@RTGatsby @BobJohn53618882 @DeathsSunrise @PCamero95730249 @ReksGivins @LisaA311 @Zoomerette @cpblahrad In Wisconsin, exception 3(c) of the “possession of a dangerous weapon by a person under 18” statute s.948.60 provides a carve-out for persons over the age of 16 in possession of a regular length rifle or shotgun, unsupervised.

@RogerNo95373416 @ThisIsKyleR The Luigi Mangione thread is that way ———->

@gschild2 @MetalCoreNTacos @BobJohn53618882 @VAPatriot14 @Mr_Darklighter @TweetMeLikeDeej @EndWokeness That is apparent.

@gschild2 @MetalCoreNTacos @BobJohn53618882 @VAPatriot14 @Mr_Darklighter @TweetMeLikeDeej @EndWokeness The actual trial testimony might be a better source than Wikipedia. Just a suggestion.

@noliej @mermaidmazie @RightWingCope Maybe you should brush up on your state’s self-defense laws then? The shootings were not unlawful. You should be more worried that Wisconsin’s ADA tried to railroad a kid into prison for defending himself. 🤷🏻‍♂️

@KenZeroHarm @AngelaMM123 @YouTube Expert medical opinion on the causes of death or collapse that contradict the opinion of the prosecution witness, and which was never heard at trial, however, is evidence.

@not_that_CK @MyricsForge @LloydGeorge57 The jury heard how he had crossed the state line on the 24th to go to his part-time lifeguard job in Pleasant Prairie, before going on to hang out overnight at Dominick Black's house. He and Black were only asked by Nick Smith to guard the Car Source on the morning of the 25th.

@not_that_CK @MetalCoreNTacos @MyricsForge @LloydGeorge57 It depends on the circumstances of any such shooting. When the circumstances of Rittrnhouse’s actions are examined, the video evidence of which was available from the instant the shootings happened, there was no legal basis to charge him. 🤷🏻‍♂️

@not_that_CK @MyricsForge @MetalCoreNTacos @LloydGeorge57 He still had the right of expectation not to be unlawfully attacked on a city street as long as he did not provoke it. Regardless of the fact that he was at a scene of civil unrest.

@not_that_CK @BobJohn53618882 @MetalCoreNTacos @MyricsForge @LloydGeorge57 His lawful use of force in self-defense was not taking the law into his own hands. The shootings were not some extrajudicial killing. He had privilege to defend himself under the law.

@not_that_CK @eyemjimmy @MyricsForge @LloydGeorge57 Why would that negate privilege of self-defense, as long as he did not provoke the attack? (Which there was no evidence he did)

@not_that_CK @eyemjimmy @MyricsForge @LloydGeorge57 That isn’t the legal standard however.

@DoctorBiobrain @johnniewalkerd1 @Illianonyc @LosSignmakrDeCt @USA90sGal07 A crazy homeless man who had threatened to kill him if he caught him alone on the street, and made a grab for the rifle after ambushing him. I defy anybody to suggest that none of the other armed individuals would have done the same as Rittenhouse in the same circumstances.

@takemethereAE5 @godsman1994 @JosephStigler @pariyonaaa @22ereh @Adam90768 @PCamero95730249 @Al12Just @SeeRacists One doesn’t have to be MAGA to discredit the suggestion that his mother gave him the rifle. It has been common knowledge for some time now that the rifle was his friend Dominick Black’s gun.

@DoctorBiobrain @another_poster @johnniewalkerd1 @Illianonyc @LosSignmakrDeCt @USA90sGal07 You probably need to watch the trial.

@TornadicDoge24 @MetalCoreNTacos The shootings were not unlawful. Lawful use of force in self-defense is not the crime of murder.

@Cutes811 @USA90sGal07 @LloydGeorge57 Murder is indeed against the law. Self-defense and defense of others provides a complete legal defense against the crime of murder where the force used is judged to be reasonable and justified.

@DoctorBiobrain @johnniewalkerd1 @blak661 @Illianonyc @LosSignmakrDeCt @USA90sGal07 When did I do that?

@DoctorBiobrain @goatpurple1 @johnniewalkerd1 @Illianonyc @LosSignmakrDeCt @USA90sGal07 It is only to ensure that any verdicts are robust, and that defendants cannot claim that they did not get a fair trial because of the state introducing things that unduly prejudiced the jury against them. Witnesses and complainants do not have to worry about such jeopardy.

@DoctorBiobrain @johnniewalkerd1 @blak661 @Illianonyc @LosSignmakrDeCt @USA90sGal07 Assailants (not victims) Neither Huber nor Grosskreutz were ever witnessed rioting, but I don't believe that either of Rittenhouse's attorneys ever claimed that they were.