@Pibble_owner @EvangelicalDW All you got is Ad hominems and straw men. Not logical arguments, no evidence to support your claims. Who bewitched you?

@Pibble_owner @EvangelicalDW Demonstrate it with evidence how they can delete 3.9 million and still maintain 6 mil. You cant. So the only way you can maintain your position and win this argument is with Ad hominems. Now I'm a white supremacist which is a completely unrelated topic. lol

@Pibble_owner @EvangelicalDW No one should be excommunicate for what they believe to be the truth about a historical event. Excommunication is for those who deny the faith, or are in unrepentant sin. Its not a sin to have a wrong take on history. Simple stuff.

@Pibble_owner @EvangelicalDW If its been debunked for years, why are you still using the 6 million number?

Its really simple Gary, the original number in 1945 was 6 million. Then Auschwitz museum changed their number to 1.5. Majdanek changed their numbers from 1.5mil to 78k. These are numbers provided by the official pro holocaust experts. No one needs to read any revisionist historians take to see you cant delete 3.9 million from the 6 mil number and still claim 6 million. But if you are a judaizer, then the math works out great. lol Even Raul Hilberg, which you probably never heard of, was the top holocaust expert who wrote a 3 volume book on the Holocaust had the total at 5 mil in 1985. You can call me a holocaust denier all you want, but you are a holocaust liar.

@clarence8577680 @AdameMedia There is sin on all sides. Strange you cannot see the sins of Israel.

@clarence8577680 @AdameMedia It doesn’t help the Zionists genocided 700k of the Arabs in Nakba and have basically made Gaza an open air prison. It also doesn’t help Netanyahu funded Hamas to prevent the 2 state solution.

@Pibble_owner @EvangelicalDW Then you are a judiazer. Being in right standing with God = faith in Christ + “correct” view of Jewish history. Now all our interactions make sense.

@Pibble_owner @EvangelicalDW Way to sidestep being called out on your ridiculous sinful behavior. I guess you are justified in anything you do because your cause is righteous.

It’s not a sin to have a wrong take on history. Nor is it minimizing the pain Jews suffered if you don’t believe it happened. Perhaps you will be relieved to learn 6 million didn’t die in the Holocaust. The Auschwitz museum changed the number from 4 mill to 1.5 in the early 90s That’s their number not mine or the revisionist camp. You think it’s biblical to excommunicate someone for having a wrong view of history?

Is this your stick to go around the internet yelling hyperbolic and inflammatory accusations at people? Do you have a lot of success winning people over to your truth with that? You might want to consider tempering yourself and actually providing an argument with supporting evidence before you accuse people. Perhaps you should share your message with your elders and ask them if your presentation and rhetoric reflective how to treat a brother in Christ. Listen to your self: -you’re a blind eye cancer that is trying to slip into the church Tares amongst the wheat. -you’re part of the woke Reich! -you’re a Hitler sympathizer! -you’re antisemitic & racist! Who is the accuser of the brethren? No facts, no evidence, no scripture. Just accusations. Yet I’m woke? lol. You sound like you should sign up for BLM. Same rhetoric and manipulation attempting to align my character to evil things so you can achieve your goals.

I stand unashamed by everything I’ve said online. In the case with Nick I’ve never heard him say anything antisemitic, but I use the proper definition which is a hatred of ALL Jews, based on their race. Perhaps he has said some things that fit that definition, but I have only seen clips others have shared of his. And for the record I think Nick is over the top in his focus on anti Zionism, to the point he didn’t vote for Trump which makes him a one issue voter. Pretty stupid when Trump is so much better on many other issues. I don’t believe criticizing Jews or Israel is inherently antisemitic. How do you define antisemitism?

Clearly I would rebuke LGBT or leave as I have a clear definition of that sin in scripture. But I don’t know anyone who hates all Jews simply because of their race. I have crossed paths of a few online, and when they said things like Jews can’t be saved, or they were all born with extra evil in comparison to everyone else, I have addressed it and every time they agreed with my argument. But it has been rare. Thus why it’s not at the top of my list. Now your experience may be different, and perhaps you have adopted the Jewish progressive definition of antisemitism where it changes and updates over time to adopt any criticism of Jews or Israel or anything Jews don’t like. And if it’s the case that you accept their broad definition then I can see why it’s at the top of your list.

Legalism is adding your own rules and regulations to scripture. There does not exist any scripture that says I have to spend my time on issues you believe are more important. Your heaping burdens on me that I don’t have to carry. My heart is fine contrary to your ridiculous claim.

@Pibble_owner @EvangelicalDW Stop being a legalist. I will address what I’m led by God to address. Instead of heaping burdens on other brothers in Christ, why don’t you take responsibility and be the change you want to see.

@Pibble_owner @EvangelicalDW I clearly said oddball on this topic, which is true in the Calvinist camp which is dominant post and amil. I’ve not disrespected him in any way, and I know he has done some good work on other topics.

@Pibble_owner @EvangelicalDW I don’t need to do anything. I’m staying in my lane of focus. Feel free to address those issues yourself.

For clarity, all dispensationalists are premil. Historic Premil believes the church is Israel I use the term “progressive” dispensationalism as they have abandoned the heretical parts of classic Darby dispensationalism, but hold to the Israelology Zionists parts that Darby introduced into the church for the first time in the 1800s.

@Pibble_owner @EvangelicalDW I’m not a Calvinist either. MacArthur is the odd ball out in the Calvinist Reformed camp on this topic. He is a progressive dispensationalist. What argument of His do you think makes your point?

It is accurate to talk generally about Israel as ethnic jews at that time period as that was the dominant members. But that does not dictate that Israel was in fact only comprised of Jews. Also we must take into account all the things Scripture says about the term Israel. Paul says not all Israel are Israel. And what were the gentiles grafted into? The new covenant was made to the house of Israel. So clearly everyone who is a member of the new covenant is part of the house of Israel. Perhaps it would be helpful for you to acknowledge there are 2 Israel's, believing Israel and unfaithful Israel. Believing Israel is who is in the new covenant, and the true spiritual house of Israel.