
"The time for . . . fights is behind us."
"True love for our people requires us to find common ground."
"So let's work together[ and] compromise."
20
17
179
@harrylitman
Tell your readers the standard for a writ of mandamus.
It's not "I disagree with how the district court has resolved this question of first impression."
Or not. Just keep feeding your readers what they want.
7
11
180
@JakeSherman
A bunch of Congressmen don't even vote, and the amendment fails by a tie.
What vile cowards.
4
10
175
In the Senate, a warrant amendment could pass.
So, what does Chuck Schumer do?
He scrambles to make sure that senators, somehow, never get to vote on one.
That's not "Stasi like" at all, of course.
Newsy FISA update for Senate watchers:
—Leadership trying to get a deal on amendment votes to be able to wrap this up by tomorrow, but the concern is that some of them (like the warrant amendment that resulted in a tie in the House & Wyden’s amendment to scrap Turner provision)
12
134
391
4
45
175
@SteveRattner
If they're not allowed to vote, then why does your party have such a problem agreeing to prevent them from voting?
13
2
168
@RobertJSalvador
@Jason
@RobertIger
Sometimes, he has good tweets; other times, like this one, you're perplexed.
4
0
160
@NASCAR
NASCAR may be struggling with understanding that many people, perhaps most—and certainly nearly all NASCAR viewers—believe that a knee had nothing to do with George Floyd's death.
And that's undoubtably a reasonable view, which may be wholly correct.
8
12
162
@karol
@benshapiro
I'm reading Israeli newspapers quoting Israeli officials saying that the convoy was knowingly targeted. Three times.
I'm reading Hebrew-language news magazines like Local Call also quoting Israeli officials, who claim even worse things about the
@IDF
.
What am I supposed to say?
8
7
166
@EliseStefanik
You voted for Deep State spying: Section 702. Why? Are you in favor of the Deep State, now?
When did your opinion on the Deep State change?
4
10
160
@BlueBoxDave
It's fathomable, mandatory, and possibly insufficient.
America's reputation has never recovered since our overreaction to 9/11. America's legendary and customary viciousness in response to attack is not always a moral or prudent behavior to emulate.
11
4
154
@mcuban
If the most qualified candidate is hired, then hire only the most qualified candidate and get the same result.
Why are you resisting this race-neutral maxim?
0
2
155
@mrddmia
On the nose. You're exactly right.
If some would take a beat, get some rest, and look at the matter with a fresh cup of coffee in the morning sunlight, they'd see that it's dangerous nonsense to disagree.
This isn't a Law & Order cliffhanger.
It's real life in a real country.
7
10
151
@_Peter_Cook
@MichaelGreenspa
The convoy, according to
@IDF
sources interviewed by
@haaretzcom
, was targeted. On purpose. Knowingly. Three times. To kill everybody. All the aid workers. British and American citizens alike.
Supposedly to kill one person—a militant or perhaps just a security guard—who wasn't
14
5
144
@NetanelWorthy
@POTUS
You have not been abandoned. Your entire war has been bankrolled, according to reports, by the United States. More money and arms are on the way as you type.
If you are ever abandoned by the United States, you would be left with a greater impression than bad feelings.
7
1
139
@EdwardPentin
The difference between what Pope Francis said and what Cardinal Burke said is that what Cardinal Burke said made sense.
There were subjects, predicates, verbs, and such. There was some thought to follow.
Such damnable rigidity!
3
5
139
@CBS_Herridge
I'm so shocked that a Justice Department minion committed a felony to leak out-of-context grand-jury information essentially irrelevant to proving President Trump's guilt—just to defame him and prejudice, unethically, the venire.
Shocked.
Never would've seen that coming.
9
26
138
@Charles_Lister
@LucasFoxNews
Non-state actors don't have tactical ballistic missiles.
This was Iran.
12
8
134
@NCRegister
That's absurd, and how dare you. Those who claim that the document attempts to authorize blessings of homosexual unions may have read it and may not be "intentionally misrepresenting it."
They may, dear newspaper, just know what words mean—words like "couple" and "union."
10
4
136
@USCatholic
@TiaPhD
The episcopal conferences of Africa are the Church's most conservative and traditional.
Stop treating black people like props and start treating them like teachers—if you've humility enough.
1
3
131
@Voight75
@paulsperry_
"Confidential" and "secret" are legal classification categories. They're material.
"Like confidential" and "like secret" are not.
The case depends on legal classification categories.
If Paul's reporting is accurate, Jack Smith should be sanctioned and criminally investigated.
12
9
126
@JacquiHeinrich
I am pleading with all concerned to remember that Biden held a ceremony in the Oval Office the afternoon of his inauguration—it was the first thing he did—to reverse President Trump's border polices.
4
33
136
@JakeSherman
You're focused on generating a story. And for all we know, the guy you're showcasing is, too.
Virtually anybody can put on a costume and show up in New York City to run into you. They could be paid to do it.
It's not interesting. It's not newsworthy.
1
3
131
@JeremyDBoreing
"You cannot restore America with Catholicism . . . ."
Why not? Because American Catholics are not toadies for Israel?
9
1
129
@shipwreckedcrew
Wasn't a DEA agent charged for being on the Capitol grounds but not inside the Capitol?
He was peaceful but armed. He was charged, then, presumably to juice the gun statistics for the insurrection propaganda.
4
11
128
