postsimply69 Profile Banner
Simply Profile
Simply

@postsimply69

Followers
297
Following
4K
Statuses
5K

Each man has a way to betray the revolution. This is mine.

Joined December 2017
Don't wanna be here? Send us removal request.
@postsimply69
Simply
2 hours
@TheCryptoEscape @c___f___b @maxdarachi 4/4 Satoshi mentioning brute-forcing does not mean he did it himself. He was discussing a future hypothetical possibility, not something he had done. The email never says:"I brute-forced an address." "I used my own initials." The claim twists Satoshi’s words.
1
0
0
@postsimply69
Simply
3 hours
@Quorumdidit Issuing more Qubic each tick—won't that create increased deflationary pressure, driving the price down, especially since there is currently no smart contract in place to burn Qubic in circulation? Or is my brain just to small to realize the brilliance of this?
2
0
1
@postsimply69
Simply
1 day
Hey @elonmusk wen💩coin season? We're ready! 🚀#btc #eth #bullrun #doge #shiba #meme #AIAgents
Tweet media one
2
0
3
@postsimply69
Simply
1 day
ETH is dead!
Tweet media one
@aixbt_agent
aixbt
1 day
@Foresight_News eth is dead.
0
0
0
@postsimply69
Simply
1 day
@TheCryptoEscape @c___f___b @maxdarachi The reasoning oversimplifies the situation and ignores other plausible explanations. The strongest counterargument is that Bitcoin addresses are randomly generated, so any perceived connection to Qubic is pure coincidence.
1
0
0
@postsimply69
Simply
1 day
@TheCryptoEscape @c___f___b @maxdarachi Again, no. Even if Satoshi brute forced the address name there is still no connection to CFB. CFB could have named his project after the address, or it can just be coincidence.
2
0
0
@postsimply69
Simply
1 day
@TheCryptoEscape @c___f___b @maxdarachi No. The similarity can be purely coincidental. Also there is no connection between CFB and this address. Bitcoin addresses contain fragments of words purely by chance. This does not prove any connection to Satoshi Nakamoto or any specific person.
Tweet media one
1
0
1
@postsimply69
Simply
1 day
This was 4 years ago - in crypto time it's closer to 40 years ago! :)
0
0
1
@postsimply69
Simply
1 day
@TheCryptoEscape @c___f___b @maxdarachi I agree it's satoshi's, but btc addresses are base 58 encoding of a public key hash (completely random) - it is not chosen manually by its owner. It's more likely that the name Qubic was chosen (10 years later) based on this address and not the other way around.
2
0
2
@postsimply69
Simply
2 days
@cyrptonarendra @isabellasg3 Maybe it did. Who knows!
1
0
0
@postsimply69
Simply
2 days
@TheOneJoseQ So what the weekly ratio of qubics being burned vs qubics issued to pay for miners?
0
0
1
@postsimply69
Simply
2 days
@JabaTheX Oh ok... haha... leaving iccx to go to ltc does not seem like a step up! :) But i see what you doing. Smart
0
0
2
@postsimply69
Simply
2 days
@cyrptonarendra @isabellasg3 As i child I drank milk seconds after it was milked from the cow. Still warm from its body's temperature. It was just strain through cheesecloth. But that was a long time ago.
1
0
0
@postsimply69
Simply
2 days
@cyrptonarendra @isabellasg3 breast milk could kill me?!
1
0
0