🚨🚨 NEW ARTICLE ON BIRTHRIGHT CITIZENSHIP (link in comments) This new article analyzes the legal foundations of birthright citizenships and how the concept as applied to children of illegal is completely unrelated to its original context. The tl;dr is that not only can birthright citizenship be terminated, but there is also a case for revoking it retroactively

RT @JoshRainerGold: Ashkenazi Jews are pretty clearly White, not only superficially as most people seem to need to check “early life” to kn…

"It is meant to be used"

Fuentes on Southerners: "They're all just clones, they're all just NPCs".. This better describes his follower base than it does southerners

The US Chinese Exclusion Act was in effect during 1886

@feelsdesperate 110-140-110

JD Vance is a treasure for America

RT @Absolunar: found your school dude Lol,

@kuan_fan34 Someone who is employed in a purely technical role where his anti-White opinions are not shared in the workspace, nor are they incitement to violence, and nor are they posted under his name should not be grounds for termination.

This is clear, but let's say there's some legitimate business interest in not being associated with certain viewpoints or activities, or certain individuals who themselves are associated with such viewpoints and activities... (This applies more to private employers than the federal government, although even in the case of the federal government, the ruling administration, e.g. Trump may suffer a political cost)... But there's still a distinction between someone openly expressing certain viewpoints, and someone, perhaps allegedly in the past, expressing such viewpoints. The former is visible to the general public, but the latter requires complex investigation and resources. There's a bunch of other issues here.. archive searches are a dangerous tool.

@kuan_fan34 It shouldn't matter what opinions he posted, because he attempted to anonymize his opinions and because the associations of such opinions with his role as an employee has only been made coincidental by a journalis.

So there's a distinction between someone posting viewpoints on a public Instagram or Facebook account, and between taking deliberate steps to anonymize such viewpoints.

He did not express his views in his capacity as a federal employee, nor did he even express his views under his actual name. Cancelling people based on statements they've made previously, or statements they've made anonymously sets the stage for Journalists controlling someone's eligibility for employment.

@kanyewest How much do you pay?

@elonmusk @Anarseldain While I obviously disagree with his thoughts on Israel, he should remain, if his only reason for termination are his political views!

@kuan_fan34 But he disparaged his superiors, which is a no-no in general.

@kuan_fan34 As an employee or as a student?

@kuan_fan34 Federal employees are already protected from termination on account of their political views