![Jamie Timmons Profile](https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/1472194302864506885/uGz-hkiD_x96.jpg)
Jamie Timmons
@metapredict
Followers
2K
Following
24K
Statuses
18K
OMICS-Data-DrugDiscovery-Metabolism-Aging. Odd humour reflects my fusion of Scots-Irish & Jewish š§¬ š²
Camden Town, London
Joined May 2011
Detailed illustration of how modelling of bulk transcriptomic data (Custom Affymetrix HTA & no not random WGCNA) provides information about rare cell types (<1% of bulk) @MACleod_JC studies long noncoding RNAs during muscle hypertrophy - 90% missed by illumina bulk RNAseq @thermofisher Network-based modelling reveals cell-type enriched patterns of non-coding RNA regulation during human skeletal muscle remodelling
1
3
12
RT @tangming2005: 4/ Unfortunately, itās becoming harder to find bioinformaticians who can double-check results, question their data, and sā¦
0
12
0
RT @tangming2005: 2/ Working with bio data isnāt always about fancy models. Itās often about handling messy real-world dataādoing quality cā¦
0
9
0
RT @tangming2005: 1/ It feels like basic bioinformatics skills arenāt getting enough love anymore. Everyoneās talking about their deep learā¦
0
8
0
RT @Nature: Nearly three-quarters of biomedical researchers think there is a reproducibility crisis in science
0
188
0
Given T2DM increases with time/age, what is a genetic control for such a study? š
The genetics of diabetes is likely better studied than that of any other complex human diseaseš§¬ For reference, the largest GWAS for type 2 diabetes included 2,535,601 individuals (428,452 cases)āļø šthis review covers all aspects of human genetics in complex diseases
0
3
3
@simocristea If we consider their intended purpose, failure in n=1 setting means they are fundamentally useless. None of them have revealed any biology, and they are often applied in settings where they aren't valid (cell culture). Largely a scam since 2013....
0
0
3
@MWeintraubMD @JialiangLiang Firstly it's whole body DXA, not direct muscle mass (which would be protected from loss if provided supervised RT). Secondly the 0-3kg loss is a few % of total "lean mass" in this group. Unclear if any problem here. The 10yr on/off GLP1RA study required - who's funding?
0
0
0
RT @nicolelampert: Iāve been a journalist all my working life and I love my fellow journalists. But I have to ask, what the hell is goingā¦
0
2K
0
RT @fake_journals: Finland Publication Forum will downgrade hundreds of Frontiers and MDPI journals | @RetractionWatch |
0
40
0
RT @OxygenIvan: @RetractionWatch Double edged sword. Too much pressure in this direction and weāll get more of what we already have (at leaā¦
0
1
0
RT @Mr_Andrew_Fox: Theyāve been lying to you for 14 months with their willing NGO and media friends. Fake starvation, fake injury videos,ā¦
0
786
0
RT @metapredict: Weird associations & failure to accept data are so susceptible to reverse causation it's another example of exaggerated clā¦
0
1
0
@simocristea We have clues from medical imaging - billions of data points per topic. lucky if we have a few thousand assays for a subset of kinase inhibitors (public). A few million for a relatively narrow range of targets across industry (assuming assays used predictive of disease efficacy)
0
0
1
@simocristea Yes, as a recent CAD PRS study, using a dozen or so strongly validated models (>AUC) individually could place each person into high, medium or low risk at random. Ie cohort level statistics wasn't informative at n=1....
1
0
1