See report for more info, and see the report PDF for specific results for each of the 55 universities sampled

RT @elonmusk: Major vibe shift!

RT @TheFIREorg: POLL: Americans rank free speech second only to inflation on their list of 2024 concerns, according to a new poll by FIRE.…

RT @epkaufm: This important new book, features a key diagram from @PsychRabble & @natehoneycutt explaining how academia is systematically b…

@PsychRabble Lots of great data synthesized in the book ... Some of those faculty datapoints come from the FIRE Faculty survey earlier this year:

@TomCotter17 @primalpoly Such an effort is underway. Society for Open Inquiry in Behavioral Science, with accompanying journal.

RT @TheFIREorg: Free speech makes free people. Today, FIRE is expanding its free speech mission beyond college campuses to protect free sp…

RT @HdxAcademy: “A new paper… examines whether the political views of academic philosophers are associated with willingness to discriminate…

RT @nathancofnas: Uwe Peters, @natehoneycutt, @DeblockBlock & @PsychRabble on political discrimination in philosophy Substantial % of phil…

@PsychRabble @MerlinPsychSage @psforscher Also, no mention of suspicion check questions ... seen folks make a big deal about potential sample pollution if p's recognize intent of the study (given prominence of past audit research)... but doesn't seem to have been assessed here.

@DebMashekHxA You're welcome! It was a great session.

@PamelaParesky You’re welcome! I thought they were great questions!

@cgrodriguezr You’re welcome! The posts from you and Cory inspired me to give it a shot.

Audience Q cont: "... Jay: you showed how the perception of the field is that liberal papers would be less like to be replicated … is that not reason enough to be concerned about the lack of viewpoint diversity?” Jay: "Yes, but we need to test it.” 25/end