![Q Profile](https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/1457238362562170880/76RVttuc_x96.jpg)
Q
@mrqbtw
Followers
153
Following
4K
Statuses
6K
When every Democrat Senator votes no on RFK, author of NYT best seller 'The Real Dr Anthony Fauci'... Please remember those are the same people who to this day tell you this guy was an American hero: The theory that Dr. Anthony Fauci knowingly lied about the origins of COVID-19 stems from his involvement in funding EcoHealth Alliance, which in turn funneled money to the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV) for research on bat coronaviruses. The allegations center on whether this research constituted illegal gain-of-function (GoF) work—experiments that enhance a virus’s ability to cause disease in humans. 1. The NIH Funding of EcoHealth Alliance & Wuhan Lab -The National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), under Fauci’s leadership, provided funding to EcoHealth Alliance, a nonprofit led by Dr. Peter Daszak. -Between 2014 and 2019, EcoHealth received NIH grants totaling around $3.7 million, part of which was sub-granted to the Wuhan Institute of Virology for research on bat coronaviruses. -In 2017, despite a U.S. moratorium on gain-of-function research (2014–2017), the NIH under Fauci resumed funding for projects that many experts argue met the definition of gain-of-function. -Internal documents show that the EcoHealth grant proposals explicitly discussed altering bat coronaviruses to increase their ability to infect human cells. 2. Did Fauci’s NIH Fund Illegal Gain-of-Function Research? -The Wuhan lab research involved inserting spike proteins from bat coronaviruses into genetically modified SARS-like viruses, increasing their infectivity in human cells. -In October 2021, the NIH admitted that EcoHealth failed to report results from a 2018 experiment where a modified bat coronavirus became more infectious. -Despite repeated denials in public and congressional testimony, Fauci was later confronted with evidence that these experiments fit the NIH's own definition of gain-of-function research. -Critics argue Fauci misled Congress by saying the NIH did not fund GoF research, despite documents contradicting his claim. 3. Fauci’s Role in Shaping the Lab Leak Narrative -In early 2020, Fauci worked with Dr. Francis Collins (then NIH director) to dismiss the lab leak theory, despite internal emails showing he was aware of its plausibility. -February 1, 2020: Fauci held a private teleconference with virologists, where some scientists (including Dr. Kristian Andersen) initially expressed concern that COVID-19 looked engineered. -Within days, those same scientists publicly reversed course, calling the lab leak a “conspiracy theory” in The Lancet and Nature Medicine—papers that Fauci later cited in public. -It was later revealed that Fauci and Collins pressured these scientists behind closed doors to downplay lab-leak concerns. 4. Avoiding Scrutiny: FOIA Evasion and Private Communications -Fauci used personal email accounts and phone calls to discuss official government business, allowing him to evade Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests. -Key example: When Fauci and Collins coordinated their response to the lab-leak theory, Collins suggested they avoid email for sensitive discussions. -The NIH slow-walked FOIA requests, only releasing heavily redacted communications years later, further fueling speculation of a cover-up. 5. Censorship and Coordination with Big Tech -Internal emails (from FOIA requests) show that Fauci and government officials worked with social media companies like Twitter and Facebook to suppress lab-leak discussions. -July 2021: The Biden administration, with Fauci’s input, urged tech companies to censor COVID-19 “misinformation”, including posts suggesting a lab-leak origin. 6. Was There a Cover-Up? -Congressional testimony in 2023 revealed that Fauci’s NIAID continued funding EcoHealth Alliance even afterthe Wuhan research raised concerns. -EcoHealth failed to provide progress reports on experiments that might have led to more virulent viruses. -Despite all this, Fauci never faced criminal investigation and retired in December 2022. Conclusion The allegations against Fauci revolve around misleading Congress, funding gain-of-function research despite denials, and suppressing the lab-leak theory while evading scrutiny through backdoor communications. While there’s no direct proof Fauci “knew” COVID-19 leaked from the Wuhan lab, the circumstantial evidence suggests he worked aggressively to downplay any possibility that U.S. funding played a role in the pandemic’s origins. Over a million Americans died, millions more globally, worst inflation cycle in 50 years that crippled 100s of millions economically, destroyed the development of millions school age children. Millions of people lost their job. He lied about mask effectiveness. Made up pseudo science about social distancing he later admitted to. Ushered in the most authoritarian time in American history in dozens of states. Pushed for mandatory experimental mRNA vax that had never been used before and had very little data to support the “safe and effective claims.” Pushed it on children, despite there being overwhelming evidence that healthy children and young people weren’t at risk for serious COVID 19 cases. Told you it would prevent infection and transmission. Joe Biden pardoned him for every possible crime going back to 2014, the same year his partnership with eco health alliance began. This is the biggest scandal in American history and every single Democrat Senator this week will try to make sure RFK, who knows about all of this, never steps foot into a position where can make sure it doesn't happen again. Sources used:
2
2
3
@BenjaminDEKR Yeah leaking company secrets is generally frowned upon literally everywhere grow up
0
0
0
@davidhogg111 @elonmusk Who elected the 2 million federal employees and 3.7 million federal contractors? 80iq argument
1
0
7
@Jonahresistsgop I think you’ve made enough of an ass out of yourself for one night, it’s pretty clear you aren’t going to try to challenge anything, because you know what will happen the moment you do, I’ll cite the evidence and you will look like a bigger idiot then you’ve already demonstrated.
0
0
1
@Jonahresistsgop In my opinion Fauci is bad that’s subjective opinion of mine. Now once again can you refute any of the objective facts I’ve laid out. There’s what 20 bullet points for you to choose from. Still waiting.
0
0
0
@Jonahresistsgop What question have you answered you have dodged the only one I’ve asked you this entire time? What is a single false claim made?
1
0
0
@Jonahresistsgop Let it be known the self proclaimed courageous, stander up toer of lies, has given over a dozen responses in this thread. Yet not one of them was a refutation of any claim made.
1
0
0
@Jonahresistsgop Who hates gay people me or the woman defending the man who held a position of authority and used it to negligently allow thousands of them die?
1
0
0
@Jonahresistsgop You won’t argue with me because you can’t. You probably know close to nothing about anything. Again i invite you, to point out a false claim made.
2
0
0
@Jonahresistsgop Oh he certainly is a bad guy and he’s been a bad guy for a long time going all the way back to the aids crisis. But again let’s move away from subjective “Fauci is bad”. I made over a dozen claims of things that are either true or not true, black and white. Which aren’t true?
1
0
0
@Jonahresistsgop what part of my post isnt true? Theres plenty of claims, which of them are false?
1
0
0
@BenjaminOCall It’s not strange at all if you have been paying attention and have an iq above 100, the reason why is painfully obvious
0
0
0