True

Nowhere in our Constitution is a single federal judge given absolute power over the President or the people of the United States.

Jamie Raskin’s wife previously served at the top levels of the treasury and the federal reserve during the Obama administration. Raskin took eight months to disclose his wife’s sale of 195,936 shares of Reserve Trust, where she sat on the advisory board. This sale resulted in $1.5 million in profit for Raskin’s wife. This was a violation of the Stock Act. But that’s not the real story, the real stories is that in 2018, when she sat on the advisory board, the Fed granted Reserve Trust unusual access to its master account — an enviable get that allows the fintech company to move money for customers without relying on banks. This was the only state chartered trust company in the country to get one. And that’s why she got 1.5 million dollars in exchange. You see why @RepRaskin is terrified of @elonmusk and DOGE auditing the treasury.

Judge HALTS Unnecessary Roadblocks to Musk’s Government Efficiency Program A federal judge has temporarily stopped Elon Musk’s Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) from accessing the U.S. Treasury’s payment systems. Why? Because they’re pushing back against the old, outdated bureaucracy that’s been holding back progress. Musk’s mission? Streamline government, cut waste, and eliminate fraud — all while protecting taxpayer dollars. But apparently, some politicians aren’t ready to see real change. The lawsuit filed by 19 Democratic state AGs claims that this efficiency push threatens national security. But let’s be honest, the real concern is: Musk is shaking up a system that’s been broken for decades. Why this is important: Efficiency: Musk’s team aims to eliminate waste and make government work smarter — something we desperately need. Cost-Cutting: Programs like Social Security and federal employee wages should be streamlined, not bogged down by inefficiency. Progress: Musk is bringing innovation to a government that’s been stuck in the past. What do YOU think? Are these legal challenges just resistance to needed reforms? Or is the system too set in its ways to accept change? Share this post and join the conversation — we need to keep pushing for a government that works for us, not against us!