mechabere Profile Banner
Professor Bere Profile
Professor Bere

@mechabere

Followers
369
Following
10K
Statuses
9K

a Man of Science.

Adam Tahir University
Joined April 2024
Don't wanna be here? Send us removal request.
@mechabere
Professor Bere
5 hours
@wintergroyper1 @RichardBSpencer These perfect structures are actually imperfect because they contain necessary contradictions that facilitate their potency.
0
0
2
@mechabere
Professor Bere
5 hours
@wintergroyper1 @RichardBSpencer It is very equitable because this is the only reason why Americans can pursue a destiny of social rebirth today. The objective laws of history necessitated that transformation and will prove mutually beneficial to both parties.
0
0
2
@mechabere
Professor Bere
5 hours
@wintergroyper1 @RichardBSpencer Before men devised laws they freely associated and lived a moral life albeit primitive. Law stems from property relations that are built off of the agricultural relations. We see this in all social animals.
0
0
3
@mechabere
Professor Bere
5 hours
@wintergroyper1 @RichardBSpencer This is incorrect. You are taking your subjectivity (apparently having a desire to be a degenerate?) and trying to make an objective fact of it.
1
0
2
@mechabere
Professor Bere
5 hours
@wintergroyper1 @RichardBSpencer Yes. The American worker needed to be declassed in order to even start to have the beginnings of class consciousness, as irony would have it.
1
0
1
@mechabere
Professor Bere
5 hours
@wintergroyper1 @RichardBSpencer Man's rational capacity is unusual amongst creation. Creation itself is irrational which is why man was put on Earth to govern it. Using logic to show that you are a troglodyte isn't semantics. Its eristics.
1
0
1
@mechabere
Professor Bere
5 hours
@wintergroyper1 @RichardBSpencer Marxism does challenge the nature of liberalism by sublating it because the aberration of liberalism is how it isolates people and reduces them to an atomized individual. Reactionarism is impossible because the facts of liberal society emerge from objective material conditions.
0
0
1
@mechabere
Professor Bere
5 hours
@wintergroyper1 @RichardBSpencer Man is not prone to crime otherwise society would implode. There are a handful of degenerates who are aberrations but they do not make up the majority. Most people don't think about doing heinous shit, actually, they imagine themselves as the guy who stops heinous shit.
1
0
1
@mechabere
Professor Bere
5 hours
@wintergroyper1 @RichardBSpencer China is quite equitable to the countries it offers development plans to and has in a few cases completely wrote off a loan they gave to them.
1
0
1
@mechabere
Professor Bere
5 hours
@wintergroyper1 @RichardBSpencer Yes. Why would you build everything from scratch like an idiot when somebody can help you? Relying on others isn't parasitism, Shadow the Hedgehog, easy on the edge
0
0
2
@mechabere
Professor Bere
5 hours
@wintergroyper1 @RichardBSpencer So you engage in troglodytism because irrationality is the first principle of nature, what arises next in the human organism is reason which negates, but since there is a contradiction between these two you fall back on the first principle to avoid resolving it.
1
0
1
@mechabere
Professor Bere
6 hours
@wintergroyper1 @RichardBSpencer One thing must precede from another necessarily. This is basic logic. The only thing that can save man is emancipating him from the spiritual degradation that is a heartless, isolated, antisocial world which you propose by reclaiming Being and Community by negating liberalism.
1
0
2
@mechabere
Professor Bere
6 hours
@wintergroyper1 @RichardBSpencer As for harmonious development it exists in the facts of commerce that China enacts when it signs off on development projects in various countries around the world. This is a material fact, it actually happens, and is not just a theory of how nature operates.
1
0
3
@mechabere
Professor Bere
6 hours
@wintergroyper1 @RichardBSpencer Jesus fucking Christ, I can't argue with Calvinist dogmatics. Man needs no perfecting, his techniques of survival need to become more robust in order to pursue a more moral existence. Like, do you think human beings are rational actors so I know how to go forward?
1
0
0
@mechabere
Professor Bere
6 hours
@wintergroyper1 @RichardBSpencer And that man's moral weakness is resulting from that lack of technique, the material basis, and not as a matter of some sort of Puritanical original sin that condemns him to violence and iniquity.
1
0
1
@mechabere
Professor Bere
6 hours
@wintergroyper1 @RichardBSpencer It is most certainly an abstraction because you're still conceiving of it as a "natural law" which is an abstraction of itself. Harmonious development does work as reality has shown us. The people who feel cheated are the hegemons who carry on bourgeois reproduction (competition)
1
0
2