motherofswans Profile Banner
Mother of Swans Profile
Mother of Swans

@motherofswans

Followers
555
Following
5K
Statuses
2K

Stage IV lung cancer EGFR19, seeking more time with my children. Jersey City gritty and proud. America first🇺🇸

Philadelphia, PA
Joined August 2021
Don't wanna be here? Send us removal request.
@motherofswans
Mother of Swans
5 minutes
@rockytfs @doc_BLocke @VPrasadMDMPH There are so many YOUNG never smokers who are screened out. Myself included. By the time there are symptoms, it’s often too late to be cured. How many people die from incidental findings? Serious question. The current system needs to change.
0
0
0
@motherofswans
Mother of Swans
19 minutes
How many people die from incidental findings vs how many die from not checking?
0
0
0
@motherofswans
Mother of Swans
21 minutes
@rockytfs @doc_BLocke @VPrasadMDMPH I understand where you are coming from -living without, and not losing family to lung cancer
1
0
0
@motherofswans
Mother of Swans
22 minutes
Not to be rude but a breast cancer commercial during the Super Bowl when lung cancer kills so many more is a bit offensive. Would have been a great platform to inform people that cancer has more colors than just pink.
2
0
1
@motherofswans
Mother of Swans
23 hours
0
0
0
@motherofswans
Mother of Swans
1 day
Tweet media one
0
0
0
@motherofswans
Mother of Swans
1 day
@illium51 Recent. Tonsil not alarming for me as I’ve had it react before. Been an issue since childhood even after removal. Axillary concerns me
Tweet media one
0
0
0
@motherofswans
Mother of Swans
1 day
@illium51 Thanks Mike. I wasn’t really happy about only taking one of the cervical nodes last time. Two totally different locations. It is cancerous until proven otherwise.
1
0
0
@motherofswans
Mother of Swans
1 day
If over diagnosis is common, let's just ignore all lung cancer findings now. Sounds like a solid plan. Because clearly, a 47-year-old non-smoker with a history of symptoms is just another statistic in your overdiagnosis bingo card. Let's just play it safe and assume all lung nodules are overdiagnosed until proven otherwise. What could go wrong?
1
0
1
@motherofswans
Mother of Swans
1 day
@doc_BLocke @VPrasadMDMPH Oh, so because it wasn't part of a fancy screening program, we should just ignore it? Brilliant logic. 🤔 Because clearly, finding a lung nodule by accident isn't as important as finding it in a scheduled screening. Right.
0
0
1
@motherofswans
Mother of Swans
1 day
One size does not fit all! 👏
@VPrasadMDMPH
Vinay Prasad MD MPH
1 day
Great question! The correct answer is that no one knows for any patient. Although we are much more likely to be aggressive in a 55 year old person with smoking history (vs 85 non smoker), & depending how the mass exactly looks, we have no randomized data to show if we help or hurt, and if it varies by these effect modifiers
0
0
2
@motherofswans
Mother of Swans
2 days
Who wants to tell him?
@kwood360
Keith Wood
2 days
It appears that the "rich" conservative talk show hosts are just becoming aware of what we the people have known for some time but spouting about how our tax is being wasted without anyone doing anything about doesn't help anyone. #Hannity #Bongino
0
0
0
@motherofswans
Mother of Swans
2 days
@oncodaily @BenCreelan @StephenVLiu Can it? Does it work on patients with MRD? EGFR driven?
1
0
0
@motherofswans
Mother of Swans
3 days
@ProfRAScolyer I hope your scan shows good results for you!
0
0
0
@motherofswans
Mother of Swans
3 days
@catturd2 Because they are still shredding documents and smashing hard drives
0
0
0
@motherofswans
Mother of Swans
3 days
@LuisRaezMD @MerusNV Thank you. I will have to look that one up. Never heard of it. So happy treatments for more people
0
0
0