Bookmark this, many tutorials coming for major chains and wallets. First two are @solana to @base and How to Buy $BRUCE on BASE using the mobile wallet by @phantom via @YouTube

🚨 If you’re active on X, paying for verification is worth it. Here’s why: 1️⃣ Verified users boost engagement. The more verified accounts interact with a post, the more reach it gets. It’s not about posting constantly anymore—it’s about who engages with your content. 2️⃣ Your replies matter more. A blue checkmark gives your comments more visibility in threads, meaning more impressions, profile visits, and potential followers. 3️⃣ Better features. Edit tweets, post longer videos, and even monetize. The perks add up. 4️⃣ Easy ROI. If you like, comment, and retweet often, you’re missing out on extra reach by not being verified. If you’re serious about growing on X, verification isn’t optional—it’s a growth hack and it's cheap. 🚀 #SocialMedia #X #GrowthTips

I tried out the lending strategy on Goosed. As you can see in the screenshots. I borrowed against my amount and once goosed got to a higher mcqp I sold a small amount to pay back the loan, in the end I have more goosed and now can repeat. You can see my token balance go up to 40 million available after I paid the loan. The dollar amount isn’t important here, it’s the strategy and ROI percentage. Tomorrow I’ll show how using vote fees to amplify this strategy work. It’s stacking similar to biohacking but focused on your financial wellbeing.

I had my son just now do this. He has 2.2 million $BRUCE and just borrowed around 0.065 $ETH worth. He has 105k votes this epoch and will have 195k next epoch. He is 13, has no clue market has dumped because he just dabbles in goose. But it will be a good real world scenario where he takes fees and pays off his loan.

What is #memefi on @goosedotrun Well here is a real world example: Last night, I put together an interactive tutorial using an account with nearly 1 million $BRUCE. I borrowed $ETH against the full amount, then used that $ETH to buy more $BRUCE. I’ll be sharing the tutorial later today. Once the position hits 2x profit, I’ll drop a follow-up tutorial showing how to unwind the trade: selling everything, paying off the loan, using 75% of the profits to buy back more $BRUCE (reserving 25% for short-term taxes), and then reborrowing at the higher valuation to repeat the cycle. This strategy not only increases the amount I can borrow each time, but it also generates more swap and lending fees. The creator earns 40% of the 5% lending fee, and since I buy back and burn fees on my own token, every step in this loop benefits me, $BRUCE holders, voters, and the entire boost pool during the epochs these transactions take place.

It’s been awesome to see members of @credexium take these tools and run with them. I just mentioned @CryptoCoug, but I have to give him another shoutout because a few things really stood out to me. He took the core ideas and leveled them up in some unique ways. For the second epoch in a row, his #Goosed token has 2.5x more rewards for voters than the next closest on the list. His approach ensures current holders win, voters earn massive fees, and those votes fuel buybacks and burns—creating even more benefits for holders. A few things that really impressed me: •He clearly communicated his goals and the rewards tied to them. •He got the community involved by running a contest for the best “honks” about his token, rewarding participants with tokens. •When the token dipped slightly after the first epoch, he stayed positive and committed to burning another 1M tokens once it rebounded—which not only happened but pushed the market cap 40% higher. •He teamed up with @devsmokeypete and got on a livestream, bringing in even more eyes (and buys). If you’ve been on the platform, you can’t miss what he’s doing. I’ve learned a ton just watching him build his token, and it’s been really cool to see.

The @credexium Token Economic Framework: Why It Works $Bruce has thrived while the market tanked. Holders aren’t selling because the framework is built for win-win outcomes. It requires risk, faith, and upfront capital, but the key is not extracting value too early. Most projects launch with vague promises, keeping supporters in the dark. That’s a huge problem. When I created Bruce, I wanted full transparency—a system where leadership doesn’t exploit the community. Core Principles: 1.Real, Tangible Benefits for Holders •Holding the token itself yields rewards—no need for blind faith. •Early buyers have already profited significantly. 2.Recognition & Rewards for Early Supporters •I’ve supported countless projects, only to be ignored later. •Here, early adopters are valued, engaged, and rewarded. 3.Community-Driven Growth •This isn’t about one person—it’s a team effort. •Nobody extracts personal value, including me. 4.External Revenue Streams •A token can’t survive on its own—outside revenue is essential. •The NFT system funnels revenue into governance votes, strengthening the ecosystem. Tax & Profit Strategies •Poor planning can drain a project through taxes. •Our system minimizes taxable events, keeping more value in the ecosystem. 6.Risk & Money Management Expertise •Profits must be strategically reinvested. •I personally used arbitrage to generate $16,000, passing those savings to the community. 7.Powerful DeFi Tools for Users •People need financial tools to maximize capital efficiency. •We use @goosedotrun to launch powered by @mavprotocol lending, governance voting, and and gamified voting fee incentives with buybacks. 8.Scarcity & Liquidity Optimization •Burns are meaningful, not gimmicks. •Liquidity is strategically managed for long-term stability. 9.Consistent, Meaningful Rewards •Holders must see and feel the benefits of participation. •Regular buybacks, burns, and governance incentives keep engagement high. Growth Over Hype •Many projects chase big numbers too soon. •We started small, focused on real engagement, and scaled naturally. Education & Support: A Key Difference Most projects assume users already understand complex DeFi mechanics—but one wrong move can mean losing everything. That’s why we actively teach: ✅ Video tutorials explaining token mechanics ✅ Discord support where members help each other ✅ Step-by-step guides for risk management & DeFi strategies We’re not just spoon-feeding people—we’re teaching them real skills. Bruce isn’t just a token—it’s a launchpad for financial independence. Holders leave smarter, more skilled, and prepared to build their own success. This proven framework is why Bruce has held strong while the rest of the market collapsed. Trust, transparency, and sustainable tokenomics work.

A lot or institutions and even local governments are talking about adding Bitcoin and Ethereum reserves. Although some may move relatively quick, the majority will be slow since they most likely have to vote and then the logistics of getting money into the system. Market makers know this and they are aggressively trying to suppress while we are in this limbo. I give it one month max before droves of money start pouring in. This is the safest time to believe in crypto that has ever existed on this earth, don’t let these idiots persuade you otherwise.

Just grabbed more Goosed and $BRUCE while $MAV keeps dipping. Sold 25% of other projects. My go-to strategy: get in early, scoop up ~16M tokens on anything promising, and sell 25% here and there over two months. Once I’m out, if the project’s still strong, I’ll buy back in and repeat the loop. It’s insanely profitable, and if you’ve been tracking my wallet, you’ll see most of my $BRUCE buys come straight from these gains. Getting in super early guarantees that 25% sales are rewarding, and if the token moves fast, it’s an easy profit play. I’ve noticed snipers piling in cheap early and exiting after a month. This is all under the radar since @goosedotrun isn’t being talked about or listed anywhere, but that’s the edge—comfy plays where I’m deep in the ecosystem daily, refining strategies. That’s real market fit. What I didn’t expect to love is how these sub-$50K marketcaps operate. The external game revenue flowing into these tokens keeps them alive for some absurd gains. Bottom line: making money on Goose is ridiculously easy, even in these market conditions.

Technically this is bad advice and you shouldn’t do it, but for funsies lets explore the gray.. So, you're feeling that FOMO because crypto's pumping, and you're staring at your 401k like it's a prison sentence. You could take an early withdrawal--sure, there's that pesky 10% penalty, but hey, mental anguish is a hardship, right? The real kicker, though, is that once you withdraw, the IRS is just chilling with a chunk of your money, earning interest while you sit there waiting to pay your tax bill in a few months. Feels great, not really. But what if there was a smarter way? Enter DeFi wizardry. Instead of handing over your hard-earned money to Uncle Sam upfront, you could use something like Goose's flat distribution token model. Here's the play: 1. You take your 401k withdrawal, pay the penalty (ugh), and instead of giving the IRS their cut immediately, you roll your funds into your own token--a fully audited, DeFi-backed asset where you control almost all of the supply. 2. Since you own nearly all of it, you're effectively dictating the liquidity and borrowing terms. 3. Borrow against that token, pull out the $25K you would've sent to the government, but instead, you stake it somewhere that earns interest for a few months. 4. When tax time actually arrives, then you pay them, but at least now you squeezed out a little extra instead of just letting them hold it for free. But the real magic here? You've got a token where the supply is mostly locked up under your control. As long as you're not draining it, you're creating a high-value, low-supply situation--essentially flipping the table on traditional finance. And if others see that your token is structured like this, they might actually want to buy in, knowing you're aligned with the same long-term value strategy. You don't even need to go all in--test it with 1 ETH first. $3K experiment to see if the mechanics work. Worst case? You've just dabbled in next-level DeFi and learned a new way to optimize capital. Best case? You've just created a structure where you maximize borrowing power, avoid unnecessary losses to the IRS, and potentially profit off people realizing you're playing 4D chess with your finances. This is the kind of stuff that makes DeFi sweet

Exactly right, the tax benefits can be massive. I am only borrowing against the memecoin I created, where I secured a lot of the supply and we have bi-weekly burns from outside revenue of around $1k-$1300 every 3.5 days. I know I won't dump on myself, but not sure the intentions of others so for now just sticking to my own creations, but it allows like you said a tax benefit, along with the freedom to wait 1 year or more to get a lower tax on those profits. Anyway, I am building dashboards on Dune to show the actual numbers so people can see if it works for their specific situation.

Eventually all of the Tornado cash predictions I made will come full circle and you will be sad you didn't buy $TORN

I'm going to be testing out a strategy this epoch on $BRUCE and I think it will work, if it does, I have effectively figured out a way to boost burns, while also giving bruce holders and voters an opportunity to buy subsidize tokens at next to zero cost. I posted the full strategy in discord for your reading pleasure.

Websites that upcharge for features tend to fall into the same negative loop. You see a tab or some data, click on it, and—boom—it’s hidden behind an upgrade wall. Now ask yourself, how often do you actually upgrade vs. just stop using the service altogether? If analytics are tracked properly, the data will show that users exit when they hit these nasty rotten Easter eggs. It’s a terrible UX pattern. @Dune gets it right. You can run simple queries for free, but for bigger projects, queries naturally time out. Instead of blocking access upfront, they show why the upgrade is needed, allowing users to tinker and test freely while verifying actual compute demand before asking for payment. Bad upgrade loops can kill good websites overnight. If you’re designing an upsell flow, make sure it doesn’t push users away before they even get a chance to see value.

Borrowing and lending features can be super risky and I encourage everyone to take a policy if possible in regards to insurance coverage against contract exploits. One thing that attracted me to @goosedotrun and it’s lending feature is the fact it’s part of @mavprotocol built in contract to borrow against your own liquidity in the pool. These contracts have been audited by top firms, and they make this possible due to the capital efficient way they manage liquidity. There pools need about 1/10th the liquidity vs others which sends their capital efficiency score above 400%. The more I study their contracts, the more bullish I am on the vast amount of possibilities to create customized liquidity and defi options for any project. Even Aave used their pools to keep a stablecoin pegged at $1.

Yeah, I didn’t touch this feature at first, until I started to see how it was used. Worst case scenario is you borrow against a memecoin that dumps and the amount borrowed can’t be repaid until price returns, however since there is no ongoing payment, interest or liquidation, your tokens are much more secure than a a model like Aave. Another scenario is you lose the borrowed money in some other way. The best usecase is leverage LONG the same token you are borrowing from. The good thing too is if the token value drops a lot, the tokens locked in lending which are about 21% on BRUCE cannot be moved, so it creates incentives for the price to return and protection on massive dumping. We are creating 4 tokens that will specifically track the data on this lending feature available for everyone to see real numbers over the next few months.

Every memecoin target market focuses on the dev or creator. The retail buyer continually is late to the party and gets dumped on. @goosedotrun changed the game with memefi by incorporating sound DeFi options in a safe environment and empowering individual users to participate and win twice a week with fee incentive votes via staking $MAV So, it’s cool to see creators raking in the money, and I’m being sarcastic its the dumbest tweets I see, because the people who they brag to are you and me sitting in underwater bags at their mercy to do another pump so we can exit.

Another suggestion for @goosedotrun and something that should cost money for creator to participate and the pot each six weeks goes into graduating the testnet winner tokens. This would be a game-changer for credibility and skill-building among creators. Instead of just watching tutorials, people could actually prove their knowledge through hands-on experience, verified on-chain. Here's how it works: • A course & certification program runs in six-week cohorts. It's optional, but those who complete it earn an NFT badge verifying their skills. • Everything happens on a testnet, so creators can learn by doing without real financial risk. They launch tokens, engage real test users, and complete structured tasks covering proper memecoin creation, ethics, risk management, marketing, token ops, and more. • Completion is verified on-chain, ensuring every step was actually done. No fluff, no fake systems--just proof of work. • Support comes from private Telegram/Discord groups, with documentation and guides. • At the end, participants get their NFT certification. The top performers (based on metrics like user engagement and task completion) win additional recognition. Gamification & Incentives: • Top three creators from each cohort win a prize--maybe their testnet token gets a boost to replicate on the main site. • Test users who helped during the testnet phase get an airdrop when the real token launches, rewarding participation. • The system tracks creator behavior over time--are they building consistently and investing effort, or just serial launching low-effort projects? This doesn't guarantee honesty, but it does provide a clear, public track record of who has actually put in the work. And for creators, it's not just about the NFT badge--it's a way to showcase real, verifiable skills that could open doors to employment, partnerships, or launching serious projects.

A few @goosedotrun ideas: Right now, when people win an epoch, they get gold, silver, and bronze medals, plus achievements like "new coin with the highest market cap" or other milestones. Instead of these just being stats buried in the system, they could be NFTs minted and sent to the token's contract. That way, the achievements are displayed directly on the token's page, creating a visible, verifiable history of success. This means: • If a token is rising fast, you can prove it with achievements and medals. • If a token is consistently winning every epic, that track record is public. • Newcomers can instantly see who's putting in work vs. fly-by-night projects. Right now, there's no simple way to track this history. Sure, the point system exists, but it's unique to the platform and requires explanation and is a per epoch tool mainly. A clean, visual system--starting with just gold, silver, and bronze badges on token pages--would add instant credibility and fuel competition. Plus, it makes social sharing effortless. On top of that, voters who add substantially could claim an NFT based on their votes for projects who won a medal. This will also show the skill of voters to start building credibility organically and give creators a built method to verify loyalty and further reward people. And yeah, I might be a little biased because of $Bruce, but the reality is, this would make it way easier for people to see which projects are actually proving themselves week after week.