![netcit Profile](https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/1279808271323455489/UMpP5cX6_x96.jpg)
netcit
@netcit2
Followers
3K
Following
47K
Statuses
7K
MN resident / Conservative/ 2A supporter/ LE Supporter/ Republican Supporter ~ But I'll still question even you/ LTC Provider
SE Minnesota
Joined May 2016
So it appears our President has to ask permission from unelected Judges before he can take action to reduce spending. (At least until @USSupremeCourt gets hold of it). Lovely
🚨🚨🚨BREAKING: Judge enters order clarifying that Trump Administration can proceed to cancel funding of Hotels4Gangs ©️ and use normal procedures to check for fraud. 1/
0
0
0
1. Be patient and let the Trump DOJ respond to these orders by law. 2. While the DOJ is responding, begin a congressional inquiry/investigation into each of these Judges for any ounce of impropriety (not just disagreeing with their decisions). 3. If found, begin Imprachment proceedings against the activist Judges. 4. Can the DC Federal Jusges and District Courts be dissolved? If so, consider this. Above all - obey the law and do not fall into the Dem trap leaving them a 4 year opening to repeatedly utilizing lawfare to stop the movement.
0
0
0
@RepTomSuozzi Ask yourself why over 77 million American citizens voted for Donald Trump. We don’t trust you anymore.
0
0
1
@GovTimWalz Ohhh here we go
🚨 BREAKING: Minnesota House Republican leaders have formally requested U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi to launch a DOJ investigation into fraud and mismanagement in Minnesota state programs.
0
0
5
@GovTimWalz If Mayo Clinic funding were being threatened you can bet that Mayo Clinic would be on the front line of the screaming session - alas we hear nothing from Mayo. Pray tell Governor, what NGO’s are you and your administration involved in?
0
0
8
@HouseGOP W T F are you doing? Stop! Just stop. Your thievery is in full view and yet you continue. Shameless - all of you. At times I wonder if it would be better to go to jail for not paying taxes than to sit idly by while someone I elected into office openly steals my money! See where this is going @GOP @SenateGOP
0
0
0
It seems to me that @housegop is sitting around holding @realDonaldTrump & @elonmusk coats while they stand on the firing line. Primaries: When I see an incumbent, I choose the next box. You are all worthless, House and Senate. I'm intensely disappointed in your colossal lack of support with any of this.
1
1
5
@ResisttheMS Then he should stop running his yap and get 'r done. Just be prepared for the consequences
0
0
2
@LawrenceBJones3 Any other employee that spends unauthorized payments out of a company - would be prosecuted. Are these 4 people special? @PamBondi or are you still arranging your office?
3
8
31
It appears as though @scotus needs to determine whether this country’s decisions/operations are made by appointed judges or elected representatives. If this is how the game is to be played then every blue state governor can be stopped dead in their tracks the same way. Double edged sword.
36
2
10
@OcrazioCornPop A great view on the mounting Judge TRO’s:
Here is a long take on the court injunction crisis, which is less crisis than an opportunity… OK, stop panicking about all the stupid legal decisions from leftist judges that the left is getting from judge shopping in leftist jurisdictions. Stop. Panicking. First, no one should be surprised by any of this. The administration certainly isn’t. We always knew exactly what they would do. Do not take the fact they are not screaming and yelling as them rolling over. They are not rolling over. There’s plenty going on behind the scenes as administration lawyers prepare their papers for the legal fight to come. Second, since we have to have this fight, this is the time and the battleground to have it. Why? We want it settled right at the beginning of the administration so that we don’t have to deal with this down the road. And we want to fight on these orders because 1) they are manifestly the result of bad faith judge shopping and the opinions themselves are both procedural and 2) they are substantively ridiculous. They are legal jokes. Don’t listen to the dummy lawyers on Twitter - only listen to me or the people I tell you that you can rely on. Everyone telling you these are reasoned, valid legal decisions is either a legal illiterate or thinks you are stupid. Third, the way this fight is happening is to our advantage. Wait, you ask, we’re getting decision after decision against us! How can that be good? Because they are leaving the Supreme Court no choice. People want Trump to sound off about this, but he doesn’t need to. What’s left unstated is the fact that he can just not obey these manifestly improper orders. They say it’s a constitutional crisis now, but that becomes a real one when they push Trump too far. He’s not going to submit forever to micromanagement of the executive branch by activist District Court judges in blue cities across America. And Chief Justice Roberts knows it. CJ Roberts and majority of the court know these are ridiculous legally, and the last thing they want to do is stake the credibility of the Court – which famously has no divisions – on this kind of nonsense. They are not going to jump on the grenade that is these decisions. There might someday be a fight with a president about something where he is legally in the wrong, but this is not that time. This is not the hill the Supreme Court will die on. Wisely, Trump’s not adding fuel to the fire by threatening to do what it’s very clear he can do, which is disobey. This provides SCOTUS the cover it needs to deal with these upstart district courts without looking like Trump strong-armed it. So relax and let the process go forward. We’re going to win on all these injunctions, and I expect fairly quickly
1
2
5