![Brad Crawford Profile](https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/1119724081845342209/4PSKIDYZ_x96.png)
Brad Crawford
@provoter
Followers
785
Following
25K
Statuses
23K
Woe to the electorates bested by the obscurantists.
Joined April 2009
Self-govt is a game of poker between citizens and government. Government will always see most of our cards, so as long as we let them hide their cards from us, we're doomed. The people must know whatever government knows, or self-govt & its freedoms will perish from this earth.
We should be the ones knowing everything about the government, not the other way around. We are private citizens, they are public servants. We pay them in the form of (insanely high) taxes, yet they treat us like potential criminals who need to be monitored 24/7. Why accept that?
2
6
63
@TuckerGoodrich Truly it is, right down to enforcing its own code of omertá. Getting a peek at the books, it's more obvious than ever why the unspoken oath to secrecy by all the insiders has always been so ruthlessly enforced.
1
0
3
RT @jeffreyatucker: Did you know that presidents and their appointments have not had access to payment systems since 1946? I did not. Did y…
0
4K
0
I get that lots of people don't agree with this, but truly I don't get HOW they manage that feat. Go through the whole thing line by line and state what you disagree with and why. People won't because they can't.
I’ve posted this before but I may just post this analogy every month so that my own position is abundantly clear: If a motorcade drives up to my street led by two UN cars and tailed by two UN cars, with two buses in the middle filled with 20 heavily armed terrorists, their many wives, and all their children, as well as three cars filled with “journalists” and cameramen, and stops a little down the road, then all the armed men get out and start going door to door gleefully shooting and murdering everyone they find, and then they break in to my home, shoot one of my children and kidnap two, taking them back to the buses just to sit behind their wives and children while hiding mine under the seats, and I had one chance to rescue my children but it would mean doing what is necessary… … I would step outside with rifles in hand knowing that to rescue my children I would have to kill the terrorists, and in order to do that I’d have to kill their wives and their children to get to them… I wouldn’t even bat an eyelid. Every single person other than my children would be taken out, and that includes the people in the UN cars, the journalists and the cameramen. My sole responsibility as the mother of my children is the safety and security of my children, not those who shot one and kidnapped the other two. The fact that they brought their children to the situation is on them, not me. There would be no ceasefire, no negotiation, no discussion of any kind whatsoever. All I would be thinking of is rescuing my children from murderers. And I would likely unload so much lead that none would even make it to their afterlives. If they wanted their families alive, they shouldn’t have come for mine. Now in reality, that’s the situation Israel faces. We’re surrounded by murderers who only want to kill every one of us and have been trying and doing it for a century. Except the difference between then and now is that we are armed and capable of defending our people and our children, and we will do whatever is necessary to protect them from those who exist only to wipe us out. What the world thinks and wants is irrelevant. If the world wants to protect the murderers so badly, then by all means take them to live inside your countries so they can murder your kids and then let us know how you get on. But don’t tell us how to protect ours. Because we’re not asking for your permission or your blessing. We don’t need nor care for your approval. These sick f***ers started something and we will finish it. That is our ONLY responsibility. We don’t need to feed them, house them, or give them light. They want us dead, and so they will be shown force and only force. When our children are returned safe and the murderers lay down their arms and cease to want us dead, we can talk. Until then, they will get only what they give and more. How many of them die depends on when they release our children and stop trying to kill us. That’s it. Those are the rules. So to all those who have criticized us for 16 months… until you’re in our shoes for just one day, STFU. Your fake outrage and activism makes you idiots, not humanitarians. The fact you’re too damn weak and pathetic to protect your own children is on you. Not us. Whatever it takes, we will do whatever we must to exist when so many want us not to. Tough shit. Deal with it or cry until the end of time. The days of terror ruling the world are over. They hunt us down because of hate. We will now hunt them down because we love our children more. End/
0
0
0
@NickJFreitas The old saw about a conservative being a liberal who got mugged applies to libertarians as well. Libertarians not named Javier Milei have traditionally had no fight in them, no plan for combating the evil in out society and every other.
0
0
1
No one suspects her kids aren't from her x-husband (she said she was "legally married to one person [which was her brother] and culturally married to another [the actual father of the kids as far as anyone knows]). Any test would be for sibling genes between her and the brother she was, as in her quoted words above, legally married to. But it would never come to that. For one the brother lives in the UK now. And two, there is zero doubt it was her brother she was legally married to and zero doubt she did it to enable the brother to fraudulently get a US green card. Both parts of that case are airtight. All they need to do is question her under oath -- in some city whose residents are not all Dems like in DC. No way she denies the charges since it would be guaranteed prison time and probably revocation of her citizenship and then deportation.
0
0
1
@MeeshFL @HerbsandDirt For sure you have to know Exley. Go to YouTube channel Aluminum Research Group. That’s his channel and it’s pretty much one-stop shopping - though web searching his name will of course get you additional material.
0
0
1
@KurtSchlichter I look for some sort of weasely narrow SCOTUS opinion that doesn't say flat out POTUS must submit to all district court rulings but that still leaves him way more hamstrung than the Constitution ever contemplated. Hope I'm wrong.
0
0
0
RT @MarioNawfal: MARC ANDREESSEN: ELON SOLVES PROBLEMS FASTER THAN OTHER COMPANIES ORGANIZE MEETINGS “Elon has developed an operating meth…
0
5K
0